mersenneforum.org  

Go Back   mersenneforum.org > Other Stuff > Archived Projects > Prime Cullen Prime

 
 
Thread Tools
Old 2007-07-09, 17:00   #12
SB2
 
SB2's Avatar
 
Jul 2003

2×3×19 Posts
Default

I noticed they have started sending out Woodall candidates again, so I guess everything has worked out for all involved?
SB2 is offline  
Old 2007-07-09, 20:03   #13
hhh
 
hhh's Avatar
 
Jun 2005

373 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by rogue View Post
I have been working with the folks at PrimeGrid so all issues will be worked out shortly. AFAIK, they have not "poached" work from anybody as they contacted other searchers on their own.
Good to hear.

Quote:
Originally Posted by SB2 View Post
I noticed they have started sending out Woodall candidates again, so I guess everything has worked out for all involved?
As far as I understood, Woodal is working, and Cullen has some minor Client issues yet to solve.

Does anybody take offence if I give them the numbers from 2.5M-3M as a test? So we could see how quick they are, and later how fast they do with Cullen.

I will provide some new sieving soon, as well.

Yours H.
hhh is offline  
Old 2007-07-09, 22:52   #14
SB2
 
SB2's Avatar
 
Jul 2003

2×3×19 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by hhh View Post
Good to hear.



As far as I understood, Woodal is working, and Cullen has some minor Client issues yet to solve.

Does anybody take offence if I give them the numbers from 2.5M-3M as a test? So we could see how quick they are, and later how fast they do with Cullen.

I will provide some new sieving soon, as well.

Yours H.
How many candidates are there from the area we are LLR testing to 2.5M? Enough to keep us busy LLR'ing while sieving a higher range?

It is your project, but if we wish to continue the project as envisioned, I fail to see the reasoning behind giving them the smaller/faster candidates when it is obvious they have far more resources available, therefore more capable to do the higher ranges. After all thier plan is to test upto 10M.
SB2 is offline  
Old 2007-07-11, 09:22   #15
hhh
 
hhh's Avatar
 
Jun 2005

17516 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by SB2 View Post
How many candidates are there from the area we are LLR testing to 2.5M? Enough to keep us busy LLR'ing while sieving a higher range?

It is your project, but if we wish to continue the project as envisioned, I fail to see the reasoning behind giving them the smaller/faster candidates when it is obvious they have far more resources available, therefore more capable to do the higher ranges. After all thier plan is to test upto 10M.
Actually it is your project, or at least ours.

We had about 3800 candidates in the 1.5M-5M-range, uniformly distributed. the 5M-tests are estimated to take about one day each.

From your response, I guess it is the best to stick to geoffs proposal, which is wait and see how things develop, while of course helping PG with factors and so on.

Meanwhile, I think we are ready for the near future: Sieving is online again, I have fully P-1ed LLR candidates up to 3M (need only to post them), and P-1 work is still available as well.

Cheers, Yours H.
hhh is offline  
Old 2007-09-07, 03:24   #16
geoff
 
geoff's Avatar
 
Mar 2003
New Zealand

13×89 Posts
Default

Primegrid is catching up. PCP LLR has almost reached n=3,000,000, but at this rate Primegrid will probably overtake well before n=4,000,000.

I would like to keep LLR testing up to n=3,000,000, but I don't think I'll continue beyond that.

Last fiddled with by geoff on 2007-09-07 at 03:25
geoff is offline  
Old 2007-09-07, 23:49   #17
hhh
 
hhh's Avatar
 
Jun 2005

373 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by geoff View Post
Primegrid is catching up. PCP LLR has almost reached n=3,000,000, but at this rate Primegrid will probably overtake well before n=4,000,000.

I would like to keep LLR testing up to n=3,000,000, but I don't think I'll continue beyond that.
It is indeed, see this page

http://www.primegrid.com/range_grid.php

and that's why I suggest leaving PrimeCullenPrime just die in silence and dignity.

In fact there isn't even a point in continuing LLR, as they already run the doublecheck immediately.

If anybody sees a future to this project, he may speak, or remain silent forever. Or speak later, indeed. H.
hhh is offline  
Old 2007-09-08, 00:10   #18
Citrix
 
Citrix's Avatar
 
Jun 2003

162210 Posts
Default

How far is primegrid going to PRP? Are they only going to go to 3M? How far have they sieved their ranges? What program do they use to sieve?
Citrix is online now  
Old 2007-09-08, 00:43   #19
jasong
 
jasong's Avatar
 
"Jason Goatcher"
Mar 2005

3×7×167 Posts
Default

On that note, I'll unreserve the ranges I promised I'd continue doing.(I was a lying bastard even before I saw this thread :( )

It would be nice if PrimeGrid would give people the power to specifically test prime Cullen ns, or whatever they're called.

/me goes to the proper thread to unreserve his ranges.
jasong is offline  
Old 2007-09-08, 02:41   #20
BlisteringSheep
 
BlisteringSheep's Avatar
 
Oct 2006
On a Suzuki Boulevard C90

2×3×41 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by jasong View Post
It would be nice if PrimeGrid would give people the power to specifically test prime Cullen ns, or whatever they're called.
If I understand what you're asking for, it's already provided (and has been since they added Woodall & Cullen). On the PrimeGrid preferences page, you can chose to which type(s) of work you want, from Primegen, Twin Prime Search, Woodall Prime Search and Cullen Prime Search. You can do this globally or by BOINC venue (global, home, school, work).

And prior to that, you could pick TPS instead of Primegen by enabling beta applications.


Last fiddled with by BlisteringSheep on 2007-09-08 at 02:44 Reason: added older pref
BlisteringSheep is offline  
Old 2007-09-08, 20:17   #21
Citrix
 
Citrix's Avatar
 
Jun 2003

2·811 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by jasong View Post

It would be nice if PrimeGrid would give people the power to specifically test prime Cullen ns, or whatever they're called.
Perhaps we can set our own BOINC projects (So all non-GIMPS but mersenne forum projects) can get some BOINC users and speed up things. This way it might be possible for us to stay ahead of them. Does anyone know how to set up a BOINC project?
Citrix is online now  
Old 2007-09-10, 14:29   #22
hhh
 
hhh's Avatar
 
Jun 2005

373 Posts
Default

As far as I'm concerned, I neither have the power, the ressources nor the knowledge for doing so.

And I think, as a general guideline, it is better to leave to the king what belongs to the king: Primegrid's runner Rytis was the one who made PerlBoinc, as far as I know. For him, it would be like a fingersnip to implement a special choice for prime n. Well, I guess it would. So, I think our time is better spent convincing him to do so. On the other hand, there are for sure arguments against doing so, too, that I don't know.

I think pretty much that PrimeCullenPrime is done, and I'm glad that somebody else is searching for the same thing and more faster than we did.

Yours H.
hhh is offline  
 

Thread Tools


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Collaboration Requests robert44444uk Prime Gap Searches 2 2017-01-17 07:57
Collaboration with Primegrid or independent BOINC project KEP PrimeNet 18 2014-02-23 13:35
The Primegrid monopoly The Carnivore Riesel Prime Search 9 2011-04-24 20:55
ROLP at PrimeGrid mdettweiler Raiders of the Lost Primes 2 2010-09-17 05:57
Anyone knows about primegrid koders333 Factoring 8 2006-03-14 03:23

All times are UTC. The time now is 11:43.


Fri Jun 9 11:43:01 UTC 2023 up 295 days, 9:11, 0 users, load averages: 0.46, 0.80, 0.83

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2023, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

This forum has received and complied with 0 (zero) government requests for information.

Permission is granted to copy, distribute and/or modify this document under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.2 or any later version published by the Free Software Foundation.
A copy of the license is included in the FAQ.

≠ ± ∓ ÷ × · − √ ‰ ⊗ ⊕ ⊖ ⊘ ⊙ ≤ ≥ ≦ ≧ ≨ ≩ ≺ ≻ ≼ ≽ ⊏ ⊐ ⊑ ⊒ ² ³ °
∠ ∟ ° ≅ ~ ‖ ⟂ ⫛
≡ ≜ ≈ ∝ ∞ ≪ ≫ ⌊⌋ ⌈⌉ ∘ ∏ ∐ ∑ ∧ ∨ ∩ ∪ ⨀ ⊕ ⊗ 𝖕 𝖖 𝖗 ⊲ ⊳
∅ ∖ ∁ ↦ ↣ ∩ ∪ ⊆ ⊂ ⊄ ⊊ ⊇ ⊃ ⊅ ⊋ ⊖ ∈ ∉ ∋ ∌ ℕ ℤ ℚ ℝ ℂ ℵ ℶ ℷ ℸ 𝓟
¬ ∨ ∧ ⊕ → ← ⇒ ⇐ ⇔ ∀ ∃ ∄ ∴ ∵ ⊤ ⊥ ⊢ ⊨ ⫤ ⊣ … ⋯ ⋮ ⋰ ⋱
∫ ∬ ∭ ∮ ∯ ∰ ∇ ∆ δ ∂ ℱ ℒ ℓ
𝛢𝛼 𝛣𝛽 𝛤𝛾 𝛥𝛿 𝛦𝜀𝜖 𝛧𝜁 𝛨𝜂 𝛩𝜃𝜗 𝛪𝜄 𝛫𝜅 𝛬𝜆 𝛭𝜇 𝛮𝜈 𝛯𝜉 𝛰𝜊 𝛱𝜋 𝛲𝜌 𝛴𝜎𝜍 𝛵𝜏 𝛶𝜐 𝛷𝜙𝜑 𝛸𝜒 𝛹𝜓 𝛺𝜔