mersenneforum.org > Data Strategic Double Clicking
 Register FAQ Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

2016-01-08, 05:58   #727
Serpentine Vermin Jar

Jul 2014

31·107 Posts

Quote:
 Originally Posted by LaurV First, this seems to be unassigned and there is no residue showing non-zero stuff (like your double check you talk about). Then, his point was that if such cases still exist (obviously yes, as you just proved), then it should be nice to have a list with them, so someone can pick worktodo from it and eliminate all the doubt. Can you generate such a list and make it public? Third, even if all are zero, it may not mean that the number is prime. This is only the tail of the full residue. Statistically, we can get a result with all the last 16 hex digits being zero every 18,446,744,073,709,551,616 exponents...
Take those 3 and do triple checks. The rest of the examples were ones I did a verifying run (they'd already been DC'd and mine matched). That was back in late 2014/early 2015 when I ran through those.

Examples:
M45001289
M57128059
M53878507
M53593511

 2016-01-08, 06:06 #728 LaurV Romulan Interpreter     "name field" Jun 2011 Thailand 231208 Posts Well, it makes no sense for us to TC your DC work, or Jerry's (flashjh) DC work, who all we know they are serious users. No hard feeling, I thought that the list is longer... Last fiddled with by LaurV on 2016-01-08 at 06:06
2016-01-08, 17:07   #729
Mark Rose

"/X\(‘-‘)/X\"
Jan 2013

37·79 Posts

Quote:
 Originally Posted by frmky 38746493 needs a quad check.
We matched.

2016-01-08, 21:29   #730
Serpentine Vermin Jar

Jul 2014

63658 Posts

Quote:
 Originally Posted by LaurV Well, it makes no sense for us to TC your DC work, or Jerry's (flashjh) DC work, who all we know they are serious users. No hard feeling, I thought that the list is longer...
True, but feel free to tackle these... they still need a DC or TC:

M66921341
M62891251
M79060367

 2016-01-09, 17:47 #731 Madpoo Serpentine Vermin Jar     Jul 2014 331710 Posts Here's another batch of 3:1 bad/good. A new machine has popped into this category with exponents 66M and up. Fun. Code: exponent Bad Good Unk Sus Solo Mis worktodo 37556317 6 2 2 0 2 0 DoubleCheck=37556317,71,1 38469643 7 1 2 0 2 0 DoubleCheck=38469643,71,1 38554643 9 1 2 0 1 1 DoubleCheck=38554643,71,1 38687069 6 0 1 2 1 2 DoubleCheck=38687069,71,1 50556613 3 1 2 0 2 0 DoubleCheck=50556613,73,1 51224081 3 1 2 0 2 0 DoubleCheck=51224081,73,1 51808909 14 4 3 1 3 1 DoubleCheck=51808909,73,1 66003799 3 0 13 0 12 1 DoubleCheck=66003799,75,1 66009547 3 0 13 0 12 1 DoubleCheck=66009547,75,1 66010223 3 0 13 0 12 1 DoubleCheck=66010223,74,1 66028241 3 0 13 0 12 1 DoubleCheck=66028241,74,1 69280429 3 0 13 0 12 1 DoubleCheck=69280429,74,1 69294259 3 0 13 0 12 1 DoubleCheck=69294259,74,1 69695849 3 0 13 0 12 1 DoubleCheck=69695849,74,1 69698221 3 0 13 0 12 1 DoubleCheck=69698221,74,1 69698341 3 0 13 0 12 1 DoubleCheck=69698341,74,1 69699943 3 0 13 0 12 1 DoubleCheck=69699943,74,1 77187083 3 0 13 0 12 1 DoubleCheck=77187083,74,1 77187181 3 0 13 0 12 1 DoubleCheck=77187181,74,1
2016-01-09, 22:41   #732
ric

Jul 2004
Milan, Ita

2748 Posts

Quote:
 Originally Posted by Madpoo Here's another batch of 3:1 bad/good. Code: exponent Bad Good Unk Sus Solo Mis worktodo 37556317 6 2 2 0 2 0 DoubleCheck=37556317,71,1 38469643 7 1 2 0 2 0 DoubleCheck=38469643,71,1 38554643 9 1 2 0 1 1 DoubleCheck=38554643,71,1 38687069 6 0 1 2 1 2 DoubleCheck=38687069,71,1
mine

2016-01-09, 23:34   #733
ATH
Einyen

Dec 2003
Denmark

2×3×13×41 Posts

Quote:
 Originally Posted by Madpoo Here's another batch of 3:1 bad/good. A new machine has popped into this category with exponents 66M and up. Fun.
Just out of curiosity: How many users are on your "watch list" and how many computers?

2016-01-10, 17:06   #734
chalsall
If I May

"Chris Halsall"
Sep 2002

3·17·197 Posts

Quote:
 Originally Posted by Madpoo Here's another batch of 3:1 bad/good. A new machine has popped into this category with exponents 66M and up. Fun.
Took 50556613 through to 69699943 inclusive.

2016-01-11, 02:43   #735
Serpentine Vermin Jar

Jul 2014

31×107 Posts

Quote:
 Originally Posted by ATH Just out of curiosity: How many users are on your "watch list" and how many computers?
There are 439 computers with 1 or more "solo checked" exponents and have more bad than good. That's the basic universe of bad machines I focus on.

Sometimes I look for any that have 1 or more bad and have an equal amount of good.

Once these "worst of the worst" are resolved (no more solo checked) I can focus on some that have a lot of bad but have more good. For instance there's one machine I'm curious about that has something like 1300 solo checked stuff, 85 or so bad and 320 or so good. That ~25% error rate is concerning, and they're spread out over a year. If it holds true there would be another few hundred bad results lurking in there.

It's just not as rewarding to do 4 tests and only one mismatched.

PS - Don't ask me how one machine could submit so many results in one year... beats me. Could have been manually checked in from multiple machines, or multi machines sharing one local.txt file... That's probably why only one in 4 is bad, because only one machine out of XX were flaky.

 2016-01-12, 01:43 #736 UBR47K     Aug 2015 22·17 Posts Triple Checks needed on: Code: DoubleCheck=37172633,71,1 DoubleCheck=37289719,71,1
2016-01-12, 02:43   #737
Mark Rose

"/X\(‘-‘)/X\"
Jan 2013

B6B16 Posts

Quote:
 Originally Posted by UBR47K Triple Checks needed on: Code: DoubleCheck=37172633,71,1 DoubleCheck=37289719,71,1
Mine.

 Similar Threads Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post Mysticial Software 52 2021-04-23 06:51 marigonzes Information & Answers 2 2017-02-14 16:56 jasong jasong 7 2015-08-17 10:56 137ben PrimeNet 6 2012-03-13 04:01 Uncwilly Puzzles 8 2006-07-03 16:02

All times are UTC. The time now is 17:04.

Sat Dec 4 17:04:51 UTC 2021 up 134 days, 11:33, 1 user, load averages: 0.88, 1.15, 1.22

This forum has received and complied with 0 (zero) government requests for information.

Permission is granted to copy, distribute and/or modify this document under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.2 or any later version published by the Free Software Foundation.
A copy of the license is included in the FAQ.