mersenneforum.org > Data Strategic Double Clicking
 Register FAQ Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

2016-02-12, 16:13   #848
Prime95
P90 years forever!

Aug 2002
Yeehaw, FL

22×3×641 Posts

Quote:
 Originally Posted by Madpoo Meanwhile, if you're hungry for some good old fashioned strategic double checks, here's the latest batch of 2+ to 1 bad-to-good. Some are in the cat 4 "churn" category (the 40M-42M) so get 'em while you can. Code: exponent Bad Good Unk Sus Solo Mis worktodo 38341909 2 1 2 0 2 0 DoubleCheck=38341909,71,1 38456843 2 1 2 0 2 0 DoubleCheck=38456843,71,1 38898667 8 4 3 1 2 2 DoubleCheck=38898667,71,1 40459187 5 1 2 0 2 0 DoubleCheck=40459187,72,1 40494269 6 0 1 0 1 0 DoubleCheck=40494269,72,1 40575707 2 0 3 0 1 2 DoubleCheck=40575707,72,1 41537261 4 0 1 1 1 1 DoubleCheck=41537261,72,1 42393961 2 0 5 0 5 0 DoubleCheck=42393961,72,1 42430061 2 1 2 1 2 1 DoubleCheck=42430061,72,1 52276529 21 3 5 5 5 5 DoubleCheck=52276529,73,1 58080709 2 0 4 0 4 0 DoubleCheck=58080709,73,1
I took all these except the ones already grabbed by the churners.

2016-02-13, 03:02   #849
cuBerBruce

Aug 2012
Mass., USA

2·3·53 Posts

Quote:
 Originally Posted by Madpoo Code: exponent Bad Good Unk Sus Solo Mis worktodo 51753259 3 0 2 1 2 1 DoubleCheck=51753259,73,1
I've taken this one.

2016-02-13, 16:36   #850

"Kieren"
Jul 2011
In My Own Galaxy!

2×3×1,693 Posts

Quote:
Thanks. I may have to keep that 580 doing TF. It does not seem to be totally reliable on LL.

Quote:
 Originally Posted by 0PolarBearsHere Yeah I gave up on LLing with my 770 for the same reason.
On this theme, I am trying an approach which I have talked about, but never followed through on. I am running a regular DC on the 580, without using a looping batch file to start it. I have the VRAM slowed from 2100 to 1900 MHz. This is in line with the way I have set up to run CuLu on other cards.

If CuLu times out, it will just stop. I may loose some processing time this way, but I will be able to reset the memory clock to the lower speed after a driver reset.

I started this run early this morning. I am delighted that it has now continued for a little over six hours without stalling. Of course, verified runs don't prove reliability, but they would increase my confidence in the settings for the card.

2016-02-14, 02:52   #851

"Kieren"
Jul 2011
In My Own Galaxy!

2×3×1,693 Posts

Quote:
 Originally Posted by kladner Quote: Originally Posted by kladner http://www.mersenneforum.org/images/...s/viewpost.gif Thanks. I may have to keep that 580 doing TF. It does not seem to be totally reliable on LL. On this theme, I am trying an approach which I have talked about, but never followed through on. I am running a regular DC on the 580, without using a looping batch file to start it. I have the VRAM slowed from 2100 to 1900 MHz. This is in line with the way I have set up to run CuLu on other cards. If CuLu times out, it will just stop. I may loose some processing time this way, but I will be able to reset the memory clock to the lower speed after a driver reset. I started this run early this morning. I am delighted that it has now continued for a little over six hours without stalling. Of course, verified runs don't prove reliability, but they would increase my confidence in the settings for the card.
Now 16.5 hours uninterupted, 58.09% complete, ETA 12 hours neat. I hope these updates don't jinx the process, or unduly provoke the Noodly Appendages.

Last fiddled with by kladner on 2016-02-14 at 02:53

2016-02-14, 12:20   #852
0PolarBearsHere

Oct 2015

2×7×19 Posts

Quote:
 Originally Posted by kladner Now 16.5 hours uninterupted, 58.09% complete, ETA 12 hours neat. I hope these updates don't jinx the process, or unduly provoke the Noodly Appendages.
I might look into that. My problem is that I'll go back and see that CudaLucas has quit and I need to restart it. I just took to making a bat file to run it about 30 times in a row to help counteract it.

 2016-02-14, 15:34 #853 ET_ Banned     "Luigi" Aug 2002 Team Italia 2·2,417 Posts Code: DoubleCheck=46189607,72,1 No match, unverified.
2016-02-14, 19:47   #854

"Kieren"
Jul 2011
In My Own Galaxy!

2×3×1,693 Posts

Quote:
 Originally Posted by kladner Now 16.5 hours uninterupted, 58.09% complete, ETA 12 hours neat. I hope these updates don't jinx the process, or unduly provoke the Noodly Appendages.
The run finished with one timeout. Result matched. This was a regular DC, not a strategic check against machines with bad histories. It is more useful at the moment to test the setup where there is a better chance of a match if the result is correct.

 2016-02-14, 23:43 #855 fivemack (loop (#_fork))     Feb 2006 Cambridge, England 11001001011002 Posts Mismatch for 51770489, could someone do the TC?
 2016-02-16, 09:51 #856 fivemack (loop (#_fork))     Feb 2006 Cambridge, England 11001001011002 Posts Mismatch for 51940249 - I suspect user 'lelikoid' had a rather flaky computer at some point.
2016-02-16, 10:43   #857
LaurV
Romulan Interpreter

"name field"
Jun 2011
Thailand

22·11·223 Posts

Quote:
 Originally Posted by fivemack Mismatch for 51940249 - I suspect user 'lelikoid' had a rather flaky computer at some point.
I will take both from your last 2 posts.

 2016-02-16, 16:24 #858 airsquirrels     "David" Jul 2015 Ohio 11·47 Posts Anyone mind running a quad-check on 36122771? I've been using triple checks to verify stability on a bunch of GPUs and that one came mismatched.

 Similar Threads Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post Mysticial Software 52 2021-04-23 06:51 marigonzes Information & Answers 2 2017-02-14 16:56 jasong jasong 7 2015-08-17 10:56 137ben PrimeNet 6 2012-03-13 04:01 Uncwilly Puzzles 8 2006-07-03 16:02

All times are UTC. The time now is 11:15.

Thu Dec 9 11:15:15 UTC 2021 up 139 days, 5:44, 0 users, load averages: 1.21, 1.33, 1.34