mersenneforum.org  

Go Back   mersenneforum.org > Factoring Projects > Aliquot Sequences

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 2022-10-12, 00:46   #936
EdH
 
EdH's Avatar
 
"Ed Hall"
Dec 2009
Adirondack Mtns

5,261 Posts
Default

Sorry for the confusion. I think you made your way through unraveling it. That was the list of sequences that had been run once on my machines.


347^63 was run once, twice, because after my first run, you released it again in post 927.


23^123 was from the index 1 thread. The list I posted isn't separated by projects at all.
EdH is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2022-10-12, 02:26   #937
EdH
 
EdH's Avatar
 
"Ed Hall"
Dec 2009
Adirondack Mtns

5,261 Posts
Default

I'm going to queue up 337^63 for an overnight single run when 367^65 moves into LA.

I'm going to look at 331^63 and 337^65 tomorrow and see if I want to run those. I need to set up a few that will go through Thursday without intervention, since I'll be busy then.
EdH is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2022-10-12, 03:21   #938
gd_barnes
 
gd_barnes's Avatar
 
"Gary"
May 2007
Overland Park, KS

101110010011012 Posts
Default

Are you communicating correctly here? You're running a C161 on 367^65 before doing anything else? You said in the other thread that C149s were taking you ~5.5 hours. Wouldn't a C161 take you ~a day?

Regardless, if that is what you are doing, why are you running a sequence where the base has 2 remaining and the other sequence on the base has a C136? I'm just curious about your thinking here.

I feel like I'm missing something here. Could you perhaps be talking about the C136 on 367^63?

Last fiddled with by gd_barnes on 2022-10-12 at 03:25
gd_barnes is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2022-10-12, 04:28   #939
gd_barnes
 
gd_barnes's Avatar
 
"Gary"
May 2007
Overland Park, KS

33·439 Posts
Default

1184^54 terminates

Base 1184 is complete!

I'm happy to be done with that one!

I think it's safe to say that this sequence likely has the project record for opposite-parity sequences that haven't merged. The factor 3 remained for 124 consecutive indexes!

I had hoped it would be the longest opposite-parity without merge sequence by total number of indexes. But it fell short. I've had at least one in the 190s. This one only made it to index 177.

Last fiddled with by gd_barnes on 2022-10-12 at 04:28
gd_barnes is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2022-10-12, 10:00   #940
gd_barnes
 
gd_barnes's Avatar
 
"Gary"
May 2007
Overland Park, KS

1185310 Posts
Default

379^51, 53, 55, & 59 terminate

383^51, 53, 57, & 59 terminate

I'm still working on:
379^57 & 61
383^55, 61, & 65
gd_barnes is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2022-10-12, 13:05   #941
EdH
 
EdH's Avatar
 
"Ed Hall"
Dec 2009
Adirondack Mtns

5,261 Posts
Default

Correct - there's no method to my madness. Yes, the c161 took 21.25 hours with 7.5 of that LA. During the LA, my second factoring host ran the c137 for 2 hours and all was quiet when I arose. I didn't put any time into developing the next set of candidates, expecting to do that today, and I had already gathered some work for the c161, so I let it run. I was also curious how the diminished sieving work force would affect the overall run, which turned out to indicate not much. I suppose that's because such a large portion is LA which didn't change.

ETA: As for the smaller 337^63 (c137), as mentioned, I quickly grabbed something to test my second host script. I'll be trying to figure out some things differently today, so something(s) can run through Thursday.

Last fiddled with by EdH on 2022-10-12 at 13:13
EdH is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2022-10-12, 14:15   #942
EdH
 
EdH's Avatar
 
"Ed Hall"
Dec 2009
Adirondack Mtns

10100100011012 Posts
Default

I've formed my plan for the next couple of days. I'm going to queue three sequences from this sub-project:
Code:
367^63: 159/136
331^63: 155/148
200560490130^14: 159/148
followed by the remaining c149s in the index 1 thread:
Code:
60^87: 156/149
84^83: 161/149
88^93: 181/149
90^93: 183/149
92^86: 169/149
120^73: 153/149
276^64: 157/149
780^60: 175/149
966^52: 156/149
I left 367^65 for you to ECM and see if it is of interest now. If not, I'll fit it in for another run at some convenient time.
EdH is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2022-10-12, 17:58   #943
gd_barnes
 
gd_barnes's Avatar
 
"Gary"
May 2007
Overland Park, KS

2E4D16 Posts
Default

Great! Thanks for the explanations. It's interesting to hear about your process. 21.25 hours seem unusually fast even for you. I know you posted your various timings a few months ago but I'd have to dig awhile for the specific post. Have things been improved since then?

Before bed this morning, I saw that you had split 337^63 so I followed up on it. I ran it to t40 and nothing happened. So it's at 155/154/3/t40 and released. It doesn't look particularly good to me but I'll keep following up on whatever you split. I'll see what's up on 367^65 that I was harassing you about in a little while.

These exponent 63s in the 300s prime bases continue to be irritating. They aren't any good for the newest bases 379 and 383 either.

Edit: I found your timings from late July:
https://mersenneforum.org/showpost.p...&postcount=599

You were previously ~32 hours for a C160. That's a nice improvement!

Last fiddled with by gd_barnes on 2022-10-12 at 18:23
gd_barnes is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2022-10-12, 18:31   #944
EdH
 
EdH's Avatar
 
"Ed Hall"
Dec 2009
Adirondack Mtns

148D16 Posts
Default

I suppose there are lots of factors: quality of poly, time of day (how many machines for the sieving), etc., but here are the two c161s I have timing for:
Code:
Msieve Filtering: 00:51:22
Msieve Linear Algebra: 05:20:05
Msieve Square Root: 00:16:54
Total time: 22:39:46 (c161)

Msieve Filtering: 00:50:46
Msieve Linear Algebra: 07:22:30
Msieve Square Root: 00:21:03
Total time: 21:12:52 (c161)
The last one was over an hour faster, with less sievers, but it mostly ran during the day.

Actually, (now that you point it out) the change was probably getting adequate cooling for the GPU that runs LA, and that might explain why LA was longer for the last one. To cut down noise, I swapped back to inadequate cooling during the recent cooler weather. The hotter summertime may also influence the sieving machines. We'll see how they all perform in the coming cooler days.


ETA: I think the previous c161 timings was actually prior to me getting the GPU for LA working. That would explain a lot of the timing change.

Last fiddled with by EdH on 2022-10-12 at 18:41
EdH is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2022-10-12, 19:00   #945
gd_barnes
 
gd_barnes's Avatar
 
"Gary"
May 2007
Overland Park, KS

33·439 Posts
Default

Very nice timings! Thanks for the detail. Meanwhile...

373^65 terminates

One remaining on base 373. Guess which exponent that is.
gd_barnes is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2022-10-12, 19:10   #946
EdH
 
EdH's Avatar
 
"Ed Hall"
Dec 2009
Adirondack Mtns

5,261 Posts
Default

How many guesses am I allowed? I suppose I'll have to work that c152 in at some point. . .
EdH is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Unexpected termination of PM-1 Miszka Software 22 2021-11-19 21:36
Easier pi(x) approximation mathPuzzles Math 8 2017-05-04 10:58
Would finding a definate Pi value easier if... xtreme2k Math 34 2013-09-09 23:54
Aliquot Termination Question - Largest Prime? EdH Aliquot Sequences 6 2010-04-06 00:12
A new termination below 100k 10metreh Aliquot Sequences 0 2010-03-11 18:24

All times are UTC. The time now is 18:00.


Tue Feb 7 18:00:10 UTC 2023 up 173 days, 15:28, 1 user, load averages: 1.39, 1.10, 1.00

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2023, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

This forum has received and complied with 0 (zero) government requests for information.

Permission is granted to copy, distribute and/or modify this document under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.2 or any later version published by the Free Software Foundation.
A copy of the license is included in the FAQ.

≠ ± ∓ ÷ × · − √ ‰ ⊗ ⊕ ⊖ ⊘ ⊙ ≤ ≥ ≦ ≧ ≨ ≩ ≺ ≻ ≼ ≽ ⊏ ⊐ ⊑ ⊒ ² ³ °
∠ ∟ ° ≅ ~ ‖ ⟂ ⫛
≡ ≜ ≈ ∝ ∞ ≪ ≫ ⌊⌋ ⌈⌉ ∘ ∏ ∐ ∑ ∧ ∨ ∩ ∪ ⨀ ⊕ ⊗ 𝖕 𝖖 𝖗 ⊲ ⊳
∅ ∖ ∁ ↦ ↣ ∩ ∪ ⊆ ⊂ ⊄ ⊊ ⊇ ⊃ ⊅ ⊋ ⊖ ∈ ∉ ∋ ∌ ℕ ℤ ℚ ℝ ℂ ℵ ℶ ℷ ℸ 𝓟
¬ ∨ ∧ ⊕ → ← ⇒ ⇐ ⇔ ∀ ∃ ∄ ∴ ∵ ⊤ ⊥ ⊢ ⊨ ⫤ ⊣ … ⋯ ⋮ ⋰ ⋱
∫ ∬ ∭ ∮ ∯ ∰ ∇ ∆ δ ∂ ℱ ℒ ℓ
𝛢𝛼 𝛣𝛽 𝛤𝛾 𝛥𝛿 𝛦𝜀𝜖 𝛧𝜁 𝛨𝜂 𝛩𝜃𝜗 𝛪𝜄 𝛫𝜅 𝛬𝜆 𝛭𝜇 𝛮𝜈 𝛯𝜉 𝛰𝜊 𝛱𝜋 𝛲𝜌 𝛴𝜎𝜍 𝛵𝜏 𝛶𝜐 𝛷𝜙𝜑 𝛸𝜒 𝛹𝜓 𝛺𝜔