mersenneforum.org  

Go Back   mersenneforum.org > Factoring Projects > Lone Mersenne Hunters

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 2015-06-01, 19:57   #947
lycorn
 
lycorn's Avatar
 
Sep 2002
Oeiras, Portugal

144110 Posts
Default

Another one down:

UID: lycorn/asteroid, M27943 has a factor: 9595745432621621468883227471666940222487 (ECM curve 228, B1=3000000, B2=300000000),

132.818 bits

k = 3 × 7 × 2029 × 20873 × 575231 × 47418037 × 7077886967119

Not too rough, not too smooth. Just fine...
lycorn is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2015-06-01, 23:21   #948
aurashift
 
Jan 2015

11·23 Posts
Default

I keep seeing this thread on my way into LMH>100M

http://www.mersenne.ca/exponent/78282691

127 bits, do i win a prize?
aurashift is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2015-06-01, 23:39   #949
firejuggler
 
firejuggler's Avatar
 
Apr 2010
Over the rainbow

22×17×37 Posts
Default

thats a really nice factor
firejuggler is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 2015-06-04, 03:06   #950
PageFault
 
PageFault's Avatar
 
Aug 2002
Dawn of the Dead

5·47 Posts
Default

Nice find!

Are you going to do your others to B1=44000000? I did a test on my block, M25xxx, and got 27 curves per day. Quite an effort, to finish these 10 or so through to 17100 curves, several years or so ... I'll begin mass deployment in a few days time, is it better to do chunks of each on all cores or the full run on a single core? The latter will take over a year ...

I hope they come up with better hardware real soon, and that I can be positioned to make advantage ... long stretch needless to say, but I am determined. Am I crazy enough to finish this, and embark on the next B1 ???

BTW Stage 2 only takes 750 MB.

Quote:
Originally Posted by lycorn View Post
Another one down:

UID: lycorn/asteroid, M27943 has a factor: 9595745432621621468883227471666940222487 (ECM curve 228, B1=3000000, B2=300000000),

132.818 bits

k = 3 × 7 × 2029 × 20873 × 575231 × 47418037 × 7077886967119

Not too rough, not too smooth. Just fine...

Last fiddled with by PageFault on 2015-06-04 at 03:11
PageFault is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2015-06-04, 11:31   #951
alpertron
 
alpertron's Avatar
 
Aug 2002
Buenos Aires, Argentina

32×149 Posts
Default

Today my computer found a prime factor of the same size (133 bits):

[Thu Jun 04 02:54:08 2015]
P-1 found a factor in stage #2, B1=1000000, B2=30000000, E=12.
M955363 has a factor: 7315800908340060929629104157850801671121 (P-1, B1=1000000, B2=30000000, E=12)

k = 2^3 × 5 × 173 × 3733 × 4111 × 100361 × 102563 × 298631 × 11729009
alpertron is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2015-06-04, 23:06   #952
lycorn
 
lycorn's Avatar
 
Sep 2002
Oeiras, Portugal

11·131 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by PageFault View Post
Nice find!

Are you going to do your others to B1=44000000? I did a test on my block, M25xxx, and got 27 curves per day. Quite an effort, to finish these 10 or so through to 17100 curves, several years or so ... I'll begin mass deployment in a few days time, is it better to do chunks of each on all cores or the full run on a single core? The latter will take over a year ...

I hope they come up with better hardware real soon, and that I can be positioned to make advantage ... long stretch needless to say, but I am determined. Am I crazy enough to finish this, and embark on the next B1 ???

BTW Stage 2 only takes 750 MB.
I will do several tests with B1=11e6 for the next couple of months (exponents ranging from 12000 to 15000).
I will also pursue the quest for a factor of M1277, using Prime95 for Stage 1 and GMP-ECM for Stage 2. If you have a fair amount of memory available, you could also give it a go.

As for how to split the tests among several cores, there´s not a lot to be gained in doing it one way or the other. If I were you, I would probably do a mix: e.g. test 2 exponents on 4 cores, assigning 2 chunks of the same test to each core. That´s what I´m currently doing...

Last fiddled with by lycorn on 2015-06-04 at 23:07
lycorn is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2015-06-05, 01:30   #953
firejuggler
 
firejuggler's Avatar
 
Apr 2010
Over the rainbow

22×17×37 Posts
Default

a nice one down pm1 find
M78235639 has a factor 8803993906198449472411631 (82.6 bit, ) found in stage 1
k=5 × 43 × 131 × 3643 × 5827 × 94109

Last fiddled with by firejuggler on 2015-06-05 at 01:31
firejuggler is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 2015-06-06, 08:06   #954
Madpoo
Serpentine Vermin Jar
 
Madpoo's Avatar
 
Jul 2014

328310 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by lycorn View Post
I will also pursue the quest for a factor of M1277, using Prime95 for Stage 1 and GMP-ECM for Stage 2. If you have a fair amount of memory available, you could also give it a go.
I'm about halfway through doing P-1 on M1277 at:
B1=5,000,000,000,000 B2=10,000,000,000,000

Methinks it'll finish in a couple more weeks or something. I was bored and thought it'd be fun to allocate a few spare cores to P-1 work on smaller exponents, even though I know ECM would probably be more fruitful, or so I've heard.

I'm also doing these to the same bounds:
M1619
M1753
M2137
M2267
M2273

Each running on one core of a 6-core Xeon (while the other chip in this dual-CPU system is doing LL tests).

I started the M1277 run a while back so it's further along. The other ones will be a month or so before finishing up. Those last two are only at 14% right now.

Speaking of P-1, is there any consensus out there about the fastest program for P-1 work? Would gmp-ecm be something to look at for P-1 as well as ECM, or maybe something else (Windows based)?
Madpoo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2015-06-06, 10:54   #955
lorgix
 
lorgix's Avatar
 
Sep 2010
Scandinavia

11478 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Madpoo View Post
I'm about halfway through doing P-1 on M1277 at:
B1=5,000,000,000,000 B2=10,000,000,000,000

Methinks it'll finish in a couple more weeks or something. I was bored and thought it'd be fun to allocate a few spare cores to P-1 work on smaller exponents, even though I know ECM would probably be more fruitful, or so I've heard.

I'm also doing these to the same bounds:
M1619
M1753
M2137
M2267
M2273

Each running on one core of a 6-core Xeon (while the other chip in this dual-CPU system is doing LL tests).

I started the M1277 run a while back so it's further along. The other ones will be a month or so before finishing up. Those last two are only at 14% right now.

Speaking of P-1, is there any consensus out there about the fastest program for P-1 work? Would gmp-ecm be something to look at for P-1 as well as ECM, or maybe something else (Windows based)?
If you are doing stage1 all the way to 5e12 it's highly recommended that you take stage2 further than 1e13. Maybe 6e13~1e14 or so.

Yes, ECM is more efficient.

For large enough numbers Prime95 is faster in stage1. GMP-ECM is faster in stage2, depending on bounds and input size.
So in short; it depends. But GMP-ECM can be way faster in stage2.
lorgix is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2015-06-07, 16:13   #956
LaurV
Romulan Interpreter
 
LaurV's Avatar
 
Jun 2011
Thailand

13·19·37 Posts
Default

For how much ECM was done on these thingies, there is a very slim chance that P-1 finds a factor.
LaurV is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 2015-06-07, 19:46   #957
lycorn
 
lycorn's Avatar
 
Sep 2002
Oeiras, Portugal

11×131 Posts
Default

Yeah, Prime95+GMP-ECM would really be the best bet for the lowest exponents in Primenet ranges, specially for machines with large amounts of memory.

Last fiddled with by lycorn on 2015-06-07 at 19:46
lycorn is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Turn off GCC sse-using optimizations? ewmayer Programming 3 2016-09-30 07:15
AMD goes inane jasong jasong 18 2013-11-15 22:54
When I run PRIME95, my computer threatens to turn off Rafael Information & Answers 12 2012-01-02 19:38
A fond farewell rogue Lounge 10 2008-11-21 05:25
turn off your integrated Snd card in CMOS nngs Hardware 0 2005-05-20 01:31

All times are UTC. The time now is 04:27.

Mon Jan 18 04:27:01 UTC 2021 up 46 days, 38 mins, 0 users, load averages: 2.65, 2.42, 2.18

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2021, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

This forum has received and complied with 0 (zero) government requests for information.

Permission is granted to copy, distribute and/or modify this document under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.2 or any later version published by the Free Software Foundation.
A copy of the license is included in the FAQ.