mersenneforum.org GPU to 72 status...
 Register FAQ Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

 2021-02-27, 21:13 #5138 Chuck     May 2011 Orange Park, FL 15668 Posts Thanks for fixing the auto-submit.
2021-02-27, 21:23   #5139
chalsall
If I May

"Chris Halsall"
Sep 2002

7×29×47 Posts

Quote:
 Originally Posted by Chuck Thanks for fixing the auto-submit.
You're welcome...

Somewhat ironically, this is an example of where "a human is still in the loop". In this case, me...

Primenet requires that each CPU exchange deep knowledge interaction at least once every week or else it won't accept any results. This includes the "Virtual Machines" tied to your GPU72_TF machine.

It's on my "to-do list" to automate that. But, unfortunately, my to-do list is rather long, and multidimensional...

 2021-02-28, 00:10 #5140 Chuck     May 2011 Orange Park, FL 37616 Posts This exponent was automatically submitted with a factor found to Primenet, but it remains in my list of notebook instance results. Code: UID: jaxbuilder/Colab, found 1 factor for M106579087 from 2^75 to 2^76 (partially tested) [mfaktc 0.21 barrett76_mul32_gs]
 2021-02-28, 03:27 #5141 Chuck     May 2011 Orange Park, FL 2×443 Posts Why do I have all these repetitive entries on the GIMPS site? I have a bunch of entries showing zero credit for factoring to 76. This is just one example; a lot of exponents look the same way. I think these were before you fixed the auto-submit problem. Code: 105455461 No factors below 276 Assigned Assigned User Work Type Stage % Done Updated Expired 2020-03-28 GPU Factoring trial factoring 0.0 % 2021-02-22 History Date User Type Result 2021-02-27 Chuck NF no factor from 2^75 to 2^76 2021-02-27 Chuck NF no factor from 2^75 to 2^76 2021-02-27 Chuck NF no factor from 2^75 to 2^76 2021-02-27 Chuck NF no factor from 2^75 to 2^76 2021-02-27 Chuck NF no factor from 2^75 to 2^76 2021-02-27 Chuck NF no factor from 2^75 to 2^76 2021-02-27 Chuck NF no factor from 2^75 to 2^76 2021-02-27 Chuck NF no factor from 2^75 to 2^76 2021-02-27 Chuck NF no factor from 2^75 to 2^76 2021-02-27 Chuck NF no factor from 2^75 to 2^76 2021-02-27 Chuck NF no factor from 2^75 to 2^76 2021-02-27 Chuck NF no factor from 2^75 to 2^76 2021-02-27 Chuck NF no factor from 2^75 to 2^76 2021-02-27 Chuck NF no factor from 2^75 to 2^76 2021-02-27 Chuck NF no factor from 2^75 to 2^76 2021-02-27 Chuck NF no factor from 2^75 to 2^76 2021-02-27 Chuck NF no factor from 2^75 to 2^76 2021-02-27 Chuck NF no factor from 2^75 to 2^76 2021-02-27 Chuck NF no factor from 2^75 to 2^76 2021-02-27 Chuck NF no factor from 2^75 to 2^76 2021-02-27 Chuck NF no factor from 2^75 to 2^76 2021-02-27 Chuck NF no factor from 2^75 to 2^76 2021-02-27 Chuck NF no factor from 2^75 to 2^76 2021-02-27 Chuck NF no factor from 2^75 to 2^76 2021-02-27 Chuck NF no factor from 2^75 to 2^76 2020-10-31 RichD0 NF no factor from 2^74 to 2^75 2020-04-02 SRBase NF no factor from 2^73 to 2^74
 2021-02-28, 03:33 #5142 Chuck     May 2011 Orange Park, FL 11011101102 Posts These seven exponents are duplicated over and over in my GIMPS work results details. Code: GPU72_TF 105455461 NF 2021-02-27 15:53 0.0 no factor from 2^75 to 2^76 0.0000 GPU72_TF 105160723 NF 2021-02-27 15:53 0.0 no factor from 2^75 to 2^76 0.0000 GPU72_TF 110890261 NF 2021-02-27 15:52 0.0 no factor from 2^75 to 2^76 0.0000 GPU72_TF 105447491 NF 2021-02-27 15:52 0.0 no factor from 2^75 to 2^76 0.0000 GPU72_TF 105776171 NF 2021-02-27 15:52 0.0 no factor from 2^75 to 2^76 0.0000 GPU72_TF 104856761 NF 2021-02-27 15:52 0.0 no factor from 2^75 to 2^76 0.0000 GPU72_TF 106225657 NF 2021-02-27 15:52 0.0 no factor from 2^75 to 2^76 0.0000
2021-02-28, 16:24   #5143
chalsall
If I May

"Chris Halsall"
Sep 2002

7×29×47 Posts

Quote:
 Originally Posted by Chuck Why do I have all these repetitive entries on the GIMPS site? I have a bunch of entries showing zero credit for factoring to 76. This is just one example; a lot of exponents look the same way. I think these were before you fixed the auto-submit problem.
Hmmm... This is something new... The GPU72 code paths have not changed at all.

Previously if the Virtual Machine hadn't checked in and a result submission was attempted Primenet would simply ignore it. Now it seems it accepts the result but still returns an error message. Rinse and repeat.

This shouldn't happen on your account again. I'll bump up the priority on the Automatic Machine Update thing.

Beyond that, George and/or Aaron, any ideas on this delta? And can you fix Chuck's duplicate results please?

 2021-03-24, 22:18 #5144 Uncwilly 6809 > 6502     """"""""""""""""""" Aug 2003 101×103 Posts 2×3×1,583 Posts Can the time between saves for the GPU72 Colab notebook be set to 5 minutes? We are loosing a lot of the work attempted. I am getting runs of 9 to 12 minutes that are not advancing the the ball.
2021-03-25, 00:27   #5145
LOBES

Mar 2019
USA

3×17 Posts

Quote:
 Originally Posted by Uncwilly Can the time between saves for the GPU72 Colab notebook be set to 5 minutes? We are loosing a lot of the work attempted. I am getting runs of 9 to 12 minutes that are not advancing the the ball.
I stopped using my Colab after my paid subscription ran out, since I was getting 10 minutes run times (on a paid account!).

Its been a few months since then, and after seeing this thread I thought maybe I'd give it a go again (this time on my free account).

Ran 6 minutes and stopped.

Oh well.

 2021-03-25, 00:41 #5146 Chuck     May 2011 Orange Park, FL 2·443 Posts I rejoined Colab paid version after a five month lapse. In the last three weeks since rejoining, I have been getting 24 hour run times, sometimes with a V100. I take a break of eight hours or so after the session stops. Last fiddled with by Chuck on 2021-03-25 at 00:44 Reason: Take break
2021-03-25, 02:01   #5147
petrw1
1976 Toyota Corona years forever!

"Wayne"
Nov 2006

2×5×461 Posts

Quote:
 Originally Posted by LOBES I stopped using my Colab after my paid subscription ran out, since I was getting 10 minutes run times (on a paid account!). Its been a few months since then, and after seeing this thread I thought maybe I'd give it a go again (this time on my free account). Ran 6 minutes and stopped. Oh well.
I don't know whats going on but when I was part of Chris cool auto colab app a year ago I was getting 2 or 3 hours. in September I decided to try to get GPUOwl running. Since then I get a P100 for each of my 2 email addresses every day that last about 8 hours each.

My guess would be Colab deems everyone part of the Chris tool are sharing his session.
I don't know how or if its possible but if somehow it could be distributed/uncoupled... then maybe times would get back to decent?

2021-03-25, 02:42   #5148
Chuck

May 2011
Orange Park, FL

2·443 Posts

Quote:
 Originally Posted by petrw1 My guess would be Colab deems everyone part of the Chris tool are sharing his session. I don't know how or if its possible but if somehow it could be distributed/uncoupled... then maybe times would get back to decent?
I'm using Chris' tool and getting 24 hour run times.

 Similar Threads Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post Primeinator Operation Billion Digits 5 2011-12-06 02:35 1997rj7 Lone Mersenne Hunters 27 2008-09-29 13:52 Uncwilly Operation Billion Digits 22 2005-10-25 14:05 paulunderwood 3*2^n-1 Search 2 2005-03-13 17:03 1997rj7 Lone Mersenne Hunters 25 2004-06-18 16:46

All times are UTC. The time now is 11:46.

Thu Apr 22 11:46:04 UTC 2021 up 14 days, 6:26, 0 users, load averages: 1.56, 1.91, 1.86