mersenneforum.org  

Go Back   mersenneforum.org > Great Internet Mersenne Prime Search > Data > Marin's Mersenne-aries

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 2021-10-07, 21:34   #133
lycorn
 
lycorn's Avatar
 
"GIMFS"
Sep 2002
Oeiras, Portugal

2×32×83 Posts
Default

Correct, but you apparently missed my point. We have a set of expiration rules, so we should abide by them, as not following the agreed rules is worse than not having rules at all. We may be driving people away from the project by doing this sort of things. That's what I classify as "detrimental", not some time occasionally wasted on a unneeded TC.
lycorn is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2021-10-17, 15:58   #134
sweety439
 
sweety439's Avatar
 
"99(4^34019)99 palind"
Nov 2016
(P^81993)SZ base 36

BF616 Posts
Default

OEIS sequence https://oeis.org/A000043 has not been updated by adding a proven term a(48) = 57885161
sweety439 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 2021-10-17, 16:44   #135
kriesel
 
kriesel's Avatar
 
"TF79LL86GIMPS96gpu17"
Mar 2017
US midwest

581310 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by sweety439 View Post
OEIS sequence https://oeis.org/A000043 has not been updated by adding a proven term a(48) = 57885161
That's been mentioned a few times in another thread, most recently https://mersenneforum.org/showpost.p...8&postcount=34
kriesel is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 2021-10-17, 16:48   #136
kriesel
 
kriesel's Avatar
 
"TF79LL86GIMPS96gpu17"
Mar 2017
US midwest

16B516 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by lycorn View Post
Correct, but you apparently missed my point. We have a set of expiration rules, so we should abide by them, as not following the agreed rules is worse than not having rules at all. We may be driving people away from the project by doing this sort of things.
Apparently you missed my point. People do not perfectly follow rules. And even if they did, due to other factors, there would be occasional unneeded tests completed or other mechanisms of cycles lost, or other points of irritation. I get your point that it may cause some to leave the project. So may a high level of enforcement or complaint about imperfect enforcement of a rule set, cause some others to leave. It's unclear where the optimum lies.

Last fiddled with by kriesel on 2021-10-17 at 16:49
kriesel is online now   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Let's finish primality verification through Mp#49*, M(74 207 281) firejuggler Marin's Mersenne-aries 75 2021-10-20 21:53
Mission Creep davieddy PrimeNet 14 2011-12-10 20:55
Doing more about LL test verification jasong Software 13 2010-03-10 18:53
Mission Accomplished garo Soap Box 13 2009-01-22 20:10
First mission GP2 Completed Missions 2 2003-09-28 23:16

All times are UTC. The time now is 23:55.


Wed Oct 27 23:55:55 UTC 2021 up 96 days, 18:24, 0 users, load averages: 0.93, 0.96, 0.98

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2021, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

This forum has received and complied with 0 (zero) government requests for information.

Permission is granted to copy, distribute and/or modify this document under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.2 or any later version published by the Free Software Foundation.
A copy of the license is included in the FAQ.