20220918, 08:25  #1904 
"Garambois JeanLuc"
Oct 2011
France
1,087 Posts 
I have good news :
All of Karsten's, Edwin's and my results match. Our programs are good ! The only differences between our results come from the fact that we did not do our scans at the same time and that in the meantime sequences were added for some primes. 
20220918, 08:27  #1905  
"Garambois JeanLuc"
Oct 2011
France
1,087 Posts 
Quote:
Base 317 will be added to the page next week. 

20220918, 08:54  #1906  
"Garambois JeanLuc"
Oct 2011
France
1,087 Posts 
Quote:
But these works are often limited by the non matching parity sequences for which we are only at index 1 ! Because interesting things happen between the index term 1 and 2. For bases 3 and 5, we do not have this problem, but for base 6, the problem starts to appear with the sequences 6^189, 6^207 and 6^209. For the sequences with non corresponding parity, it is therefore interesting to try to remove all these 1's and to have instead 2's or 3's, which allows to do interesting things. Quote:
I know there are a lot of people who occasionally follow this thread. If any reader has an idea or question, please feel free to ask. Any idea is interesting and can start us on a new track. Don't be afraid to ask questions, even if you think it seems too trivial. We can often come up with very interesting things with trivial questions. And if the question is more complicated, don't hesitate either. If I don't understand it, there will always be someone who does and it will give them ideas. 

20220918, 16:21  #1907 
"Ed Hall"
Dec 2009
Adirondack Mtns
1484_{16} Posts 
Good news, indeed  thanks!

20220918, 16:35  #1908  
"Ed Hall"
Dec 2009
Adirondack Mtns
2^{2}·13·101 Posts 
Quote:
Code:
1242103 sequences found for 41 1893305 sequences found for 43 1298078 sequences found for 59 

20220919, 02:25  #1909 
"Gary"
May 2007
Overland Park, KS
2^{2}×2,957 Posts 
I have initialized middlesized to large oppositeparity exponents to a cofactor >= 110 digits for all bases 100 thru 195.
All bases in that range were affected with the exception of doublesquare base 162. Also done were newly added bases 396 and 696. Attached is a document of the specific affected sequences. I'm continuing with this effort for bases < 100. 
20220919, 12:50  #1910 
Sep 2008
Kansas
2^{5}×7×17 Posts 
Bases 311 and 313 can be added at the next update.

20220919, 14:29  #1911 
"Rich"
Aug 2002
Benicia, California
2^{4}·101 Posts 
I'll reserve 34^105

20220919, 17:03  #1912 
Oct 2006
Berlin, Germany
659 Posts 
I'll take bases 76, 78 and 79.
77 is reserved by JeanLuc Garambois. yoyo 
20220919, 18:02  #1913 
"Ed Hall"
Dec 2009
Adirondack Mtns
2^{2}·13·101 Posts 
The new thread has been created and I realized a way to use a different post as the first, so I won't need to edit someone else's. The new thread is at Index 1 Sequence Work for the "n^i" Aliquot Project. I'll update the list from time to time with added bases and removed sequences.

20220919, 19:34  #1914 
"Garambois JeanLuc"
Oct 2011
France
1,087 Posts 
@Gary, RichD, richs, yoyo :
Thank you very much for your work, your reservations, your initializations. All of this will be on the page when we next update it in less than a week. @Edwin : Thank you very much for starting the new subproject thread to move the sequences from index 1 to a higher index ! 
Thread Tools  
Similar Threads  
Thread  Thread Starter  Forum  Replies  Last Post 
Broken aliquot sequences  fivemack  FactorDB  46  20210221 10:46 
Broken aliquot sequences  schickel  FactorDB  18  20130612 16:09 
A new theorem about aliquot sequences  garambois  Aliquot Sequences  34  20120610 21:53 
poaching aliquot sequences...  Andi47  FactorDB  21  20111229 21:11 
New article on aliquot sequences  schickel  mersennewiki  0  20081230 07:07 