20220923, 13:28  #870 
"Gary"
May 2007
Overland Park, KS
2·3·11·179 Posts 
331^59 terminates
337^51, 53, 55, and 61 terminate Still working on these two bases. Last fiddled with by gd_barnes on 20220923 at 14:09 
20220923, 15:27  #871 
"Gary"
May 2007
Overland Park, KS
2·3·11·179 Posts 
331^61 terminates
Only 2 to go on base 331. 
20220924, 03:31  #872 
"Gary"
May 2007
Overland Park, KS
10111000100110_{2} Posts 
337^57 and 337^59 terminate
Only 2 to go on base 337. I am working on 331^65. That is the only remaining work that I'm doing on bases 331/337. 
20220924, 19:34  #873 
"Gary"
May 2007
Overland Park, KS
27046_{8} Posts 
331^65 terminates
Only 1 remaining on base 331. :) I'm done with bases 331/337. 
20220925, 06:44  #874 
"Gary"
May 2007
Overland Park, KS
2×3×11×179 Posts 
347^49, 51, 53, 55, and 59 terminate
349^51, 53, 55, and 59 terminate I'm working on new bases 347 and 349 as well as 21^121. Last fiddled with by gd_barnes on 20220925 at 07:26 
20220925, 12:08  #875 
"Gary"
May 2007
Overland Park, KS
2×3×11×179 Posts 
51^99 terminates
349^57 terminates 51^99 is the first termination as a result of the index 1 effort. As of a day ago, there were 15 sameparity changes as a result of that effort. I've worked on all of them and 3 of them are interesting: The one above and these two: 21^121: 142/135/3; I'm working on. 24^118: 163/163/(none); No known factor at t45! Ed, are you interested in taking a hack at the C163? :) 
20220925, 12:47  #876  
"Ed Hall"
Dec 2009
Adirondack Mtns
5,231 Posts 
Quote:
The GPU would run LA on the c163 in about 1.5 hours, while the CPU machine would take about 6. I guess I've gotten "spoiled" running this GPU. 

20220926, 11:22  #877 
"Gary"
May 2007
Overland Park, KS
2×3×11×179 Posts 
21^121, 347^57, and 347^65 terminate
21^121 is the 2nd termination from the index 1 effort. I'm still working on 347^61. 347 currently has 2 remaining. I'm done with 349. It has 3 remaining. I haven't previously taken on a C145 but I might take on 349^61 at 150/145/193/full later on. Other things are in the pipe right now. I'm also working on 780^52 for new base 780. I'm taking on the C141. The 4 sequences above that are tough. JeanLuc did a lot of work on it. I would have done this one anyway since it's a new base but it was also on the index 1 list so it should be the 3rd termination from that effort. Last fiddled with by gd_barnes on 20220926 at 11:25 
20220926, 12:25  #878 
"Ed Hall"
Dec 2009
Adirondack Mtns
5,231 Posts 
I'm going to be testing my db limits in a bit by updating the index 1 thread, this one and my local set.
I've also got to modify my current script. It worked a sequence that was already past index 1 last night, that it didn't need to. 
20220926, 12:38  #879  
"Gary"
May 2007
Overland Park, KS
10111000100110_{2} Posts 
Quote:
I'm asking because when I noticed you'd split one of those sameparity C138139140's, I'd fairly quickly run it through my usual process. So if it was the latter of the two above, it could have been my work on it past index 1. Last fiddled with by gd_barnes on 20220926 at 12:39 

20220926, 12:52  #880 
"Ed Hall"
Dec 2009
Adirondack Mtns
5,231 Posts 
Actually, I was mistaken (yet again). I thought I was working in the c130s and I have made it into the c140s. I will reset and see where I'm at after my update.

Thread Tools  
Similar Threads  
Thread  Thread Starter  Forum  Replies  Last Post 
Unexpected termination of PM1  Miszka  Software  22  20211119 21:36 
Easier pi(x) approximation  mathPuzzles  Math  8  20170504 10:58 
Would finding a definate Pi value easier if...  xtreme2k  Math  34  20130909 23:54 
Aliquot Termination Question  Largest Prime?  EdH  Aliquot Sequences  6  20100406 00:12 
A new termination below 100k  10metreh  Aliquot Sequences  0  20100311 18:24 