mersenneforum.org  

Go Back   mersenneforum.org > Great Internet Mersenne Prime Search > PrimeNet

View Poll Results: Is January 1, 2021 the time to see the end of FTC LL's?
Yes, any requests for FTC LL should get DC's. 12 35.29%
No, leave everything as is. 2 5.88%
Yes, transition older Prime95 version requests to DC and newer to PRP 12 35.29%
Yes, but phase it in. Ramp up the DC rate handed out over time. 4 11.76%
No, but start having the server end every coms with a "Please Upgrade" note. 3 8.82%
Other, I shall make a suggestion in a post 1 2.94%
Voters: 34. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 2020-12-04, 15:09   #1
Uncwilly
6809 > 6502
 
Uncwilly's Avatar
 
"""""""""""""""""""
Aug 2003
101×103 Posts

22×2,371 Posts
Default Is January 1, 2021 the time to see the end of FTC LL's?

Prime95 v30 came out of beta in August 2020. PRP with certs are now the norm.
Any new FTC LL's will slow the project vs doing PRP's. Rather than waiting for all the machines doing FTC LL's to be upgraded, it might be well to have the PrimeNet server stop handing them out. If someone has a machine that can't run the latest version of Prime95, there would still be ways for a person to do FTC LL. But, the server should not hand them out. It would be good to set a date for the transition to happen. It could be a phased ending.

(Note: Discussion of forced, server instigated, software upgrades will no be entertained in this thread and are subject to deletion.)
Uncwilly is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 2020-12-04, 17:29   #2
kriesel
 
kriesel's Avatar
 
"TF79LL86GIMPS96gpu17"
Mar 2017
US midwest

22×5×251 Posts
Default

The poll close date 2021-06-22 is several months after what apparently is the proposed 2021-01-01 change in server reservation policy. That's a little late to inform decisions for action just weeks from now.
And, s/I shall may/I shall make/ in the last poll choice.

One could consider treating LL first test preference set in the prime95/mprime clients as "whatever makes the most sense" and then assigning LL DC, PRP, Cert, or P-1 according to the clients capabilities and resources and estimated completion times versus assignment expiration times. With plenty of advance warning. I suggest a minimum of 3 months; 6 months would be better for folks like curtisc with large fleets.

Casual users or Windows Service users may never see the please upgrade note.

Last fiddled with by kriesel on 2020-12-04 at 17:35
kriesel is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2020-12-07, 08:21   #3
LaurV
Romulan Interpreter
 
LaurV's Avatar
 
Jun 2011
Thailand

33×347 Posts
Default

Whatever you do, how do you deal with turning results in? I understand you won't assign LL and LLDC out, but one may still continue to turn-in LL and LLDC results without taking any assignments, especially in the 100Md area.
LaurV is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2020-12-07, 08:23   #4
piforbreakfast
 
Oct 2020
Terre Haute, IN

67 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by LaurV View Post
Whatever you do, how do you deal with turning results in? I understand you won't assign LL and LLDC out, but one may still continue to turn-in LL and LLDC results without taking any assignments, especially in the 100Md area.
That was my assumption as well. The LL test I'm currently running has an expected completion date of the first week of March.
piforbreakfast is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2020-12-07, 13:39   #5
Uncwilly
6809 > 6502
 
Uncwilly's Avatar
 
"""""""""""""""""""
Aug 2003
101×103 Posts

22·2,371 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by LaurV View Post
Whatever you do, how do you deal with turning results in?
The server will still accept results turned in. But, by not assigning new LL's it will cut down on the DC work needed in the future. Those with software that can't handle Certs can still contribute to the project doing DC's. There is work for maybe a decade or more doing DC's.
Uncwilly is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 2020-12-07, 15:08   #6
Runtime Error
 
Sep 2017
USA

5×47 Posts
Default

I voted "Yes, any requests for FTC LL should get DC's.", but with the additional comment that machines running first time PRP but unable to produce proof files should be phased out over the next few months too!!! Maybe give them only PRP-DC after a grace period?
Runtime Error is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Arizona Virtual School in Number Theory 2021 Nick Abstract Algebra & Algebraic Number Theory 1 2020-11-23 17:23
January 2020 what Puzzles 21 2020-02-02 14:11
January 2019 Xyzzy Puzzles 74 2019-04-09 13:34
January 2016 R. Gerbicz Puzzles 17 2016-02-04 17:00
Records in January wblipp ElevenSmooth 10 2004-03-22 01:26

All times are UTC. The time now is 23:34.

Thu Apr 15 23:34:01 UTC 2021 up 7 days, 18:14, 1 user, load averages: 3.08, 2.55, 2.26

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2021, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

This forum has received and complied with 0 (zero) government requests for information.

Permission is granted to copy, distribute and/or modify this document under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.2 or any later version published by the Free Software Foundation.
A copy of the license is included in the FAQ.