20221012, 17:27  #1992  
"Gary"
May 2007
Overland Park, KS
13×907 Posts 
Quote:
Quote:
Last fiddled with by gd_barnes on 20221012 at 17:36 

20221012, 17:36  #1993 
"Gary"
May 2007
Overland Park, KS
13·907 Posts 
Bases 70 to 79 have now had their large oppositeparity exponents initialized.
Also included in this initialization were new bases 353, 359, 367, 373, 373, 379, 383, 888, and 1264460. Out of all of these new bases, I think that only base 1264460 still needs to be updated. 
20221012, 18:30  #1994 
"Garambois JeanLuc"
Oct 2011
France
435_{16} Posts 
I'm sorry, but I really don't have time to do a full update right now.
I shouldn't have even made this update today ! But as I had said above, I will do that in 10 days, it will be better for me. Because I will have to do a clean job and check several things. ;) 
20221012, 19:02  #1995 
"Ed Hall"
Dec 2009
Adirondack Mtns
5210_{10} Posts 
Thanks for all your work, JeanLuc! You cleared most of the other thread's current terminations and now I can remove some bases from my scripts. That should allow them to update a little faster.

20221012, 20:09  #1996  
"Gary"
May 2007
Overland Park, KS
13·907 Posts 
Quote:


20221013, 21:48  #1997 
Sep 2008
Kansas
ED4_{16} Posts 
Bases 389 and 397 can be added at the next update.

20221015, 07:13  #1998 
"Gary"
May 2007
Overland Park, KS
13·907 Posts 
397^46 terminated by me.

20221015, 16:09  #1999 
"Garambois JeanLuc"
Oct 2011
France
3×359 Posts 
Page updated.
Many thanks to all for your work ! Added bases : 389, 397. Some bases updated according to what was requested in the project thread from post #1992. But I haven't checked anything due to time constraints, I hope everything is OK ! Of course, as I had announced, within a week, I will make a very complete update of the page. 
20221016, 00:14  #2000 
"Gary"
May 2007
Overland Park, KS
27017_{8} Posts 
Bases 50 to 69 have now had their large oppositeparity exponents initialized.
Also included in this initialization were new bases 389, 397, and 996. 
20221016, 04:56  #2001 
"Gary"
May 2007
Overland Park, KS
2E0F_{16} Posts 
Reserving new base 40320. I'd like to extend the factorial bases and I see that base 5040 is being worked on.
JeanLuc, can I assume that exponent 35 will be the highest exponent shown for this base on your page? 40320^35 is 162 digits. I'm asking because it falls between bases 31704 and 131071, which have exponents up to 40 and 35 respectively shown on your page. 
20221016, 07:36  #2002  
"Garambois JeanLuc"
Oct 2011
France
3×359 Posts 
Quote:
35 is fine if you decide to do so. I might have placed the exponent change from 40 to 35 from base 50,000 myself, but 40320^38 has the 3 in its factors, which makes it a terrible sequence ! As for 40320^40, with cofactors over 180 digits long, that scares the hell out of me. 

Thread Tools  
Similar Threads  
Thread  Thread Starter  Forum  Replies  Last Post 
Broken aliquot sequences  fivemack  FactorDB  46  20210221 10:46 
Broken aliquot sequences  schickel  FactorDB  18  20130612 16:09 
A new theorem about aliquot sequences  garambois  Aliquot Sequences  34  20120610 21:53 
poaching aliquot sequences...  Andi47  FactorDB  21  20111229 21:11 
New article on aliquot sequences  schickel  mersennewiki  0  20081230 07:07 