20080828, 21:14  #1 
Dec 2005
2^{2}·23 Posts 
Inconsistencies on Wikipedia?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Maxwell...tion_of_speeds
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Boltzmann_constant Wikipedia says that the Boltzman constant k, is k = R/N(a), where R is the ideal gas constant and N(a) is Avogadro's number, yet whenever this is substituted into equations on wikipedia, terms seem to vanish. For example, in the following, m, the molar mass, seems to disappear from the equation: http://upload.wikimedia.org/math/c/b...84248a223c.png In the case of the ideal gas law, n, the number of moles, also seems to disappear from the equation: http://upload.wikimedia.org/math/3/c...db3107f630.png http://upload.wikimedia.org/math/2/3...172d2a6331.png Is this some error or is there some implicit thing that I fail to see? I apologize if asking here is inappropriate, but this is the only place that I know where I can ask math/mathrelated questions and expect to receive some sort of answer, so I thought I would ask here. By the way, I had not seen that the equation for the mean speed of molecules in a gas had already been derived for me on Wikipedia, so I took it upon myself to derive it. While working on that problem, I found a problem in my old Calculus textbook that asked for a derivation of the very same thing, wondered why there was a discrepancy between the usage of R and k in the equation the textbook had (it used R) and the equation Wikipedia had (it used k) and solved the textbook problem anyway. I would not have noticed this if it had not been for that. I am very curious as to what the reason is for the discrepancies I have found. Last fiddled with by ShiningArcanine on 20080828 at 21:15 
20080828, 21:40  #2  
"Ben"
Feb 2007
110101001100_{2} Posts 
Quote:
http://www.physicsforums.com/ I can't be any more helpful at the moment, sorry. 

20080828, 22:03  #3 
Jan 2005
479 Posts 
With (1) pV=nRT (n is given in moles)
and (2) pV=NkT (n is given in number of molecules) it implies that nRT=NkT > nR=Nk > k=R*n/N Given that k=R/N_a (N_a is the number of Avogadro, # molecules per mole) this gives that N_a equals N/n I think you got disoriented by the different kinds of n's. 
20080828, 22:25  #4 
Einyen
Dec 2003
Denmark
2^{2}·769 Posts 
It seems ok to me. Remember that Molar mass: M = m * N_{A}. Insert that and k=R/N_{A} in v_{p} and the 2 equations are the same.
The last two equations implies that N*k = n*R which at first glance looks wrong. But N is not Advogadros constant it is the actual number of molecules: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ideal_gas_law So N = n*N_{A}, and if you insert above: n*N_{A}*k = n*R or k = R/N_{A} , which is the defenition of k. Edit: Ops I was too slow :) Last fiddled with by ATH on 20080828 at 22:28 
20080902, 20:41  #5 
Dec 2005
2^{2}×23 Posts 
Thankyou very much for the explanation. :)

Thread Tools  
Similar Threads  
Thread  Thread Starter  Forum  Replies  Last Post 
yoyo@home and wikipedia  Dubslow  Factoring  1  20151206 15:56 
Mersenne Wikipedia edits?  Sutton Shin  mersennewiki  0  20120929 08:10 
Wikipedia article on SNFS  fivemack  Factoring  2  20070215 17:52 
Quadratic Sieve in wikipedia.de  ThiloHarich  Factoring  5  20060714 09:51 
promoted to administrator on Wikipedia!  ixfd64  Lounge  3  20050922 05:44 