Register FAQ Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

2016-12-26, 23:51   #2564
proxy2222

Jun 2016

17 Posts

Quote:
 Originally Posted by rudy235 Seems clear to me that if by 0 days to expire it means before 00 hours 2016 12 27 that 691110441 will expire. The other 691110411 might finish in time but does not seem probable. It is indeed a pity that being so close to 100% they fail to produce, but hopefully they might qualify for the 2nd LL verification.
FYI: I'm poaching 69110411, ETA: 35 hr. 69110441 just expired so if it gets assigned to a fast machine we should reach 70M milestone before 2017 :-)

2016-12-27, 00:10   #2565
retina
Undefined

"The unspeakable one"
Jun 2006
My evil lair

611510 Posts

Quote:
 Originally Posted by proxy2222 FYI: I'm poaching 69110411 ,,,
So impatient.

2016-12-27, 02:42   #2566
rudy235

Jun 2015
Vallejo, CA/.

24·61 Posts

Quote:
 Originally Posted by retina So impatient.
...let me remind you also that moderation in the pursuit of justice is no virtue.

Barry Goldwater.

ATH is taking care of 69110411

2016-12-29, 09:13   #2567
proxy2222

Jun 2016

17 Posts
70M done

Quote:
 Originally Posted by proxy2222 FYI: I'm poaching 69110411, ETA: 35 hr. 69110441 just expired so if it gets assigned to a fast machine we should reach 70M milestone before 2017 :-)
70M is done!

2016-12-29, 11:03   #2568
NBtarheel_33

"Nathan"
Jul 2008
Maryland, USA

5·223 Posts

Quote:
 Originally Posted by proxy2222 70M is done!
A mere 369 days after reaching the milestone of first-time testing all exponents below 60M, by far the fastest time between "decennial" milestones.

The new assignment rules are working extremely well, I'd say.

 2016-12-29, 11:08 #2569 NBtarheel_33     "Nathan" Jul 2008 Maryland, USA 100010110112 Posts Suggest that we add to the milestones report a countdown to completing the first objective of "classical" GIMPS (per the "colorful stats report"): first-time testing all exponents below 79,300,000.
2016-12-29, 23:31   #2570
Serpentine Vermin Jar

Jul 2014

37×89 Posts

Quote:
 Originally Posted by proxy2222 70M is done!
Milestone page updated.

2016-12-30, 22:51   #2571
petrw1
1976 Toyota Corona years forever!

"Wayne"
Nov 2006

32×7×73 Posts

Quote:
 Originally Posted by NBtarheel_33 Suggest that we add to the milestones report a countdown to completing the first objective of "classical" GIMPS (per the "colorful stats report"): first-time testing all exponents below 79,300,000.
Code:
Oct 25, 1999

Year	Pr.#	Factored	Two LL	One LL	Unknown	     Expect	P-90 Yrs
1999	38	1,622,684	102,184	95,493	2,810,514	6.08	43,144,037

Today

2016	49	3,004,289	910,033	641,519	   75,033	0.16	2,599,832

 2017-02-03, 23:52 #2572 rudy235     Jun 2015 Vallejo, CA/. 24·61 Posts Number 70284937 Hello: I see that number 70284937 has expired https://www.mersenne.org/report_expo...0284937&full=1 when it already had over 90% advance. This number took 90 days to get to 90% If that number is not kept as a backup (I am assuming that work on that number completely ends when it expires) then that 90% work already done –and that could probably be finished in between 5 and 10 days more– is lost. So a new user is assigned and also assuming it gets it done in about 6 days why is not the expired work continued and then we have an instant double check? If I am stating things correctly it would seem that the 90% advance will go to waste. Would somebody elaborate? Last fiddled with by rudy235 on 2017-02-04 at 00:04 Reason: Improving mangled grammar
2017-02-04, 11:30   #2573
ric

Jul 2004
Milan, Ita

2678 Posts

Quote:
 Originally Posted by rudy235 So a new user is assigned and also assuming it gets it done in about 6 days why is not the expired work continued and then we have an instant double check?
That's the norm. You might have noticed that - despite being expired on Feb the 3rd, the original assignee updated his progress on Feb 4th. Whoever comes in first, scores the LL result, the second puts in a DC - so no effort goes wasted, unless either one quits testing.

This has happened to me a few times, doing cat0/cat1 exponents: sometimes I went first, sometimes not.

And the juicier point "what if a number turns out to be prime" has already been addressed in some former discussion around here (IIRC, whoever comes first).

Last fiddled with by ric on 2017-02-04 at 11:32 Reason: typo

2017-02-04, 13:22   #2574
rudy235

Jun 2015
Vallejo, CA/.

97610 Posts

Quote:
 Originally Posted by ric You might have noticed that - despite being expired on Feb the 3rd, the original assignee updated his progress on Feb 4th.
Actually, (thanks for bringing that to my attention!) I had not noticed that. So we now have 96.6% completion and ideally then it will get done soon enough.

 Similar Threads Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post Googulator Msieve 73 2020-08-30 07:47 fivemack GMP-ECM 14 2015-02-12 20:10 bcp19 Data 30 2012-09-08 15:09 mklasson Msieve 9 2009-02-18 12:58 Dresdenboy Software 3 2003-12-08 14:47

All times are UTC. The time now is 03:08.

Wed Apr 14 03:08:32 UTC 2021 up 5 days, 21:49, 0 users, load averages: 2.83, 2.71, 2.44