GIMPS ECM Progress Report

[masser]

Would it be possible to add another table to the GIMPS ECM Progress Report? A list of the lowest incomplete exponent at each 5 digit t-level for both the "have known factors" and "no known factors" exponent categories would be useful to ECM users. Updating the table once daily (maybe less!) would probably be sufficient.

Here's a crude example (with values that may be 24-48 hours out-of-date) of what the table may look like:

[kruoli]

Our \(\TeX\) commands only support math mode, unfortunately.

[chalsall]

Originally Posted by kruoli

Our \(\TeX\) commands only support math mode, unfortunately.

This impacts our IPC how? Please explain the problem -- and possible solution -- spaces exactly.

JSON is very different than TeX. For very good reasons.

@Reader: Breaking the fourth wall... The above is meant to be funny, and serious, at the same time.

Have you ever had an argument with yourself? And lost? I have... 9^)

[kruoli]

Originally Posted by chalsall

@Reader: Breaking the fourth wall... The above is meant to be funny, and serious, at the same time.

Have you ever had an argument with yourself? And lost? I have... 9^)

So I would guess you have found the reason yourself?

[masser]

Originally Posted by masser

Would it be possible to add another table to the GIMPS ECM Progress Report? A list of the lowest incomplete exponent at each 5 digit t-level for both the "have known factors" and "no known factors" exponent categories would be useful to ECM users. Updating the table once daily (maybe less!) would probably be sufficient.

Here's a crude example (with values that may be 24-48 hours out-of-date) of what the table may look like:

There has been some movement on these bounds. Here's an update of this table: