mersenneforum.org Math knowledge of the general population?
 Register FAQ Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

 2020-08-16, 19:41 #1 The Carnivore     Jun 2010 3258 Posts Math knowledge of the general population? Suppose you picked a whole bunch of American adults at random and asked them the following question: You're on a beach and see a cruise ship sailing away from you. The top of the ship is 158.4 feet / 0.03 miles above the ocean, and your eyes are 5.28 feet / 0.001 miles above the ocean. Assume that the Earth's diameter is 8,000 miles, that it's a clear day, and that there are no boats, islands, or other obstructions between you and the ship. How many miles will the ship be from you at the moment when the top of it disappears over the horizon and is no longer visible to you? Round your answer to one decimal place. They're not allowed to use the Internet or any other outside help and are given nothing besides pencils and blank papers. No calculators, equations, theorems, or math textbooks. If they can correctly answer that question in less than an hour and can correctly show how they got that answer, they'll get a $100 reward. Under those conditions, what percentage of them do you think would win the$100? My guess is 10%, but I wonder what everyone here thinks.
 2020-08-16, 20:04 #2 ewmayer ∂2ω=0     Sep 2002 República de California 101101001100112 Posts Why waste time with idle hypotheticals when you can actually be out gathering some data? I suggest you procure some $100 bills and actually conduct the experiment you propose - find some group of adults who look like they might be willing&able to spare up to an hour for the chance to earn$100, say at the local coffee shop or whatnot, and see how many you can get to try your deal. Of course there is the chance that you might end up shelling out more $than you like, but if after, say the initial sample of 10, the numbers are such that yu decide to discontinue the experiment, then your question has been answered at least to a "at the place I selected, more than I would have expected" sense. Last fiddled with by ewmayer on 2020-08-16 at 20:04 2020-08-16, 20:23 #3 Uncwilly 6809 > 6502 """"""""""""""""""" Aug 2003 101×103 Posts 23×1,117 Posts Quote:  Originally Posted by The Carnivore They're not allowed to use the Internet or any other outside help and are given nothing besides pencils and blank papers. No calculators, equations, theorems, or math textbooks. So, you keep trig tables in your head? And you can't use an equation? So no math to do math..... Last fiddled with by Uncwilly on 2020-08-16 at 20:28  2020-08-16, 20:25 #4 Nick Dec 2012 The Netherlands 32·132 Posts It depends how many of them know about the iceberg... 2020-08-16, 21:22 #5 ewmayer 2ω=0 Sep 2002 República de California 3·7·19·29 Posts Quote:  Originally Posted by Uncwilly So, you keep trig tables in your head? And you can't use an equation? So no math to do math..... You don't need trig tables, but square root tables would come in handy. circle: x^2 + y^2 = r^2 Taking only + signed solutions, for given r and eps << r, we want to estimate x which yields y = (r-eps). For eps = 0, clearly x = 0. Assume the corresponding x << r, though this needs to be checked post hoc. solve for y = sqrt(r^2 - x^2) = r*sqrt(1 - x^2/r^2). For x << r, this can be approximated as y ~= r*(1 - x^2/(2*r^2)). Setting y = r - eps ~= r*(1 - x^2/(2*r^2)) = r - x^2/(2*r) and solving for x we have x ~= sqrt(2*r*eps). [I believe conventional notation for the so-called horizon problem uses h in place of my eps.] For the stated problem, we have r = 4000 mi = 4000*5280 ft and need to solve for 2 values of eps and add the results: eps1 = 5.28 ft, which = r/4e6, yielding x1 ~= sqrt(2*r^2/4e6) = 2*sqrt(2) mi. Approximating sqrt(2) ~= 1.4, x1 ~= 2.8 mi. eps2 = 158.4 ft = 30*eps1 = 30*r/4e6, yielding x2 ~= sqrt(240) mi. Now 15^2 = 225 and 16^2 = 256, so approximate x2 = sqrt(240) mi ~= 15.5 mi. Thus my answer rounded to the nearest int is that the ship will be (2.8+15.5) ~= 18 mi away from the observer at the point the top of its mast sinks out of sight. That took me the better part of an hour, so I would surmise that of a randm sampling of adults, for sure < 10% would win the$100 ... probably < 1%, but I don't want to overestimate my own abilities.

Last fiddled with by ewmayer on 2020-08-16 at 21:25

2020-08-16, 21:29   #6
Uncwilly
6809 > 6502

"""""""""""""""""""
Aug 2003
101×103 Posts

23·1,117 Posts

Quote:
 Originally Posted by ewmayer circle: x^2 + y^2 = r^2
Theorems are not allowed.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pythagorean_theorem

2020-08-16, 21:37   #7
ewmayer
2ω=0

Sep 2002
República de California

3·7·19·29 Posts

Quote:
 Originally Posted by Uncwilly Theorems are not allowed. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pythagorean_theorem
That's not a theorem, it's the geometric formula for a circle. If we're not even allowed to use that, well, then, we all might as well assume a flat earth.

2020-08-16, 22:26   #8
lycorn

Sep 2002
Oeiras, Portugal

142410 Posts

Quote:
 Originally Posted by ewmayer we all might as well assume a flat earth.
LOL... The folks from FES would need to start their answer by explaining how the ship could disappear at all.

 2020-08-16, 22:37 #9 Uncwilly 6809 > 6502     """"""""""""""""""" Aug 2003 101×103 Posts 23·1,117 Posts I had a FE'er explain to me that with a really good specific camera one could continue to see the ship. And when I tried to explain atmospheric distortion and the like, they went off. Since they did not like anything that they could not personally experience, I tried to build off of the idea of defraction and mirages. They would not stay calm to allow me to complete my point. Their claim was that gravity is not a thing it is just things stratifying based upon their density.
 2020-08-16, 22:50 #10 lycorn     Sep 2002 Oeiras, Portugal 24×89 Posts By the way, I did the calculations using very basic geometry results and came to ~ the same value as ewmayer. In my case, 18,32mi, which, according to the OP´s request, was rounded to 18.3 I don´t live in the US, do I qualify for the \$100?
2020-08-16, 22:57   #11
lycorn

Sep 2002
Oeiras, Portugal

24·89 Posts

Quote:
 Originally Posted by Uncwilly Their claim was that gravity is not a thing it is just things stratifying based upon their density.
So, at the end of the day both Newton and Einstein were wrong. Oh well, live and learn

 Similar Threads Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post ewmayer Soap Box 7 2020-01-05 23:10 Fusion_power Puzzles 10 2013-09-19 03:41 pastcow Factoring 10 2013-02-27 07:01 R.D. Silverman NFSNET Discussion 4 2007-07-19 18:43 Zeta-Flux Lounge 9 2005-11-28 03:42

All times are UTC. The time now is 09:46.

Thu Dec 3 09:46:10 UTC 2020 up 5:57, 0 users, load averages: 2.07, 2.20, 1.98

This forum has received and complied with 0 (zero) government requests for information.

Permission is granted to copy, distribute and/or modify this document under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.2 or any later version published by the Free Software Foundation.
A copy of the license is included in the FAQ.