20160310, 19:41  #1 
"NOT A TROLL"
Mar 2016
California
C5_{16} Posts 
Sequence of primes formation
I am trying to prove that there are only finitely many of the form k*b^n+c for relatively prime integers k, b, and c. I came across my first example, that there are no primes of the form 34*10^n+3 for n > 0. Is this true. If not, please show me that there are other primes of this form.

20160310, 20:16  #2 
Sep 2002
Database er0rr
5×701 Posts 
Code:
? for(n=0,200,if(ispseudoprime(34*10^n+3),print(n))) 0 86 154 
20160311, 00:55  #3 
"NOT A TROLL"
Mar 2016
California
305_{8} Posts 
So my record failed I take it?

20160311, 00:59  #4 
"Forget I exist"
Jul 2009
Dumbassville
20300_{8} Posts 

20160311, 04:43  #5 
"Curtis"
Feb 2005
Riverside, CA
11×409 Posts 
What are you talking about?
Also, do you know what "relatively prime" means? If so, why did you provide an example where the numbers are not relatively prime? Your statement of what you're trying to prove isn't precise enough. Do you mean you are looking for a combination of k,b,c such that there are only finitely many primes of your form? Or are you trying to say that for ANY relatively prime kbc there are only finitely many primes? You should look up what a Riesel number or Sierpinski number are. Or, check the conjectures R us subforum. You'll find examples of k values with *no* primes. 
20160311, 05:56  #6 
Romulan Interpreter
Jun 2011
Thailand
2^{2}·2,239 Posts 
What are you trying to convince him to do??!??!?!
He can't be bothered to read srsieve help (30 lines of text), and he has not a freaking idea what a file name is. You want to teach him integrals and programming? 
20160311, 06:02  #7  
"NOT A TROLL"
Mar 2016
California
11000101_{2} Posts 
Quote:


20160311, 06:10  #8 
Romulan Interpreter
Jun 2011
Thailand
2^{2}·2,239 Posts 

20160311, 06:19  #9 
"NOT A TROLL"
Mar 2016
California
197 Posts 
Awww... come on.... I had tested this form for months and now I just broke the record.

20160311, 07:38  #10 
6052_{8} Posts 
Hey PawnProver44, I know what you are up to just by reading all your posts. I see you want to find large PRPs or even just primes. You had the right idea of using programs like PFGW or srsieve, but don't constantly point out typical errors.... please learn to fix some yourself. Also, before writing a thread on something you are not sure about, look on the search bar first to see if someone else encountered the same problem. Too many threads or replies on the same topic isn't good. If you have a critical problem that no one has encountered before and you cannot do anything about it, then consider starting a thread. The problems you encounter are not really "problems" because it seems like you did not read what everyone else was saying important. LaurV gave you complete instruction on how to run srsieve, so you should be set there. Another possible reason you may be encountering problems running programs is due to your personal computer issues. Hope this helps you understand what you are having trouble with.

20160311, 07:41  #11 
230D_{16} Posts 
Also, Please do not start anymore new threads. With the posts you started, and you could just read carefully what everyone else was saying, you would be able to find several PRPs or primes by now.

Thread Tools  
Similar Threads  
Thread  Thread Starter  Forum  Replies  Last Post 
Distribution of Mersenne primes before and after couples of primes found  emily  Math  34  20170716 18:44 
Primes in nfibonacci sequence and nstep fibonacci sequence  sweety439  And now for something completely different  17  20170613 03:49 
Primes in A048788 OEIS Sequence  carpetpool  Miscellaneous Math  9  20170317 22:57 
Will GIMPS Ever Discover Two Primes Out of Sequence?  jinydu  Lounge  11  20090606 16:40 
Any other primes in this sequence?  brunoparga  Math  16  20060227 21:23 