mersenneforum.org  

Go Back   mersenneforum.org > Extra Stuff > Hobbies > Astronomy

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 2022-07-15, 17:23   #100
xilman
Bamboozled!
 
xilman's Avatar
 
"๐’‰บ๐’ŒŒ๐’‡ท๐’†ท๐’€ญ"
May 2003
Down not across

26·181 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by retina View Post
You necessarily have to throw away information to "fix" the images.

If you only care about the images being used for artistic purposes then go ahead and mangle them to your hearts content. But if you care about the science then you won't retouch them just to make them pretty.
Your first two statements are undoubtedly true.

The third is open to interpretation. By re-arranging the information you have you can make parts of that more prominent at the expense of the other parts. The now more prominent information can be of significant scientific interest. For an example of useful deconvolution, see https://britastro.org/observations/o...089659d4038718 and https://britastro.org/observations/o...cd9ab1092010e3

Last fiddled with by xilman on 2022-07-15 at 17:30
xilman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2022-07-15, 18:06   #101
kriesel
 
kriesel's Avatar
 
"TF79LL86GIMPS96gpu17"
Mar 2017
US midwest

31·229 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by retina View Post
You necessarily have to throw away information to "fix" the images.
No. Always preserve the raw data, and with good backups. I would argue that ignoring the diffraction transform is throwing away data and resolution.
Quote:
if you care about the science then you won't retouch them just to make them pretty.
It's not subjectively retouching them that I proposed, it's generating a scientifically justified corrected image, more accurate than the raw observation data, compensating for as much of the diffraction transform error in a copy of the observed data as practical. One could use observations of certain well known objects to generate reference corrections across the JWST field of view. See https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Point_...tion#Astronomy
Where I used to work, we would commonly calibrate certain custom-ordered instruments we produced, as well as measure reproducibility, to small portions of a microradian, over a range of a significant portion of a radian. (Resolution/repeatability to as good as ~1 in 2 million.) And we accomplished this with room air in the path of the calibration optics. That takes some care. Including knowing the errors in the calibration hardware.

Last fiddled with by kriesel on 2022-07-15 at 18:33
kriesel is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2022-07-15, 20:14   #102
xilman
Bamboozled!
 
xilman's Avatar
 
"๐’‰บ๐’ŒŒ๐’‡ท๐’†ท๐’€ญ"
May 2003
Down not across

2D4016 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by kriesel View Post
No. Always preserve the raw data, and with good backups. I would argue that ignoring the diffraction transform is throwing away data and resolution.
We are in violent agreement! That is what I do. It is also consistent with what I stated. If you check out the posted links you will see that they are two different ways of retouching the original data. If you wish, I can send you the raw data for you to reprocess and you may well do better than I. My PSF was a first-look and the deconvolution algorithms chosen because they are easily implemented rather than optimal by some other metric. The metadata lives in a PostgreSQL database and the raw bits on the backup-server here.

In principle, and I have no evidence to back up this claim, there might be scientifically valuable information contained within the diffraction spikes which is not currently evident but may be obvious after deconvolution.
xilman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2022-07-15, 22:15   #103
kriesel
 
kriesel's Avatar
 
"TF79LL86GIMPS96gpu17"
Mar 2017
US midwest

156738 Posts
Default

Re Hubble image processing: https://esahubble.org/static/project...processing.pdf
Since JWST images 0.6 microns to ~28 microns, anything not red or red-orange is false color for certain.
https://jwst.nasa.gov/content/about/faqs/facts.html
kriesel is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2022-07-15, 22:24   #104
retina
Undefined
 
retina's Avatar
 
"The unspeakable one"
Jun 2006
My evil lair

2×34×41 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by kriesel View Post
Since JWST images 0.6 microns to ~28 microns, anything not red or red-orange is false color for certain.
Of course. The images would be quite boring presented in real colour, since humans can't see the longer wavelengths.

Here is the real colour version of the image from the EHT.
โ–ˆโ–ˆ
retina is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2022-07-19, 20:02   #105
tServo
 
tServo's Avatar
 
"Marv"
May 2009
near the Tannhรคuser Gate

80110 Posts
Default Webb's first deep field image

Among the images released in the first batch was one that showed an absolute riot of galaxies.
This space.com's article explains what we are looking at.
https://www.space.com/james-webb-spa...e=notification
tServo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2022-07-19, 21:39   #106
Uncwilly
6809 > 6502
 
Uncwilly's Avatar
 
"""""""""""""""""""
Aug 2003
101ร—103 Posts

101010001001012 Posts
Default

Technically it wasn't even a deep field. It was only ~12 hours. A deep field would need to be about 4 x 24 = 96 hours. Once we start seeing those (and I don't expect one until after the new year) the astronomers are going to lose their minds. Also, once JWST does a collaboration with scopes working in other parts of the spectrum, papers will be flying out like the output of a line printer.
Uncwilly is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2022-07-19, 22:55   #107
chalsall
If I May
 
chalsall's Avatar
 
"Chris Halsall"
Sep 2002
Barbados

2·5,437 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Uncwilly View Post
Technically it wasn't even a deep field. It was only ~12 hours. A deep field would need to be about 4 x 24 = 96 hours. Once we start seeing those (and I don't expect one until after the new year) the astronomers are going to lose their minds.
Completely agree. Wow! What a wonderful time to be an observer!

Quote:
Originally Posted by Uncwilly View Post
Also, once JWST does a collaboration with scopes working in other parts of the spectrum, papers will be flying out like the output of a line printer.
Also completely agree. Including the engineering stuff. One mirror has already taken a signifgant "hit".

Everything is a learning experience.
chalsall is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2022-07-28, 01:02   #108
retina
Undefined
 
retina's Avatar
 
"The unspeakable one"
Jun 2006
My evil lair

147628 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by retina View Post
Why do the images have 8 spikes?

I can understand the 6 larger spikes. What are the other 2 smaller spikes caused by?
Found it.


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cWXTy_GeCis
retina is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2022-11-10, 20:07   #109
RMLabrador
 
"Chereztynnoguzakidai"
Oct 2022
Ukraine, near Kyiv.

1D16 Posts
Default

Open mirror of JWST is holy Grail and most expensive probe in the measure of amount a small meteoroids in the near Earth vicinity...
RMLabrador is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Event horizon telescope MattcAnderson Astronomy 1 2021-10-21 09:28
I run out of disk space - will this automatically now there's more space? drkirkby Information & Answers 5 2021-02-12 08:41
Telescope Porn (SFW) xilman Astronomy 21 2018-02-06 11:07
To James Heinrich Unregistered Information & Answers 3 2009-09-08 21:01
STS-125 Hubble Space Telescope Servicing Mission 4 lavalamp Lounge 11 2009-05-12 09:12

All times are UTC. The time now is 18:01.


Wed Dec 7 18:01:44 UTC 2022 up 111 days, 15:30, 1 user, load averages: 1.08, 1.03, 0.89

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2022, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

This forum has received and complied with 0 (zero) government requests for information.

Permission is granted to copy, distribute and/or modify this document under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.2 or any later version published by the Free Software Foundation.
A copy of the license is included in the FAQ.

โ‰  ยฑ โˆ“ รท ร— ยท โˆ’ โˆš โ€ฐ โŠ— โŠ• โŠ– โŠ˜ โŠ™ โ‰ค โ‰ฅ โ‰ฆ โ‰ง โ‰จ โ‰ฉ โ‰บ โ‰ป โ‰ผ โ‰ฝ โŠ โŠ โŠ‘ โŠ’ ยฒ ยณ ยฐ
โˆ  โˆŸ ยฐ โ‰… ~ โ€– โŸ‚ โซ›
โ‰ก โ‰œ โ‰ˆ โˆ โˆž โ‰ช โ‰ซ โŒŠโŒ‹ โŒˆโŒ‰ โˆ˜ โˆ โˆ โˆ‘ โˆง โˆจ โˆฉ โˆช โจ€ โŠ• โŠ— ๐–• ๐–– ๐–— โŠฒ โŠณ
โˆ… โˆ– โˆ โ†ฆ โ†ฃ โˆฉ โˆช โŠ† โŠ‚ โŠ„ โŠŠ โŠ‡ โŠƒ โŠ… โŠ‹ โŠ– โˆˆ โˆ‰ โˆ‹ โˆŒ โ„• โ„ค โ„š โ„ โ„‚ โ„ต โ„ถ โ„ท โ„ธ ๐“Ÿ
ยฌ โˆจ โˆง โŠ• โ†’ โ† โ‡’ โ‡ โ‡” โˆ€ โˆƒ โˆ„ โˆด โˆต โŠค โŠฅ โŠข โŠจ โซค โŠฃ โ€ฆ โ‹ฏ โ‹ฎ โ‹ฐ โ‹ฑ
โˆซ โˆฌ โˆญ โˆฎ โˆฏ โˆฐ โˆ‡ โˆ† ฮด โˆ‚ โ„ฑ โ„’ โ„“
๐›ข๐›ผ ๐›ฃ๐›ฝ ๐›ค๐›พ ๐›ฅ๐›ฟ ๐›ฆ๐œ€๐œ– ๐›ง๐œ ๐›จ๐œ‚ ๐›ฉ๐œƒ๐œ— ๐›ช๐œ„ ๐›ซ๐œ… ๐›ฌ๐œ† ๐›ญ๐œ‡ ๐›ฎ๐œˆ ๐›ฏ๐œ‰ ๐›ฐ๐œŠ ๐›ฑ๐œ‹ ๐›ฒ๐œŒ ๐›ด๐œŽ๐œ ๐›ต๐œ ๐›ถ๐œ ๐›ท๐œ™๐œ‘ ๐›ธ๐œ’ ๐›น๐œ“ ๐›บ๐œ”