![]() |
![]() |
#1 |
Oct 2006
11001112 Posts |
![]()
Hi, I have acces to an older PC (one of my parents'), it's an older model and not used very often. If I'll use it for PRP the most results would be doublechecks. Is this usefull, or would 'my' doublechecks-results be checked a third time if you decide to start official doublechecks?
I don't have every day acces to this machine so Sieving would not be very effectiv EDIT: Or are you already running 'official' doublechecks? If yes, how can I do this? Last fiddled with by masser on 2008-03-28 at 22:57 |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 | |
Oct 2006
7·37 Posts |
![]() Quote:
for sieving, what i would do is take a range far ahead of actual range (say 15000-15200 and let it run and each time you come to this computer, you can increase the range and post the results.) |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Oct 2006
10310 Posts |
![]()
Hm, OK, is there a way to run sr5sieve on a Windows XP system without opening a Window?
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 | |
Oct 2006
7·37 Posts |
![]() Quote:
maybe this app can help you: http://thethin.net/consoletool.zip Last fiddled with by tnerual on 2007-07-11 at 08:44 |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
May 2005
110010111002 Posts |
![]()
You mean running sr(x)sieve as a service? I thought that was not possible?
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
Oct 2006
1478 Posts |
![]()
Yes, that is what I mean, because my parents don't like opened Windows after starting the Computer
Last fiddled with by Rincewind on 2007-07-11 at 13:55 |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 | |
Oct 2006
7·37 Posts |
![]() Quote:
http://www.basta.com/ProdAppToService.htm or http://www.exetoservice.com/?ref=adw...FRAFEgodhRjM6A can run "common .exe or .bat applications" as services googling "running a dos app as a service" give a lot of results ! |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 |
Jul 2003
Behind BB
1,907 Posts |
![]()
The "All Things Doublecheck" thread at
http://www.mersenneforum.org/showthread.php?t=6289 has some information on previous doublecheck efforts. We have found many primes through doublechecking, but with the automation of testing with the LLRNET server, I suspect the chances of missing a prime are significantly reduced. However, having a double check queue available might be useful for slower machines. But it would be a lot more work for our statskeeper, ltd.... You could reserve a range to double check - say all n between 65000 and 70000 for the Riesel candidates. That would be plenty of work to keep a slower machine busy for several months. To get credit for the work on the stats pages, you would have to send the residues to our yahoo acct. If you follow this route, be sure to label your email as a double check effort. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 | |
Nov 2003
2·1,811 Posts |
![]() Quote:
BTW, even on an old machine you can find new, large primes provided that it can run a relatively long time. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#10 |
Oct 2006
6716 Posts |
![]()
OK, this all sounds good, I think I'll try some of the Sieve-ideas. Thx
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
primes, factors and doublechecks, Oh my! | ATH | Data | 0 | 2007-11-28 00:58 |