Some Somewhat Easier n^i Sequences Available for Termination - Page 65

gd_barnes · 2022-08-16, 00:04

Here are updated lists of same-parity sequences with current size < 150 digits, no known factor, and large smallest factor. There are some new sequences from the last lists since they now include all starting size <= 185.

Current size < 150 digits (all fully ECM'd):

Code:

75^93: 147/143/11
271^65: 147/146/3
30^106: 148/138/3
28^110: 148/144/7
109^81: 149/144/7
20^118: 149/149/3

We really worked this list down since last time. :-)

No known factor (ECM to t45):

Code:

131^87: 171/171
92^90: 173/173

Smallest factor > 1e7 (ECM-level shown last):

Code:

77^85: 156/146/1.04E+10/full
93^81: 157/149/1.90E+07/full
223^71: 159/152/3.08E+07/t45
23^119: 160/146/5.21E+13/full
1250^53: 165/141/6.61E+23/full
83^95: 165/147/2.38E+18/full
39^109: 165/155/6.64E+09/t45
197^75: 169/145/2.64E+23/full
722^59: 169/153/1.07E+16/t45
167^81: 176/149/2.21E+10/full
84^96: 183/158/3.92E+24/t45
119^89: 184/145/9.91E+10/full

10 out of 12 of these will drop in current size to their cofactor size after splitting. 1250^53 is by far the easiest. I may take it in the next couple of days.

EdH · 2022-08-16, 00:33

I have started on 92^90 and sieving is supposed to be done on Wednesday, but this will extend at least an extra day.

Thanks for all the lists. I will study them and see where we get. I am going to be tied up with very little time for updates, etc. on and off this week. I'll jump on when I can.

gd_barnes · 2022-08-16, 00:53

I added the < 150 digits current size list to my last post. I forgot the most obvious one.

Any place in my last few posts where I said opposite-parity, I meant same-parity. Also, the final statement in the last post should say:
10 out of 12 of these will drop in current size to their cofactor size after splitting.

EdH · 2022-08-16, 02:24

Quote:

Originally Posted by gd_barnes

. . .
Any place in my last few posts where I said opposite-parity, I meant same-parity. Also, the final statement in the last post should say:
10 out of 12 of these will drop in current size to their cofactor size after splitting.

I changed all these references for clarity in the previous posts.

VBCurtis · 2022-08-16, 02:27

I have factored:
57^99 C141
65^97 C142
113^87 C138

Factors are posted to factordb. My work continues on the list Ed posted in #684.

gd_barnes · 2022-08-16, 07:48

To give us a better idea of how far we've come, below is a list of bases that have had all of their same-parity sequences terminated.

Code:

2
3
5
6
7
10
11
12
13
14
15
31
41
42
43
50
53
59
70
71
73
79
242
251*
263*
281*
293*
306
439
450
496
578
800
968
8128
8191
14536
15015
15472
524287**
82589933
223092870
2147483647**
10000000019

* Recently initialized small bases: 102, 104, 120, 251, 257, 263, 269, 271, 277, 281, 283, 293
** Recently initialized large bases: 1352, 131071, 524287, 2147483647

Breakdown:
Bases currently on web page:
38 / 173 = 22%
Recently initialized small bases:
4 / 12 = 33%
Recently initialized large bases:
2 / 4 = 50%

Total:
44 bases completed out of 189 total bases = 23%

This was not an easy list to compile since I only keep a spreadsheet of sequences and bases remaining not ones completed. I'd certainly welcome any scrutiny.

gd_barnes · 2022-08-16, 09:30

120^88 terminates

EdH · 2022-08-16, 11:45

Quote:

Originally Posted by VBCurtis

I have factored:
57^99 C141
65^97 C142
113^87 C138

Factors are posted to factordb. My work continues on the list Ed posted in #684.

Thanks! Those sequences will update in my list, but they are now outside your interest range. 57^99 may be of interest to Gary. I'll pull them from the reservations block in post #1.

Quote:

Originally Posted by gd_barnes

. . .
This was not an easy list to compile since I only keep a spreadsheet of sequences and bases remaining not ones completed. I'd certainly welcome any scrutiny.

I normally pull completed bases from my scripts to save some time. I'm probably not going to have a chance today, but maybe tomorrow I'll run a full list, but it is affected by reservations so it may not be totally accurate, either.

gd_barnes · 2022-08-16, 12:14

Quote:

Originally Posted by EdH

Thanks! Those sequences will update in my list, but they are now outside your interest range. 57^99 may be of interest to Gary.<snip>

I did my usual thing on all 3 after I saw his post. 57^99 advanced one more iteration after his effort. It scores pretty well but there are others still that are better so I won't mess with it for now. The C129 was easy to give it full ECM. The others didn't do anything and got t40 on the C159 and t35 on the C163 respectively.

I'm working on 109^89. That C138 is a pain but it should terminate later today.

gd_barnes · 2022-08-16, 14:18

109^89 terminates

gd_barnes · 2022-08-16, 22:59

The following post 1 reservations were impacted by my recent effort to ECM/initialize everything up to starting size 185:

107^91: was 182/139 now 178/177
193^79: was 175/139 now 165/163
33550336^24: was 181/143 now 181/135
151^83: was 172/144 now 170/153
162^83: was 184/144 now 184/132

These were not reserved at the starting time of my effort, which completed a bit over a day ago. Only the C140s/C141s were reserved at that time. Hopefully there is not too much inconvenience.

Mike, the above had previously had no ECM. There are still some in the list with starting size > 185 digits that have had none. Just thought I'd make you aware.

2022-08-16, 00:04	#705
gd_barnes "Gary" May 2007 Overland Park, KS 10111000110000₂ Posts	Here are updated lists of same-parity sequences with current size < 150 digits, no known factor, and large smallest factor. There are some new sequences from the last lists since they now include all starting size <= 185. Current size < 150 digits (all fully ECM'd): Code: 75^93: 147/143/11 271^65: 147/146/3 30^106: 148/138/3 28^110: 148/144/7 109^81: 149/144/7 20^118: 149/149/3 We really worked this list down since last time. :-) No known factor (ECM to t45): Code: 131^87: 171/171 92^90: 173/173 Smallest factor > 1e7 (ECM-level shown last): Code: 77^85: 156/146/1.04E+10/full 93^81: 157/149/1.90E+07/full 223^71: 159/152/3.08E+07/t45 23^119: 160/146/5.21E+13/full 1250^53: 165/141/6.61E+23/full 83^95: 165/147/2.38E+18/full 39^109: 165/155/6.64E+09/t45 197^75: 169/145/2.64E+23/full 722^59: 169/153/1.07E+16/t45 167^81: 176/149/2.21E+10/full 84^96: 183/158/3.92E+24/t45 119^89: 184/145/9.91E+10/full 10 out of 12 of these will drop in current size to their cofactor size after splitting. 1250^53 is by far the easiest. I may take it in the next couple of days. Last fiddled with by EdH on 2022-08-16 at 02:17 Reason: add < 150 digits list

2022-08-16, 00:53	#707
gd_barnes "Gary" May 2007 Overland Park, KS 2⁴×739 Posts	I added the < 150 digits current size list to my last post. I forgot the most obvious one. Any place in my last few posts where I said opposite-parity, I meant same-parity. Also, the final statement in the last post should say: 10 out of 12 of these will drop in current size to their cofactor size after splitting. Last fiddled with by gd_barnes on 2022-08-16 at 01:52

2022-08-16, 07:48	#710
gd_barnes "Gary" May 2007 Overland Park, KS 27060₈ Posts	To give us a better idea of how far we've come, below is a list of bases that have had all of their same-parity sequences terminated. Code: 2 3 5 6 7 10 11 12 13 14 15 31 41 42 43 50 53 59 70 71 73 79 242 251* 263* 281* 293* 306 439 450 496 578 800 968 8128 8191 14536 15015 15472 524287 82589933 223092870 2147483647 10000000019 * Recently initialized small bases: 102, 104, 120, 251, 257, 263, 269, 271, 277, 281, 283, 293 ** Recently initialized large bases: 1352, 131071, 524287, 2147483647 Breakdown: Bases currently on web page: 38 / 173 = 22% Recently initialized small bases: 4 / 12 = 33% Recently initialized large bases: 2 / 4 = 50% Total: 44 bases completed out of 189 total bases = 23% This was not an easy list to compile since I only keep a spreadsheet of sequences and bases remaining not ones completed. I'd certainly welcome any scrutiny.

Similar Threads
Thread	Thread Starter	Forum	Replies	Last Post
Unexpected termination of PM-1	Miszka	Software	22	2021-11-19 21:36
Easier pi(x) approximation	mathPuzzles	Math	8	2017-05-04 10:58
Would finding a definate Pi value easier if...	xtreme2k	Math	34	2013-09-09 23:54
Aliquot Termination Question - Largest Prime?	EdH	Aliquot Sequences	6	2010-04-06 00:12
A new termination below 100k	10metreh	Aliquot Sequences	0	2010-03-11 18:24

2022-08-16, 00:33	#706
EdH "Ed Hall" Dec 2009 Adirondack Mtns 2×2,621 Posts	I have started on 92^90 and sieving is supposed to be done on Wednesday, but this will extend at least an extra day. Thanks for all the lists. I will study them and see where we get. I am going to be tied up with very little time for updates, etc. on and off this week. I'll jump on when I can.

2022-08-16, 02:27	#709
VBCurtis "Curtis" Feb 2005 Riverside, CA 3·1,879 Posts	I have factored: 57^99 C141 65^97 C142 113^87 C138 Factors are posted to factordb. My work continues on the list Ed posted in #684.

2022-08-16, 09:30	#711
gd_barnes "Gary" May 2007 Overland Park, KS 2⁴·739 Posts	120^88 terminates

2022-08-16, 14:18	#714
gd_barnes "Gary" May 2007 Overland Park, KS 2E30₁₆ Posts	109^89 terminates

2022-08-16, 22:59	#715
gd_barnes "Gary" May 2007 Overland Park, KS 27060₈ Posts	The following post 1 reservations were impacted by my recent effort to ECM/initialize everything up to starting size 185: 107^91: was 182/139 now 178/177 193^79: was 175/139 now 165/163 33550336^24: was 181/143 now 181/135 151^83: was 172/144 now 170/153 162^83: was 184/144 now 184/132 These were not reserved at the starting time of my effort, which completed a bit over a day ago. Only the C140s/C141s were reserved at that time. Hopefully there is not too much inconvenience. Mike, the above had previously had no ECM. There are still some in the list with starting size > 185 digits that have had none. Just thought I'd make you aware.