20130921, 12:25  #89  
Just call me Henry
"David"
Sep 2007
Cambridge (GMT/BST)
2×29×101 Posts 
Quote:


20130921, 16:44  #90 
Sep 2008
Kansas
2^{2}×829 Posts 
The c162 poly is still being researched. NFS@Home will get it in a few days.

20130921, 20:05  #91  
"Ed Hall"
Dec 2009
Adirondack Mtns
3,691 Posts 
Quote:
What's a good rule for maxmem? what the OS says is available or what the total size is? 

20130921, 20:07  #92 
"Ed Hall"
Dec 2009
Adirondack Mtns
3,691 Posts 
I've moved all my ecm over to the c172, although I could move it back, if that would be any better. I suppose at this point we're looking for some good size factors for both of the numbers...

20130921, 23:48  #93 
"Curtis"
Feb 2005
Riverside, CA
11201_{8} Posts 
The 162 has had morethanoptimal ECM, no need to continue. The extra 2000 at 2e8 was polite, imo, when using external NFS resources.
The GPUers should give 57 days each (3 of us searching, so 1520 GPUdays in total) in poly search, so we should have a poly Thursday or Friday. We'd expect the C172 to take about 4x as long to NFS, so it demands roughly 4x as much ECM as the 162? Something like 15k curves at 11e7 and 2025k at 2e8/26e7? If this is a decent estimate, no wonder you say weeks to months of ECM before this one is ready. 
20130930, 00:57  #94 
"Curtis"
Feb 2005
Riverside, CA
4737_{10} Posts 
Line 1361 is now in factordb. Who picks it up next?

20130930, 01:54  #95 
"Ed Hall"
Dec 2009
Adirondack Mtns
111001101011_{2} Posts 
Thanks much! I think it's kind of a freeforall now with ECM and if anyone has any success, it's mentioned so those working on it know. Someone else can chime in if there's more to it than that...
Again, thanks! edit: i1362 is now a c125... Last fiddled with by EdH on 20130930 at 02:27 
20130930, 07:21  #96 
Romulan Interpreter
Jun 2011
Thailand
2·4,691 Posts 
I didn't do any work for 3408 (neither 4788, shame on me!) but I am watching all three sequences very close (including 3366 which was somehow "my pick"). This one is easy now, but it regained the driver, so....
I think I will not get too many boulders onto my head if I would suggest to abandon it when it gets the next, higher (say C150), gnfsable cofactor, and concentrate on 3366? 
20130930, 10:44  #97  
Just call me Henry
"David"
Sep 2007
Cambridge (GMT/BST)
13342_{8} Posts 
Quote:


20131128, 03:33  #98 
Sep 2008
Kansas
CF4_{16} Posts 
c125 @ i1368
2 * 3 * … * C125
I suppose not much interest in this sequence anymore. Should it be released? 
20131128, 04:23  #99 
Dec 2012
2·139 Posts 
I was going to do the C125 after I finished my share of the team sieve. But if the forum is no longer interested in the sequence then I won't bother.

Thread Tools  
Similar Threads  
Thread  Thread Starter  Forum  Replies  Last Post 
Reserved for MF  Sequence 3366  RichD  Aliquot Sequences  469  20210417 22:39 
Reserved for MF  Sequence 4788  schickel  Aliquot Sequences  2957  20210416 11:51 
Reserved for MF  Sequence 276  kar_bon  Aliquot Sequences  127  20201217 10:05 
Team Sieve #37: 3408:i1287  RichD  Aliquot Sequences  14  20130802 17:02 
80M to 64 bits ... but not really reserved  petrw1  Lone Mersenne Hunters  82  20100111 01:57 