20211121, 12:36  #1 
May 2013
Poland
101 Posts 
GHzDays credit
5000111 has a factor of 10000223.
I tried to find another factor by three methods: ECM; TF and PP1. For the effect, see the attachment. GHzDays credit was calculated for two methods (ECM and PP1). For the TF method, no. The TF method has added value to the GIMPS project and should be appreciated with GHzDays credit. Something's not right here. 
20211121, 14:39  #2  
Jul 2003
Behind BB
2^{5}·5·11 Posts 
Quote:


20211121, 16:46  #3  
May 2013
Poland
101 Posts 
Quote:
TJAOI has probably tested all Mersenne numbers with a found factor up to the TF68 range, but it only reports results when it finds another factor. There is nothing in the example provided M500000003 that the Mersenne count tested was tested by TJAOI or anyone using the P1/ECM method. 

20211121, 17:39  #4  
Dec 2016
87_{10} Posts 
But it is also not disproven by it, so the example is quite pointless. Please take masser's advise and search the forum, there has been in depth analysis of TJAOI's work.
Quote:
Last fiddled with by nordi on 20211121 at 17:42 

20211121, 18:54  #5  
May 2013
Poland
145_{8} Posts 
Quote:
For example, I found a factor 6864212346810681024459763168 = 2^5 × 11 × 83 × 381233 × 1081139 × 57003029 + 1 by method P1 for 57003029 (B1=1800000). This factor didn't find user mgpainter who tested this Mersenne number for B1=605000 and B2=14066250. 

Thread Tools  
Similar Threads  
Thread  Thread Starter  Forum  Replies  Last Post 
Sealedbid silent auction: 1.1 MILLION GHzdays of credit!  Xyzzy  Lounge  53  20200703 20:56 
I'm new to GPU (36K GHz days)  fjcroderick  GPU Computing  7  20200110 01:40 
Formulas for calculating GHzdays credit  James Heinrich  PrimeNet  93  20120509 20:36 
GHzDays  nomad  Information & Answers  19  20110411 03:57 
GHz Days still at Zero  Unregistered  Information & Answers  3  20090202 01:15 