20150131, 09:26  #166 
"Antonio Key"
Sep 2011
UK
3^{2}·59 Posts 

20150131, 12:14  #167  
(loop (#_fork))
Feb 2006
Cambridge, England
13·491 Posts 
Quote:
If you send a PM to yoyo he might well be willing to run the larger curves on yoyo@home, which can do 30k curves at B1=260M in about a week. 

20150131, 20:58  #168  
"Antonio Key"
Sep 2011
UK
3^{2}×59 Posts 
Quote:
t20: 80 curves at B1=11k t25: 220 curves at B1=50k t30: 430 curves at B1=250k t35: 910 curves at B1=1M t40: 2350 curves at B1=3M t45: 4480 curves at B1=11M with no factors found. Currently running t50: 7560 curves at B1= 43M (about 2.5  3 days to complete). 

20150203, 11:15  #169  
"Antonio Key"
Sep 2011
UK
3^{2}·59 Posts 
Quote:
My batch file had started t55 level when I stopped it  ran 100 curves at B1=110M with nothing found. ETA 1516 days to complete t55 so dropping at this point. 

20150503, 17:56  #170 
Oct 2006
Berlin, Germany
2^{2}·3^{2}·17 Posts 
I'll queue 18000 curves at B1=110M in yoyo@home. Once the first is completed you can see the progress here http://www.rechenkraft.net/yoyo//y_status_ecm.php.

20150503, 19:42  #171 
Apr 2013
Germany
2×5×31 Posts 
Just for the record, because I couldn't find what number you where talking about.
sequence 3408 is at i1589 with: 2 * 3^{3} * 7 * 11 * 14143346360086898455751_{<23>} * 1197411773...77_{<162>} 
20150503, 20:30  #172 
Oct 2006
Berlin, Germany
264_{16} Posts 
Yes, I run exactly this C162.

20150504, 16:00  #173 
"Curtis"
Feb 2005
Riverside, CA
4737_{10} Posts 
A t55 is overkill for a C162. If you get 10000 curves done at 110M, I'll volunteer to take on the GNFS, or at least the poly select if some bigger gun wants to do the sieving (it'll take me 34 weeks on a quadcore).

20150511, 18:23  #174 
Oct 2006
Berlin, Germany
1001100100_{2} Posts 
So far 15610 curves @ B1 = 110M done.

20150511, 18:49  #175 
"Curtis"
Feb 2005
Riverside, CA
1281_{16} Posts 

20150605, 02:43  #176 
"Curtis"
Feb 2005
Riverside, CA
3·1,579 Posts 
The matrix is running now. I ran using 14e/32 bit LP, and 240.0M relations at default target density got me an 8.7M matrix. This built on the first filtering attempt, so 240M is not the minimum number of relations for a C162 and 32 bit LP. Factors in ~3 days.
Could someone remind me what the msieve filtering command is to truncate a .dat, so I can see how small a relation set I needed to build a matrix? 
Thread Tools  
Similar Threads  
Thread  Thread Starter  Forum  Replies  Last Post 
Reserved for MF  Sequence 3366  RichD  Aliquot Sequences  469  20210417 22:39 
Reserved for MF  Sequence 4788  schickel  Aliquot Sequences  2957  20210416 11:51 
Reserved for MF  Sequence 276  kar_bon  Aliquot Sequences  127  20201217 10:05 
Team Sieve #37: 3408:i1287  RichD  Aliquot Sequences  14  20130802 17:02 
80M to 64 bits ... but not really reserved  petrw1  Lone Mersenne Hunters  82  20100111 01:57 