mersenneforum.org > Data processed dc and tc posts
 Register FAQ Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

2021-11-23, 14:59   #562
ATH
Einyen

Dec 2003
Denmark

17·191 Posts

Quote:
 Originally Posted by techn1ciaN I did message irowiki and got a response. He said that all of his testing is standard set-and-forget and M60800659 was indeed assigned to him automatically. Uncwilly, if you are consistently seeing him pick up exponents of interest to this thread, then there are probably just not many (if any) other people running the PRP-DC work preference whose PCs qualify for cat 0 FTC work.
60.8M is Cat 2, so it must be because his PCs does not qualify for Cat0+1 that he is getting them:
https://www.mersenne.org/thresholds/

and yes these categories should not apply to PRP-DC.

2021-11-23, 15:56   #563
techn1ciaN

Oct 2021
U.S. / Maine

22·3·11 Posts

Quote:
 Originally Posted by ATH 60.8M is Cat 2, so it must be because his PCs does not qualify for Cat0+1 that he is getting them: https://www.mersenne.org/thresholds/
I think you might misunderstand my point. M60800659 is a cat 2 exponent, but because of the PRP category problem, the server treats any PRP work on it as FTC and as cat 0. So, only someone who qualifies for such assignments might be able to register the exponent for PRP-DC. I especially believe this because my PC currently qualifies for at least cat 1 DC (I've obviously registered several from this thread) and I wasn't able to register the exponent myself when I tried.

Last fiddled with by techn1ciaN on 2021-11-23 at 15:57 Reason: Ambiguous sentence

 2021-11-23, 21:44 #564 techn1ciaN     Oct 2021 U.S. / Maine 22·3·11 Posts Another of the PRP-DCs I was working on got assigned out by PrimeNet when I was nearly halfway through it. It's clearly not workable for me to do these if I can't get AIDs for them. I'll release: Code: PRP=1,2,61478467,-1 PRP=1,2,61497461,-1 PRP=1,2,62328713,-1 PRP=1,2,62328731,-1 I'll try again in a month or so when I've returned 10–15 more results from the PC I'm trying to use. In the meantime, I'll pick up: Code: DoubleCheck=60108371,74,1 DoubleCheck=60178913,74,1 <- shift 0 DoubleCheck=60184249,74,1 DoubleCheck=62097043,74,1 DoubleCheck=62337227,74,1 DoubleCheck=63349159,74,1 DoubleCheck=63508751,74,1 DoubleCheck=62013199,74,1 DoubleCheck=61427269,76,1 <- shift 0 DoubleCheck=61549613,76,1 <- shift 0 DoubleCheck=60151753,75,1 <- shift 0 Will TF to 75 bits first where applicable. Last fiddled with by techn1ciaN on 2021-11-23 at 21:58 Reason: "<- shift 0" at incorrect exponent
 2021-11-23, 23:44 #565 Uncwilly 6809 > 6502     """"""""""""""""""" Aug 2003 101×103 Posts 100111111101112 Posts Lists updated.
2021-11-24, 01:54   #566
techn1ciaN

Oct 2021
U.S. / Maine

100001002 Posts

Quote:
 Originally Posted by Uncwilly Lists updated.
Most if not all of the new unproofed PRPs seem to be coming from "adamgm." I counted at least 10 of his results in the list with the most recent turned in yesterday. Has there been any attempt to reach out to this user and ask him to upgrade to a proof-generating GPUOwl version, or just do his DC work as LL instead of PRP?

 2021-11-24, 10:08 #567 Uncwilly 6809 > 6502     """"""""""""""""""" Aug 2003 101×103 Posts 13×787 Posts If you can figure out if they are a forum member, I would gladly PM them. I have no special power to look into the PrimeNet user info. Nor would I email someone who did not giver permission for bookkeeping emails. If you can figure out their email address some other way, then you can email them.
 2021-11-26, 19:25 #568 Jan S   Oct 2018 Slovakia 7910 Posts I took These: NOT gpuowl (shift 0) unless recent version with proof file generation: . . . PRP=1,2,62287343,-1 PRP=1,2,62328713,-1 PRP=1,2,62328731,-1 PRP=1,2,63244417,-1 PRP=1,2,64196413,-1 First two in this section are also registered. Last fiddled with by Jan S on 2021-11-26 at 19:29
 2021-11-27, 18:12 #569 ATH Einyen     Dec 2003 Denmark 324710 Posts I took these and removed them from the lists: PRP=1,2,109947373,-1 OR DoubleCheck=109947373,77,1 PRP=1,2,109947949,-1 OR DoubleCheck=109947949,77,1 PRP=1,2,110188987,-1 OR DoubleCheck=110188987,76,1 PRP=1,2,110307157,-1 OR DoubleCheck=110307157,77,1 PRP=1,2,111446129,-1 OR DoubleCheck=111446129,76,1 PRP=1,2,111894907,-1 OR DoubleCheck=111894907,77,1 PRP=1,2,62287237,-1 OR DoubleCheck=62287237,75,1 PRP=1,2,62287279,-1 OR DoubleCheck=62287279,75,1 PRP=1,2,62287319,-1 OR DoubleCheck=62287319,75,1 PRP=1,2,89876881,-1 OR DoubleCheck=89876881,78,1 PRP=1,2,90462271,-1 OR DoubleCheck=90462271,78,1 PRP=1,2,90888737,-1 OR DoubleCheck=90888737,78,1 PRP=1,2,93284179,-1 OR DoubleCheck=93284179,77,1
 2021-11-27, 22:36 #570 Uncwilly 6809 > 6502     """"""""""""""""""" Aug 2003 101×103 Posts 100111111101112 Posts I have reproduced my excel based system (that fetches the data and compares it to the current lists) in Libre Office Calc. Now I can update the lists while I am away from my work PC. A few new exponents have been added to the list.
 2021-11-28, 09:40 #571 LaurV Romulan Interpreter     "name field" Jun 2011 Thailand 9,859 Posts Re: Shift Zero: At the time cudaLucas was taking shape, i.e. before random shift being implemented, we had the same situation, people DC-ing with it expos that were LL-ed for the first time with it too, ending up in results not being accepted. At that time, if memory serves, we had a category of "don't DC them with cudaLucas", and also a thread here on the forum for organizing the work. I kinda was the initiator of that. Maybe now it needs revived (of course, in the new context).
 2021-11-28, 16:01 #572 techn1ciaN     Oct 2021 U.S. / Maine 8416 Posts TFing Code: DoubleCheck=59765711,74,1 DoubleCheck=60013231,74,1 DoubleCheck=60045313,74,1 DoubleCheck=60068419,74,1 DoubleCheck=60174901,74,1 DoubleCheck=60182981,74,1 DoubleCheck=60193613,74,1 DoubleCheck=60203873,74,1 DoubleCheck=62328701,74,1 DoubleCheck=63389441,74,1 DoubleCheck=63389701,74,1 to 75 bits. ETA 20 hours or less.

 Similar Threads Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post jasong Forum Feedback 1050 2019-04-29 00:50 10metreh Forum Feedback 6 2013-01-10 09:50 jasonp Forum Feedback 9 2009-07-19 17:35 edorajh Data 10 2003-11-18 11:26 Xyzzy Lounge 10 2002-11-21 00:04

All times are UTC. The time now is 03:58.

Mon Jan 17 03:58:18 UTC 2022 up 177 days, 22:27, 0 users, load averages: 1.05, 1.02, 1.01