mersenneforum.org  

Go Back   mersenneforum.org > Factoring Projects > Aliquot Sequences

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 2022-08-17, 02:22   #716
EdH
 
EdH's Avatar
 
"Ed Hall"
Dec 2009
Adirondack Mtns

2×3×19×43 Posts
Default

I ran my search for completed bases and our lists are close, but I show base 70 with an open sequence at 70^72: 201/181, due to a merge with 1074.
EdH is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2022-08-17, 03:40   #717
gd_barnes
 
gd_barnes's Avatar
 
May 2007
Kansas; USA

2C6316 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by EdH View Post
I ran my search for completed bases and our lists are close, but I show base 70 with an open sequence at 70^72: 201/181, due to a merge with 1074.
Then they match! :-)

After our previous discussion, I no longer considered merges as remaining and removed them from my spreadsheet resulting in base 70 having zero remaining.

Semantics really. I was wanting the list verified more than anything.
gd_barnes is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2022-08-17, 04:06   #718
VBCurtis
 
VBCurtis's Avatar
 
"Curtis"
Feb 2005
Riverside, CA

2·3·11·83 Posts
Default

I factored:
82^92 C142
61^99 C139
770^60 C140

It's nice to work on just a single params file, trying lots of different settings. Sadly, I have not yet found the magic key to the 10-15% more speed I expect exists.

I'll continue on the list from post #684. If any of those numbers get factored, please delete them from that list?
Also, may I delete the ones I've factored from there, so I can more easily see what is still available?
VBCurtis is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2022-08-17, 04:29   #719
gd_barnes
 
gd_barnes's Avatar
 
May 2007
Kansas; USA

11×1,033 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by VBCurtis View Post
I factored:
82^92 C142
61^99 C139
770^60 C140

It's nice to work on just a single params file, trying lots of different settings. Sadly, I have not yet found the magic key to the 10-15% more speed I expect exists.

I'll continue on the list from post #684. If any of those numbers get factored, please delete them from that list?
Also, may I delete the ones I've factored from there, so I can more easily see what is still available?
See my post #715. The ones in that post can be removed from your list in #684 as well as from the reservations post #1.
gd_barnes is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2022-08-17, 10:32   #720
gd_barnes
 
gd_barnes's Avatar
 
May 2007
Kansas; USA

11·1,033 Posts
Default

720^56 and 1058^51 terminate

This leaves 2 remaining for base 720.

I brought all of the cofactors for same-parities up to C>=120 tonight. There were 9 such sequences for starting-size <=185, all originally with factor 3 in them. All are done now. In doing so, I found some sequences that might be of interest:

Ed, you might like another one with no known factor to ECM t45:
91^85: 165/165

It's interesting how it dropped the 3 factor along with everything else on the current iteration.

Mike, if you need more work, here are a couple at ECM t35 that you can add to your list that fit your criteria:
1210^52: 161/142/3
92^84: 165/145/5
gd_barnes is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2022-08-17, 12:12   #721
EdH
 
EdH's Avatar
 
"Ed Hall"
Dec 2009
Adirondack Mtns

2×3×19×43 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by VBCurtis View Post
I factored:
82^92 C142
61^99 C139
770^60 C140

It's nice to work on just a single params file, trying lots of different settings. Sadly, I have not yet found the magic key to the 10-15% more speed I expect exists.

I'll continue on the list from post #684. If any of those numbers get factored, please delete them from that list?
Also, may I delete the ones I've factored from there, so I can more easily see what is still available?
Thanks! Please feel free to edit either list. If you like, I can generate another with smaller leading terms and we can start fresh with that list. I could even narrow the cofactor range to be more specific to your current work.

Edit: The current two sets have been removed from post #684.

Last fiddled with by EdH on 2022-08-17 at 12:19
EdH is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2022-08-17, 15:06   #722
EdH
 
EdH's Avatar
 
"Ed Hall"
Dec 2009
Adirondack Mtns

2×3×19×43 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by gd_barnes View Post
. . .
Ed, you might like another one with no known factor to ECM t45:
91^85: 165/165
. . .
Indeed, this is of interest. I will try to queue it when this current one finishes, but I'm probably going to be quite busy through the weekend without time/access to do much. The current one is "supposed" to be done sieving tonight. I'm very curious as to whether it will complete on its own and whether the GPU will work, and if so, how much time it will knock off the Msieve LA.
EdH is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2022-08-17, 21:09   #723
gd_barnes
 
gd_barnes's Avatar
 
May 2007
Kansas; USA

11·1,033 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by gd_barnes View Post
The following post 1 reservations were impacted by my recent effort to ECM/initialize everything up to starting size 185:

107^91: was 182/139 now 178/177
193^79: was 175/139 now 165/163
33550336^24: was 181/143 now 181/135
151^83: was 172/144 now 170/153
162^83: was 184/144 now 184/132

These were not reserved at the starting time of my effort, which completed a bit over a day ago. Only the C140s/C141s were reserved at that time. Hopefully there is not too much inconvenience.

Mike, the above had previously had no ECM. There are still some in the list with starting size > 185 digits that have had none. Just thought I'd make you aware.
Ed,

You can also remove the above sequences from post 1 and 684 to avoid confusion.

Gary
gd_barnes is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2022-08-19, 05:50   #724
VBCurtis
 
VBCurtis's Avatar
 
"Curtis"
Feb 2005
Riverside, CA

156616 Posts
Default

I factored:
69^99 C145
88^94 C143
I had some other ~C140s from other sources (like my own 13^n aliquot work) that I've also been cracking.
I've removed these two from post #684.
I'll do 88^92 overnight. I'm picking composites by estimated factoring time until I'm back at my machine- so I'm bouncing all over the list.
VBCurtis is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2022-08-19, 07:15   #725
gd_barnes
 
gd_barnes's Avatar
 
May 2007
Kansas; USA

101100011000112 Posts
Default

92^90 terminates

Ed, that was extremely impressive break of the C173! I think you said your machines spent about a week on it. Please take credit for it. It took ~2 mins to terminate after you were done with it.

Base 92 is an extremely difficult base. Before this, the biggest termination was 92^76. Nearly all remaining exponents have a factor 3, 10 out of 11 to be exact. The one that doesn't just dropped the 3 on the last iteration. That gives an idea of how amazing this is.
gd_barnes is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2022-08-20, 12:02   #726
gd_barnes
 
gd_barnes's Avatar
 
May 2007
Kansas; USA

2C6316 Posts
Default

91^85 terminates

Kudos to Ed again for cracking the C165 !!
gd_barnes is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Unexpected termination of PM-1 Miszka Software 22 2021-11-19 21:36
Easier pi(x) approximation mathPuzzles Math 8 2017-05-04 10:58
Would finding a definate Pi value easier if... xtreme2k Math 34 2013-09-09 23:54
Aliquot Termination Question - Largest Prime? EdH Aliquot Sequences 6 2010-04-06 00:12
A new termination below 100k 10metreh Aliquot Sequences 0 2010-03-11 18:24

All times are UTC. The time now is 17:13.


Sat Oct 1 17:13:13 UTC 2022 up 44 days, 14:41, 1 user, load averages: 1.23, 1.15, 1.09

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2022, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

This forum has received and complied with 0 (zero) government requests for information.

Permission is granted to copy, distribute and/or modify this document under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.2 or any later version published by the Free Software Foundation.
A copy of the license is included in the FAQ.

≠ ± ∓ ÷ × · − √ ‰ ⊗ ⊕ ⊖ ⊘ ⊙ ≤ ≥ ≦ ≧ ≨ ≩ ≺ ≻ ≼ ≽ ⊏ ⊐ ⊑ ⊒ ² ³ °
∠ ∟ ° ≅ ~ ‖ ⟂ ⫛
≡ ≜ ≈ ∝ ∞ ≪ ≫ ⌊⌋ ⌈⌉ ∘ ∏ ∐ ∑ ∧ ∨ ∩ ∪ ⨀ ⊕ ⊗ 𝖕 𝖖 𝖗 ⊲ ⊳
∅ ∖ ∁ ↦ ↣ ∩ ∪ ⊆ ⊂ ⊄ ⊊ ⊇ ⊃ ⊅ ⊋ ⊖ ∈ ∉ ∋ ∌ ℕ ℤ ℚ ℝ ℂ ℵ ℶ ℷ ℸ 𝓟
¬ ∨ ∧ ⊕ → ← ⇒ ⇐ ⇔ ∀ ∃ ∄ ∴ ∵ ⊤ ⊥ ⊢ ⊨ ⫤ ⊣ … ⋯ ⋮ ⋰ ⋱
∫ ∬ ∭ ∮ ∯ ∰ ∇ ∆ δ ∂ ℱ ℒ ℓ
𝛢𝛼 𝛣𝛽 𝛤𝛾 𝛥𝛿 𝛦𝜀𝜖 𝛧𝜁 𝛨𝜂 𝛩𝜃𝜗 𝛪𝜄 𝛫𝜅 𝛬𝜆 𝛭𝜇 𝛮𝜈 𝛯𝜉 𝛰𝜊 𝛱𝜋 𝛲𝜌 𝛴𝜎𝜍 𝛵𝜏 𝛶𝜐 𝛷𝜙𝜑 𝛸𝜒 𝛹𝜓 𝛺𝜔