processed dc and tc posts

[Uncwilly]

Originally Posted by kriesel

These are currently shown as -Anonymous-, as in when they are available.

Good catch. I put them back in the hopper.

[ZacHFX]

Originally Posted by Uncwilly

Good catch. I put them back in the hopper.

Not sure why they were showing up as anonymous. I claimed them both as per my previous post. They are both assigned to me when I open up their pages, and will be finishing in the next few hours.

[lisanderke]

Apologies, I picked up these assignments and assumed that it would be fine to work on them as long as they're reserved to me on Primenet. I'll try and announce reservations I make here in the future. (Though some of the certifications did get booted off my prime95 for some reason, probably too much work queued up, but they got unreserved so they should be up on the list with its next update.)



Quick aside, I completed certification of 332192831 and in the next ~6hrs certification of 332201033 should finish. Three days ago I also reserved 61422107. Should finish in the next week.

[Uncwilly]

Originally Posted by ZacHFX

Not sure why they were showing up as anonymous. I claimed them both as per my previous post. They are both assigned to me when I open up their pages, and will be finishing in the next few hours.

A few minutes ago I checked and they were assigned to anon. Now to you. I will pull them off the list.

[ZacHFX]

Originally Posted by lisanderke

Apologies, I picked up these assignments and assumed that it would be fine to work on them as long as they're reserved to me on Primenet. I'll try and announce reservations I make here in the future. (Though some of the certifications did get booted off my prime95 for some reason, probably too much work queued up, but they got unreserved so they should be up on the list with its next update.)

That seems to be what happened. I couldn't see any of the certs I picked up as being assigned to anyone.

[ZacHFX]

Also, these are the exponents currently assigned to various folks but still appearing in the "NOT gpuowl" list:

PRP=1,2,61724279,-1 OR DoubleCheck=61724279,75,1
PRP=1,2,61883989,-1 OR DoubleCheck=61883989,75,1
PRP=1,2,62168443,-1 OR DoubleCheck=62168443,75,1
PRP=1,2,62168459,-1 OR DoubleCheck=62168459,75,1

[Uncwilly]

Originally Posted by ZacHFX

Also, these are the exponents currently assigned to various folks but still appearing in the "NOT gpuowl" list:

Thanks. The query that I am using for the 1LL and 1PRP does not filter for assigned. So any wildcat assignments or those automatically doled out by PrimeNet don't get caught automatically. I have updated the lists.

[ATH]

Took these and removed them from the list (only 4 I could not register on primenet 61.7M-62.0M):

PRP=1,2,101938999,-1 OR DoubleCheck=101938999,77,1
PRP=1,2,101943377,-1 OR DoubleCheck=101943377,77,1
PRP=1,2,102923921,-1 OR DoubleCheck=102923921,77,1
PRP=1,2,107867267,-1 OR DoubleCheck=107867267,77,1
PRP=1,2,107867719,-1 OR DoubleCheck=107867719,77,1
PRP=1,2,107951563,-1 OR DoubleCheck=107951563,77,1
PRP=1,2,108924077,-1 OR DoubleCheck=108924077,77,1
PRP=1,2,108926743,-1 OR DoubleCheck=108926743,77,1

PRP=1,2,111975401,-1 OR DoubleCheck=111975401,76,1

PRP=1,2,61761137,-1 OR DoubleCheck=61761137,75,1
PRP=1,2,61763263,-1 OR DoubleCheck=61763263,75,1
PRP=1,2,61822429,-1 OR DoubleCheck=61822429,75,1
PRP=1,2,62095669,-1 OR DoubleCheck=62095669,75,1
PRP=1,2,62368259,-1 OR DoubleCheck=62368259,74,1
PRP=1,2,62368309,-1 OR DoubleCheck=62368309,74,1
PRP=1,2,62379631,-1 OR DoubleCheck=62379631,74,1
PRP=1,2,62379643,-1 OR DoubleCheck=62379643,74,1

[techn1ciaN]

Madpoo has all of the Cat 1. Certs have completed for M60304547 and M60304591. I'm TFing M62016127; M62368351; M62168009; M62356573; M62371403 to 75 bits (ETA 8 hours or less).

[Uncwilly]

Originally Posted by techn1ciaN

Madpoo has all of the Cat 1. Certs have completed for M60304547 and M60304591. I'm TFing M62016127; M62368351; M62168009; M62356573; M62371403 to 75 bits (ETA 8 hours or less).

I picked up all of that as I just updated everything. I marked the ones that you are taking to 75 as if they are done (less work later for me.)

[ZacHFX]

Maybe a silly question, but would it make sense to add a worktype that is specifically for triple+ checks? It would need fairly stringent requirements (on par with Cat 0) but it would help catch problem CPUs much quicker.