New {function, criterion, theorem, conjecture} for discriminant of congruence

[Uncwilly]

Originally Posted by xilman

If a man says something and there is no woman around to hear it, is he still wrong?

An observer does not prove or disprove a fact. Truth is truth, even unobserved.

[Batalov]

Is this thread in the right forum?

[Zcyyu]

Originally Posted by Dr Sardonicus

An introduction to the subject of "congruent numbers" may be found here: THE CONGRUENT NUMBER PROBLEM by Keith Conrad.

I have read the full text and this is the basic introduction.

Our paper is the latest results, please correct! Thank you,

[pinhodecarlos]

Go here:


https://www.scopus.com/sources.uri


Search for the highest journal impact number within mathematics and submit your paper for peer review, mersenneforum.org is not a journal.

[Zcyyu]

Originally Posted by Uncwilly

Can you provide a link to the paper or a pdf? English preferred.

A PDF of the full paper has been provided,

All theorems are current results. A new function, a new rule is also the latest result,

The types of solutions of the congruent number are groups ,
order of this group if 2^k k>=1

[R.D. Silverman]

Originally Posted by Zcyyu

A PDF of the full paper has been provided,

Not that I have seen. All I saw was an unreadable un-formatted mess.

[Zcyyu]

Originally Posted by R.D. Silverman

Not that I have seen. All I saw was an unreadable un-formatted mess.

dear:
please see article of dbf
all theorems be right,
all of them calculate pass through by computer.
thanks!

[Zcyyu]

Originally Posted by Zcyyu

yes, It is that "the congruent number problem"

the conjecture that all congruence solutions all to be a group and the order of the group is a power of 2, it may be one of the most important discoveries in the field of millennial congruence.

Dear:
Please download the full text of the pdf, (the format to start copying is very bad)
The results of this article are all correct
And all passed the calculation verification,
There is nothing wrong with the conclusion,

[R.D. Silverman]

Originally Posted by Zcyyu

Dear:
Please download the full text of the pdf, (the format to start copying is very bad)
The results of this article are all correct
And all passed the calculation verification,
There is nothing wrong with the conclusion,

It is the responsibility of the author to make the paper readable. Your knowledge
of English is far superior to my knowledge of Mandarin. However, the paper is
poorly written. May I suggest that you re-write the paper with the help of someone
with a better knowledge of English? You should also read the Halmos' book: How
to Write Mathematics.

[pinhodecarlos]

Originally Posted by R.D. Silverman

It is the responsibility of the author to make the paper readable. Your knowledge
of English is far superior to my knowledge of Mandarin. However, the paper is
poorly written. May I suggest that you re-write the paper with the help of someone
with a better knowledge of English? You should also read the Halmos' book: How
to Write Mathematics.

Agree. He should send his formatted paper to a native English speaker as we usually do.

[paulunderwood]

Originally Posted by Batalov

Is this thread in the right forum?

Maybe it should be in Abstract Algebra & Algebraic Number Theory as it is not related to Mersenne Prime mathematics.

Oops it is already in Number Theory.

"ABstruct" It would help if the authors put the paper through a US/UK spell checker.

Commas should have no preceding space character and a trailing space.

Try to keep to one font.

The use of red fonts makes my eyes bleed -- don't use them. Ditto emboldened characters. And Blue!