![]() |
![]() |
#1 |
Jul 2003
616 Posts |
![]()
My CPU usage is at 100% 24/7 while prime95 is running.....i know prome uses idle CPU clocks but won't running at 100% kill my CPU over time?
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Jul 2003
100102 Posts |
![]()
I'm fairly new to GIMPS, but I've been doing other distributed computing projects for about four years now. All with overclocked CPU's running 24/7 and have had no problems whatsoever.
I think CPU's like the abuse. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 | |
Feb 2003
7810 Posts |
![]() Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
"Mark"
Feb 2003
Sydney
3·191 Posts |
![]()
Your cpu will run hotter, but as long as it's not "too hot" it should be fine. (Preventive maintenance: check for build-up of dust on fans & grills, & airflow inside the case.) With a constant load & staying on 24/7, it should stay at a more even temperature, so there should be less expansion/contraction stress. I'm no hardware expert, I just repeat what I've read, but it makes sense, especially when it agrees with the conclusion I want! :D
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 | |
Mar 2003
1016 Posts |
![]()
From the FAQ:
Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
Apr 2003
1010 Posts |
![]()
Poor Antec1, it lived long enough to test one number and then was turned into slag in a warehouse fire. The computer I won't miss but that beautiful brand new HP LaserJet 4200 ...
Oh well, out with the 1.7GHz Celeron, in with the 2.8GHz P4 |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 | |
Aug 2002
2·101 Posts |
![]() Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 |
Jun 2003
Shanghai, China
109 Posts |
![]()
I think Prime95 is more like doing a constant 110 mph on the freeway, pedal to the floor. But I agree, in principle it should not do any harm - the chip is designed for that provided it's properly cooled.
What makes me jealous is those overclockers who come flashing their headlights in your rearview mirror and then zipping past at 200 mph. ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 | |
Jan 2003
North Carolina
2×3×41 Posts |
![]() Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#10 |
Sep 2003
32 Posts |
![]()
Question for you: Are you running on a P4? If you are, and its on an Intel board, odds are its only running at about 80% of is maximum speed due to clock throttling. I too leave my computer running 24/7, checking for 10-million digit primes (5 per year, roughly). I'm using a Willamette 423 1.5GHz, which originally ran about .150 sec intervals on the stock Intel board with RDRAM. I now run the machine on an ECS M920 with DDR266 (and no automatic clock throttling), and get .135 sec intervals. The tradeoff is that the stock heatsink wasn't up to the task of running at full speed, so my computer used to hit the emergency thermal shutdown all the time. Not to mention it became a blast furnace from Hell. The solution was to improve the cooling: I added a 4-lb copper heatsink. And the 4-lb part is not a joke, it requires special mounting. But, my core runs about 42C-45C, whereas it used to run near-abouts 100C average. The thermal shutdown for a P4 is around 120C-130C. In all, as long as you keep the machine well cooled (and most P4 boards come with built-in thermal monitors, in fact the P4 has its own thermal sensor built in), it shouldn't ever fail.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#11 | |
Aug 2003
Upstate NY, USA
2×163 Posts |
![]() Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Low CPU/GPU usage? | GeoffreyY | Msieve | 23 | 2017-02-17 18:01 |
GPU Usage | Brain | GPU Computing | 9 | 2011-04-12 22:25 |
Usage of GMP-ECM | ECMFreak | Factoring | 13 | 2007-07-20 17:34 |
Any way to reduce CPU usage? | Jarl | Hardware | 5 | 2007-03-30 19:13 |
CPU usage | Unregistered | Software | 6 | 2003-11-19 07:05 |