![]() |
![]() |
#1 |
Aug 2020
2·3·19 Posts |
![]()
I am basically following the method in this post, but it seems that GMP-ECM still runs stage 1 for a long time, which is already done by prime95, before doing stage 2 which it is good at. Does anyone know where the problem could be?
An example of the output: Code:
GMP-ECM 7.0.4 [configured with GMP 6.2.0, --enable-asm-redc, --enable-openmp] [ECM] Resume warning, skipping line with no '=' after: [Sun Aug 23 21: Resuming ECM residue saved with Prime95 Input number is 0x249C4CFAABA959C8705B51C84281F03253A8524BE39CFD8FDAA914BBF71E457C8C9F3417ABCF9C23E7F708B91D373F46A5EC530FB55C95FF69C98E03678FCAD94860EC429B1FBEB76854487C4BB6C655EDD9B94B38021E11A3BBDEC6F4EA30CA54DF94CD321F61 (248 digits) Using B1=44000000, B2=4400000000, polynomial Dickson(6), sigma=0:2856607019773923 Step 1 took 170265ms Step 2 took 3675ms Last fiddled with by Ensigm on 2020-08-23 at 20:50 |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
"Curtis"
Feb 2005
Riverside, CA
3·1,579 Posts |
![]()
Try setting B1 of 1, and let B2 be chosen by GMP-ECM. It's pretty pointless to use GMP-ECM for stage 2 while restricting B2 to 100* B1.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 | ||
Aug 2020
2·3·19 Posts |
![]() Quote:
How to set B1=1 when resuming from the Stage 1 save file? I tried Quote:
|
||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Aug 2020
2·3·19 Posts |
![]()
It seems that my version of gmp-ecm can make use of the savefile produced by itself, but not that produced by prime95. When it reads the prime95 savefile, it is able to recognize N and SIGMA, but seems to ignore the fact that stage 1 was already done.
The file produced by prime95 has 3 fields: N, QX, and SIGMA; The file produced by gmp-ecm has: METHOD=ECM, PARAM=0, SIGMA, B1, N, X, CHECKSUM, PROGRAM, Y=0x0, X0=0x0, Y0=0x0, WHO, and TIME. Last fiddled with by Ensigm on 2020-08-24 at 09:39 |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Jun 2003
10011001101012 Posts |
![]() Code:
ecm -resume ecm_input.txt 44e6-44e6 > ecm_output.txt |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
Aug 2020
7216 Posts |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
Aug 2020
2·3·19 Posts |
![]()
Now the second question: how do I report number of curves done using this method, if no factor has been found?
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 |
P90 years forever!
Aug 2002
Yeehaw, FL
1CF016 Posts |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 | |
Aug 2020
2×3×19 Posts |
![]() Quote:
Thank you, but if there's not an automatic way then I'd rather not bother and waste the time of both of us. I don't have that much computing power to be worth doing it manually. Unless if I submit it like once half a year. Last fiddled with by Ensigm on 2020-08-24 at 16:14 |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#10 |
P90 years forever!
Aug 2002
Yeehaw, FL
24×463 Posts |
![]()
Yes, the few that do this kind of work, run 1000 curves or more and then email me.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
feeding back results from Prime95 | martinwilke1980 | Operation Billion Digits | 3 | 2017-11-17 07:34 |
GMP-ECM & Prime95 Stage 1 Files | Gordon | GMP-ECM | 3 | 2016-01-08 12:44 |
I've forgotten how to make Prime95 pay | Dubslow | Software | 16 | 2015-10-09 22:13 |
How to use prime95 for stage 1 & GMP-ECM for stage 2 | Prime95 | Lone Mersenne Hunters | 111 | 2015-06-13 03:18 |
Stage 1 with mprime/prime95, stage 2 with GMP-ECM | D. B. Staple | Factoring | 2 | 2007-12-14 00:21 |