mersenneforum.org  

Go Back   mersenneforum.org > Great Internet Mersenne Prime Search > Hardware

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 2003-10-28, 02:37   #1
PLeopard
 
Jan 2003

710 Posts
Default slow iteration times

The iteration times for my machine (when left idle) are 0.197 at the lowest. That corresponds to an Athlon XP 1800+ approximately. I'm running a 2400+! what's going on?

My system specs are as follows:

Athlon XP 2400+ (2000MHz) - 266MHz FSB
512MB PC2100
ECS K7S5A (SiS 735 chipset)

not very relevant:
GeForce FX 5200 128MB
Maxtor 80GB 7200rpm
onboard sound

All the latest drivers
PLeopard is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2003-10-28, 04:25   #2
dsouza123
 
dsouza123's Avatar
 
Sep 2002

2·331 Posts
Default

Things that can slow prime95 down ( if running Windows )

Video card resolution and color depth.
A screen saver.
Another process running in idle contending for the cycles. ( Another distributed project )
AntiVirus software ( more than 1 at a time has a dramatic effect )
Some legitimate service or other background process.
A virus/trojan/worm/spyware.
ActiveX applets running in a browser.
The version of Windows 98,ME,2000,XP
Very large number of processes running so task switching eating alot of CPU cycles.
Time slice too small, not much done before switching so high CPU overhead.
WinModem, CPU has to do all calcs that a dedicated chip would do.
CPU heavy driver.
Not enough memory ( OS has to use HD for virtual RAM ).
dsouza123 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2003-10-28, 04:35   #3
dsouza123
 
dsouza123's Avatar
 
Sep 2002

10100101102 Posts
Default

Forgot these.

Version of prime95, some are much slower/faster.
The size of the Mersenne number working with.
Number of banks of memory used. Single, pair, 2 pairs, are they all matched ?, using unmatched in any way ( speed, size ) has a big effect.
dsouza123 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2003-10-28, 05:17   #4
PLeopard
 
Jan 2003

716 Posts
Default

Thanks for your response!
I've got most of those factors minimized.
The tests I've done are with everything pretty much idle. I disable as much as I can before going to school each day and take a look at the iteration times when I return.. They're what I would expect from a maching about 400 to 500MHz lower. However, I have no idea what those benchmark iteration times are based on.. WinXP? version of Prime 95? so.... I won't complain :)
PLeopard is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2003-10-28, 10:10   #5
lycorn
 
lycorn's Avatar
 
"GIMFS"
Sep 2002
Oeiras, Portugal

2·5·157 Posts
Default

If you´re referring to the Benchmarks shown in GIMPS "Benchmarks" page, those are based upon version 21 of the program. This means they are worse than what is currently expected, with more efficient versions around. So, the timings you obtained are in fact not corresponding to a XP1800+, but to something even slower.
That said, you may have processes you are not aware of running in the background, and stealing CPU cycles from P95. Try installing TaskInfo or some similar utility, that allows you to keep track of every process running. Your PC may have been victim of some malicious code, sent via email or screen saver, that has installed a program that consumes machine resources. That happened to me once, and mind you, I had that latest version of the antivirus installed! It was a screen saver that had the code. The PC was very slow, unstable, and it wasn´t until I found that odd process running that was able to solve the problem.
Just my $0.02...
lycorn is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2003-10-28, 17:00   #6
markhl
 
Apr 2003
California

5C16 Posts
Default

I agree that video settings make a difference. Use the lowest refresh rate, resolution, and color depth that you can stand. See if that helps!
markhl is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2003-10-28, 20:10   #7
PrimeCruncher
 
PrimeCruncher's Avatar
 
Sep 2003
Borg HQ, Delta Quadrant

2·33·13 Posts
Default

Have you tried upping the priority of Prime95? By default it runs at 1 which is the lowest. I usually set mine to 8 since 9 is the default for most apps. But that will put it safely above the screensaver and maybe some other stuff that might steal cycles.
PrimeCruncher is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2003-10-28, 20:48   #8
markhl
 
Apr 2003
California

5C16 Posts
Default

Please post your version of Prime95.
What exponent are you working on?

Also see these threads:

Software > Slow iteration times with 23.7
Software > System tweaks to speed GIMPS
Hardware > Motherboard replaced - now goes slower
Hardware > What's your per iteration time?
Hardware > computer seems to LAg when Prime95 is running

Animated GIFs can also slow you down a lot.
However I imagine you've closed down other apps.
markhl is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2003-10-28, 21:59   #9
QuintLeo
 
QuintLeo's Avatar
 
Oct 2002
Lost in the hills of Iowa

44810 Posts
Default

I pull about .175 with one of my XP1800+ - but it's overclocked to appx. 1800 Mhz (XP2200+ range) at 175ish on the FSB, running PC2700 for RAM and nothing else running on the machine at those timings.

I suspect your XP2400 is hampered a little by the SIS chipset (they're not known for being the most efficient, vs. NForce and most VIA solutions) and you might have more services running than you need, or something running in the background, or an old Prime version, or a combination of the above.
QuintLeo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2003-10-29, 05:48   #10
PLeopard
 
Jan 2003

7 Posts
Default

I'm running version 23.7.1
Exponent 33512231

Lowest iteration time of 0.197

I'm looking into spyware, program priority, etc. I just haven't had much time lately.

Thanks for all the suggestions.
PLeopard is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Iteration times in i5 and i7 Jud McCranie Information & Answers 53 2013-08-17 19:09
What are your per-iteration times? LiquidNitrogen Hardware 22 2011-07-12 23:15
Iteration times slow compared to benchmark cd1940 Software 4 2004-07-05 17:55
LLR.exe FFT crossovers and iteration times SlashDude 15k Search 0 2004-01-28 05:47
Slow iteration times with 23.7 smoffat Software 13 2003-10-22 22:50

All times are UTC. The time now is 23:59.


Sat Jan 28 23:59:04 UTC 2023 up 163 days, 21:27, 0 users, load averages: 1.11, 1.03, 0.99

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2023, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

This forum has received and complied with 0 (zero) government requests for information.

Permission is granted to copy, distribute and/or modify this document under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.2 or any later version published by the Free Software Foundation.
A copy of the license is included in the FAQ.

≠ ± ∓ ÷ × · − √ ‰ ⊗ ⊕ ⊖ ⊘ ⊙ ≤ ≥ ≦ ≧ ≨ ≩ ≺ ≻ ≼ ≽ ⊏ ⊐ ⊑ ⊒ ² ³ °
∠ ∟ ° ≅ ~ ‖ ⟂ ⫛
≡ ≜ ≈ ∝ ∞ ≪ ≫ ⌊⌋ ⌈⌉ ∘ ∏ ∐ ∑ ∧ ∨ ∩ ∪ ⨀ ⊕ ⊗ 𝖕 𝖖 𝖗 ⊲ ⊳
∅ ∖ ∁ ↦ ↣ ∩ ∪ ⊆ ⊂ ⊄ ⊊ ⊇ ⊃ ⊅ ⊋ ⊖ ∈ ∉ ∋ ∌ ℕ ℤ ℚ ℝ ℂ ℵ ℶ ℷ ℸ 𝓟
¬ ∨ ∧ ⊕ → ← ⇒ ⇐ ⇔ ∀ ∃ ∄ ∴ ∵ ⊤ ⊥ ⊢ ⊨ ⫤ ⊣ … ⋯ ⋮ ⋰ ⋱
∫ ∬ ∭ ∮ ∯ ∰ ∇ ∆ δ ∂ ℱ ℒ ℓ
𝛢𝛼 𝛣𝛽 𝛤𝛾 𝛥𝛿 𝛦𝜀𝜖 𝛧𝜁 𝛨𝜂 𝛩𝜃𝜗 𝛪𝜄 𝛫𝜅 𝛬𝜆 𝛭𝜇 𝛮𝜈 𝛯𝜉 𝛰𝜊 𝛱𝜋 𝛲𝜌 𝛴𝜎𝜍 𝛵𝜏 𝛶𝜐 𝛷𝜙𝜑 𝛸𝜒 𝛹𝜓 𝛺𝜔