Register FAQ Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

 2021-04-11, 08:34 #1 retina Undefined     "The unspeakable one" Jun 2006 My evil lair 2·23·137 Posts Doubling your average speed? You are at the beginning of a perfectly flat and perfectly straight section of road that is exactly 1000 metres long (d = 1000 metres). You are wearing a Super-Chronograph 9000 stopwatch which can measure time precisely without any error. At the beginning of the road section you start the timer on your Super-Chronograph 9000 and travel to the other end of the road. When you reach the far end you note the elapsed time (t1 = 1000 seconds) and compute the average speed (v1 = d / t1). You then instantly turn around and start to travel back to the beginning. When you reach the beginning again you stop the timer (t2) and compute your overall average speed as (v2 = 2 * d / t2). At what speed must you travel during the return to have (v2 = 2 * v1)? I spell metre with '...re', too bad, just accept it, hah!
 2021-04-11, 10:09 #2 slandrum   Jan 2021 California 2×127 Posts You have to travel back instantaneously.
2021-04-11, 10:18   #3
retina
Undefined

"The unspeakable one"
Jun 2006
My evil lair

142368 Posts

Quote:
 Originally Posted by slandrum You have to travel back instantaneously.
Quote:
 Originally Posted by retina At what speed must you travel during the return to have (v2 = 2 * v1)?

 2021-04-11, 10:33 #4 slandrum   Jan 2021 California 2×127 Posts Well, since you are measuring the time by your own watch that you are taking with you, you have to travel back in 0 time, so you have to travel at c (the speed of light). If you were not in a relativistic space and there was an absolute time reference, there's no speed at which you could travel back to double your average speed. Last fiddled with by slandrum on 2021-04-11 at 10:34
2021-04-11, 11:07   #5
retina
Undefined

"The unspeakable one"
Jun 2006
My evil lair

2·23·137 Posts

Quote:
 Originally Posted by slandrum Well, since you are measuring the time by your own watch that you are taking with you, you have to travel back in 0 time, so you have to travel at c (the speed of light).

People here are too smart to fool so easily.
Quote:
 Originally Posted by slandrum If you were not in a relativistic space and there was an absolute time reference, there's no speed at which you could travel back to double your average speed.
What about travelling at infinite speed?

2021-04-11, 13:00   #6
xilman
Bamboozled!

"πΊππ·π·π­"
May 2003
Down not across

2×5×1,103 Posts

Quote:
 Originally Posted by slandrum Well, since you are measuring the time by your own watch that you are taking with you, you have to travel back in 0 time, so you have to travel at c (the speed of light). If you were not in a relativistic space and there was an absolute time reference, there's no speed at which you could travel back to double your average speed.
Quantum tunnelling?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quantu...ter_than_light

 Similar Threads Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post petrw1 PrimeNet 2 2013-06-17 05:17 Dubslow Software 11 2011-08-02 00:04 Unregistered Information & Answers 10 2011-07-27 12:34 MooooMoo Lounge 28 2010-03-27 21:29 Brian-E Software 19 2007-10-13 10:31

All times are UTC. The time now is 22:47.

Sun Dec 5 22:47:31 UTC 2021 up 135 days, 17:16, 0 users, load averages: 1.46, 1.17, 1.26