![]() |
![]() |
#1 |
May 2004
31610 Posts |
![]()
Mally was primarily a "puzzles" personality- he used to love solving puzzzles.The following small puzzle is dedicated to him:
The function 3^n-2 generates numbers such that their digits add up to 7. a)Is there a simple algebraic explanation?b)Are there other similar functions? Devaraj |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Jun 2003
The Texas Hill Country
32·112 Posts |
![]()
Unfortunately, you left out the fact that it fails for n < 2.
For larger n, it is very easy to prove. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 | |
Cranksta Rap Ayatollah
Jul 2003
641 Posts |
![]() Quote:
although if we consider D(x) to be the sum of digits of x and D_k(x) to be the k-th iteration of D(x), then lim(k->oo) D_k(3^n-2) = 7 is true for n > 1 |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Jun 2003
The Texas Hill Country
32·112 Posts |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Dec 2005
22×72 Posts |
![]()
3^4-2=79...sums to 16, but I suppose you need to keep summing
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
Cranksta Rap Ayatollah
Jul 2003
641 Posts |
![]()
I meant to say n = 4 and n > 5, I was posting far too late last night
Last fiddled with by Orgasmic Troll on 2007-10-08 at 11:23 |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
"Lucan"
Dec 2006
England
2·3·13·83 Posts |
![]()
It would be ironic if a problem dedicated to Mally were
badly formulated ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 | |
Cranksta Rap Ayatollah
Jul 2003
641 Posts |
![]() Quote:
for n>1, 3^n is divisible by 9. In a base-r number system, numbers divisible by (r-1) will have an eventual digit sum of (r-1), so in base 10, numbers divisible by 9 have an eventual digit sum of 9. Subtract 2, and you get 7 Similar functions will probably use the same trick. 3^n-5, for example, will always have an eventual digit sum of 4. 18^n-7 will have an eventual digit sum of 2. multiples of other digits cycle, for example, for n = 1, 2, ... the eventual digit sums of 7n are 7, 5, 3, 1, 8, 6, 4, 2, 9, 7, 5, 3, 1, 8, 6, 4, 2, 9, ... note, this is a cycle of length 9, so if we wanted to pick out one digit and make it consistent, then we replace n with 9n + k, but then we get 63n + 7k, and the divisibility by 9 trick comes in. so, basically, here's how you create one of these bad boys. Find some function f(x) where 9|f(x) and then create g(x) = f(x) + k. I would be curious to see an example that doesn't fit this form, or a proof that all of them have to |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Mally | devarajkandadai | Math | 12 | 2011-01-25 21:11 |
Dedicated Prime95 rig | hj47 | Hardware | 18 | 2008-12-29 23:24 |
Mally | devarajkandadai | Math | 2 | 2008-11-19 12:46 |
Mally's habits | devarajkandadai | Math | 6 | 2008-01-20 15:38 |
Mally sequence | devarajkandadai | Math | 0 | 2007-10-11 05:33 |