20200910, 17:48  #551  
"Ed Hall"
Dec 2009
Adirondack Mtns
4001_{10} Posts 
Quote:
*Has to be something to do with index 0, obviously. . . 

20200910, 18:43  #552 
"Garambois JeanLuc"
Oct 2011
France
2A7_{16} Posts 
OK, I'll make the change for this weekend's update.
Thanks Ed ! For this update, I won't be advanced enough in the calculations for base 50, I won't add it for the moment. Base 72 can't be added either because of the malfunction. For base 98, you can keep me informed if it is to be added this weekend or at a later date. Many thanks. 
20200910, 20:49  #553 
Sep 2008
Kansas
3447_{10} Posts 
Additional termination:
20^59 All of n=770 should be colored in. Releasing table. 
20200911, 02:22  #554  
"Ed Hall"
Dec 2009
Adirondack Mtns
4,001 Posts 
Quote:
Base 18 is green through 18^119 and orange for further by default. Base 72 is green through 72^74 and orange beyond, but I will still need to post the .elfs for the corrupted sequences. Base 98 is green through 98^71 and orange for further by default. I have not yet completed index 1 for many of the orange table blocks. 

20200911, 11:19  #555 
"Alexander"
Nov 2008
The Alamo City
2×379 Posts 
Releasing 21^72, 21^74, and 21^76.
21^78 got down to 42 digits in the midst of three separate downdriver runs, but it's now at 117 digits with a 2^2*7 driver and a 3. 
20200911, 16:59  #556 
"Garambois JeanLuc"
Oct 2011
France
1247_{8} Posts 

20200911, 17:09  #557  
"Garambois JeanLuc"
Oct 2011
France
7·97 Posts 
Quote:
OK, at the next update, I will add the base 98. And what do you think : is it worth adding base 72 ? But several cells may present an absurd result ? 

20200911, 17:13  #558 
"Garambois JeanLuc"
Oct 2011
France
1010100111_{2} Posts 

20200911, 17:23  #559 
"Alexander"
Nov 2008
The Alamo City
2F6_{16} Posts 
English translation (I don't speak French): For 21^78, you have now lost the 3!
No, there are almost 100 terms I have yet to upload. I'll do that now. Edit: They're up now. Look at the stinking 3. Look at it! Last fiddled with by Happy5214 on 20200911 at 17:25 
20200911, 18:30  #560 
"Garambois JeanLuc"
Oct 2011
France
7·97 Posts 
Sorry for the French sentence, it's a false manipulation !
Yes, indeed, the 3 is there ! 
20200911, 20:48  #561 
"Ed Hall"
Dec 2009
Adirondack Mtns
111110100001_{2} Posts 
That's up to you, but unless you are going to do the extra to supply links to valid sequences I'd recommend against adding the whole table. What about adding the table up through i=52 with a static note about the problem? The db has all the valid sequences and I'm attaching the correct ones for the ten that are invalid in the db. The top four of the attached ones are just factored through index 1. The rest are all the way to prime. So, any data retrieval can be accomplished.

Thread Tools  
Similar Threads  
Thread  Thread Starter  Forum  Replies  Last Post 
Broken aliquot sequences  fivemack  FactorDB  46  20210221 10:46 
Broken aliquot sequences  schickel  FactorDB  18  20130612 16:09 
A new theorem about aliquot sequences  garambois  Aliquot Sequences  34  20120610 21:53 
poaching aliquot sequences...  Andi47  FactorDB  21  20111229 21:11 
New article on aliquot sequences  schickel  mersennewiki  0  20081230 07:07 