20130201, 17:04  #45 
"Ed Hall"
Dec 2009
Adirondack Mtns
2·23·79 Posts 
Bummer! The bad news  the machine that assigns and compiles relations from all the others crashed.
The good news  all the other machines completed their parts. The missing range is now being sieved by the entire set, but not sure how soon I can get it uploaded  probably tonight... 
20130202, 03:08  #47 
Sep 2008
Kansas
2^{2}·821 Posts 
4850M is posted.
From remdups4: Code:
Found 3552598 unique, 21482 duplicate, and 0 bad relations. 
20130202, 05:24  #48 
"Ed Hall"
Dec 2009
Adirondack Mtns
2·23·79 Posts 
4648M uploaded...

20130202, 09:38  #49 
Basketry That Evening!
"Bunslow the Bold"
Jun 2011
40<A<43 89<O<88
16065_{8} Posts 
I'll take 4446M.
Matrix ETA when that 3844 block finishes. Last fiddled with by Dubslow on 20130202 at 09:44 
20130203, 23:15  #50 
Basketry That Evening!
"Bunslow the Bold"
Jun 2011
40<A<43 89<O<88
3·29·83 Posts 
Well, the filtering went weird... there are 106,330,986 raw rels, which I remdups'd to 90,469,046 unique (with ~5 bad rels), but when I ran filtering I got millions of "error 11" in at least two separate chunks of rels (one clump in the 11M region, another in the 82M region, and possibly more whose output I missed). All in all it only read ~78M (unique) relations to work with.
Code:
read 90M relations found 2742930 hash collisions in 78584372 relations added 122080 free relations commencing duplicate removal, pass 2 found 0 duplicates and 78706452 unique relations memory use: 253.2 MB reading ideals above 68222976 commencing singleton removal, initial pass memory use: 1506.0 MB reading all ideals from disk memory use: 1385.9 MB commencing inmemory singleton removal begin with 78706452 relations and 75158728 unique ideals reduce to 36237253 relations and 26360491 ideals in 24 passes max relations containing the same ideal: 35 reading ideals above 720000 commencing singleton removal, initial pass memory use: 753.0 MB reading all ideals from disk memory use: 1342.4 MB keeping 34193525 ideals with weight <= 200, target excess is 192519 commencing inmemory singleton removal begin with 36237256 relations and 34193525 unique ideals reduce to 36085410 relations and 34041566 ideals in 15 passes max relations containing the same ideal: 200 removing 3629799 relations and 3229800 ideals in 400000 cliques commencing inmemory singleton removal begin with 32455611 relations and 34041566 unique ideals reduce to 32178761 relations and 30530696 ideals in 13 passes max relations containing the same ideal: 193 removing 2671620 relations and 2271620 ideals in 400000 cliques commencing inmemory singleton removal begin with 29507141 relations and 30530696 unique ideals reduce to 29336594 relations and 28086355 ideals in 9 passes max relations containing the same ideal: 186 removing 2363397 relations and 1963397 ideals in 400000 cliques commencing inmemory singleton removal begin with 26973197 relations and 28086355 unique ideals reduce to 26828040 relations and 25975971 ideals in 9 passes max relations containing the same ideal: 174 removing 2197351 relations and 1797351 ideals in 400000 cliques commencing inmemory singleton removal begin with 24630689 relations and 25975971 unique ideals reduce to 24494234 relations and 24040345 ideals in 8 passes max relations containing the same ideal: 163 removing 1335768 relations and 1105202 ideals in 230566 cliques commencing inmemory singleton removal begin with 23158466 relations and 24040345 unique ideals reduce to 23107254 relations and 22883497 ideals in 7 passes max relations containing the same ideal: 155 relations with 0 large ideals: 673 relations with 1 large ideals: 710 relations with 2 large ideals: 10935 relations with 3 large ideals: 115280 relations with 4 large ideals: 662403 relations with 5 large ideals: 2273171 relations with 6 large ideals: 4858904 relations with 7+ large ideals: 15185178 commencing 2way merge reduce to 14147427 relation sets and 13923670 unique ideals commencing full merge memory use: 1677.3 MB found 7702363 cycles, need 7671870 weight of 7671870 cycles is about 537342638 (70.04/cycle) distribution of cycle lengths: 1 relations: 1100989 2 relations: 1016855 3 relations: 976231 4 relations: 860264 5 relations: 740361 6 relations: 635374 7 relations: 538777 8 relations: 445021 9 relations: 360699 10+ relations: 997299 heaviest cycle: 20 relations commencing cycle optimization start with 39547684 relations pruned 848951 relations memory use: 1352.8 MB distribution of cycle lengths: 1 relations: 1100989 2 relations: 1039607 3 relations: 1008635 4 relations: 876531 5 relations: 753570 6 relations: 638685 7 relations: 539933 8 relations: 440813 9 relations: 354547 10+ relations: 918560 heaviest cycle: 20 relations RelProcTime: 2737 nfs: commencing msieve linear algebra commencing linear algebra read 7671870 cycles cycles contain 22919148 unique relations read 22919148 relations using 20 quadratic characters above 1073741372 building initial matrix memory use: 3171.3 MB read 7671870 cycles matrix is 7671693 x 7671870 (2337.2 MB) with weight 734199137 (95.70/col) sparse part has weight 520621508 (67.86/col) filtering completed in 2 passes matrix is 7669404 x 7669581 (2337.0 MB) with weight 734119508 (95.72/col) sparse part has weight 520606495 (67.88/col) matrix starts at (0, 0) matrix is 7669404 x 7669581 (2337.0 MB) with weight 734119508 (95.72/col) sparse part has weight 520606495 (67.88/col) saving the first 48 matrix rows for later matrix includes 64 packed rows matrix is 7669356 x 7669581 (2249.2 MB) with weight 584705896 (76.24/col) sparse part has weight 512909036 (66.88/col) using block size 262144 for processor cache size 8192 kB commencing Lanczos iteration (8 threads) memory use: 2923.8 MB linear algebra at 0.0%, ETA 107h37m69581 dimensions (0.0%, ETA 107h37m) checkpointing every 80000 dimensions9581 dimensions (0.0%, ETA 108h 7m) ^Cnear algebra completed 18982 of 7669581 dimensions (0.2%, ETA 106h41m) Code:
commencing linear algebra matrix starts at (0, 0) matrix is 7669404 x 7669581 (2337.0 MB) with weight 734119508 (95.72/col) sparse part has weight 520606495 (67.88/col) saving the first 48 matrix rows for later matrix includes 64 packed rows matrix is 7669356 x 7669581 (2249.2 MB) with weight 584705896 (76.24/col) sparse part has weight 512909036 (66.88/col) using block size 262144 for processor cache size 8192 kB commencing Lanczos iteration (2 threads) memory use: 2572.7 MB restarting at iteration 621 (dim = 39285) checkpointing every 120000 dimensions9581 dimensions (0.5%, ETA 63h43m) linear algebra at 0.5%, ETA 65h16m7669581 dimensions (0.5%, ETA 65h16m) linear algebra completed 57246 of 7669581 dimensions (0.7%, ETA 65h34m) Last fiddled with by Dubslow on 20130203 at 23:17 
20130204, 05:22  #51 
Sep 2008
Kansas
2^{2}·821 Posts 

20130204, 06:09  #52 
Basketry That Evening!
"Bunslow the Bold"
Jun 2011
40<A<43 89<O<88
3×29×83 Posts 

20130204, 06:20  #53  
"Serge"
Mar 2008
Phi(4,2^7658614+1)/2
2^{2}·2,333 Posts 
Quote:
Remdups doesn't ask for the .poly or .fb file  so you could deduce that it has no way of figuring which of the relations (though formally fine in their formatting) are irrelevant to the project. msieve, of course, can do that and surely does. 

20130204, 07:35  #54 
Basketry That Evening!
"Bunslow the Bold"
Jun 2011
40<A<43 89<O<88
7221_{10} Posts 
It seems it's split into many more smaller chunks than I had imagined.
Code:
11604711  13030164 14803967  16175268 17944493  19274840 21029847  22200053 24071610  25127113 25781307  25892310 43131497  46224830 76554918  77215789 81046237  82590802 
20130204, 16:07  #55 
"Ed Hall"
Dec 2009
Adirondack Mtns
3634_{10} Posts 
It looks like one of my machines wasn't getting the correct poly.
(The nine chunks kind of of gave it away  I did nine runs.) Unfortunately, it had to be the one working the largest sections, too! Sorry! I'll try to slink back into the shadows for now... Off to see why and correct it!!! Later: I believe it to be fixed. Last fiddled with by EdH on 20130204 at 16:20 Reason: Accuracy and Followup... 
Thread Tools  
Similar Threads  
Thread  Thread Starter  Forum  Replies  Last Post 
Team Sieve #28: c162 from 4788:2714  jrk  Aliquot Sequences  27  20111025 08:51 
Team sieve #23: c172 from 4788:i2617  schickel  Aliquot Sequences  64  20110219 02:28 
Team sieve #21: c162 from 4788:2602  jrk  Aliquot Sequences  31  20101230 21:33 
Team sieve #20: c170 from 4788:2549  schickel  Aliquot Sequences  153  20101109 07:39 
Team sieve #5: c140 from 4788:2407  10metreh  Aliquot Sequences  77  20090527 20:39 