|
2005-11-29, 00:08
|
#12 |
Jun 2003
7·233 Posts |
According to intel a P-M 1.6 ghz is equal to a P4 2.4ghz in performance. So it seems your P-M is bad for PRPing.
I guess then you should stick to sieving. May be Prime95 (George) can answer this question for us. Citrix |
|
|
|
2005-11-29, 00:50
|
#13 |
Feb 2003
Istanbul
22×13 Posts |
I have a P-M laptop and a P4 2.66 laptop. P-M 1.6 has a much better overall performance than P4 2.66 on a laptop. But not a good performance on PRP.
P4 2.66 laptop is not good on a daily basis because of its temperature (real hot) and I cannot stand its fan sound. And also it shuts down because of heat when I run PRP on it. So I'm waiting for the end of the warranty period to replace its P4 2.66 with a little celeron. Anyway do you have any news about chuck's supersiever. If it becomes real I'll have to find some place for my PIII boxes and a way to run 4 or 5 boxes with just one monitor. Any ideas? drakkar |
|
|
|
|
2005-11-29, 01:05
|
#14 |
|
Jun 2003
7×233 Posts |
What is chuck's supersiever?
Citrix |
|
|
|
|
2005-11-29, 06:25
|
#15 |
|
Feb 2003
Istanbul
22×13 Posts |
sorry it must be chcuk's supersiever
|
|
|
|
 |
| Thread Tools | |
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| GPU LLR program | jasong | GPU Computing | 19 | 2011-08-23 03:32 |
| So you think you can program | rogue | Lounge | 5 | 2009-10-02 15:02 |
| Program | Primeinator | Information & Answers | 5 | 2009-07-16 21:42 |
| Program for GPU | tribal | Information & Answers | 5 | 2009-03-19 20:54 |
| Old Program | moo | Software | 0 | 2006-06-27 00:19 |
