20170330, 08:30  #1871 
(loop (#_fork))
Feb 2006
Cambridge, England
18E8_{16} Posts 
Taking C178_187039475551_19

20170330, 09:12  #1872 
May 2009
Russia, Moscow
2×5×251 Posts 
Reserving C186_290770486991_19.

20170330, 16:49  #1873 
Feb 2012
Paris, France
2·79 Posts 
Thanks. I was expecting a smaller matrix though; I thought I would be able to
build a matrix with a much higher target density given the 460M+ relations for a 32bit job but even 132 failed, I had to lower it to 128. Last fiddled with by YuL on 20170330 at 16:49 Reason: Cosmetics 
20170402, 04:31  #1874 
"Curtis"
Feb 2005
Riverside, CA
2×3×751 Posts 
I'll take 127^95 + 95^127 cofactor from the 14e queue.
Last fiddled with by VBCurtis on 20170402 at 04:31 
20170403, 12:49  #1875 
(loop (#_fork))
Feb 2006
Cambridge, England
2^{3}×797 Posts 
C178_187039475551_19 done
Code:
Sat Apr 1 11:45:02 2017 p86 factor: 59969606437825471092748609807267089171442385775453880240834192297102407276550682363249 Sat Apr 1 11:45:02 2017 p92 factor: 28161118831265144175724429817967381635120122727242283196157680376868720112151713622855853951 Log at https://pastebin.com/iaTHLyUC or attached 
20170403, 12:51  #1876 
(loop (#_fork))
Feb 2006
Cambridge, England
2^{3}×797 Posts 
Taking C203_125_96 (ETA Monday morning, since the linear algebra should finish just after goinghome time on Friday)
Last fiddled with by fivemack on 20170404 at 12:45 
20170404, 12:46  #1877 
(loop (#_fork))
Feb 2006
Cambridge, England
18E8_{16} Posts 
Taking C202_134_87 (15e)
22.8M density120 matrix, ETA sometime in the week after Easter Last fiddled with by fivemack on 20170407 at 17:07 
20170404, 17:29  #1878 
"Rich"
Aug 2002
Benicia, California
1,171 Posts 
Reserving C237_12161_59 (14e)

20170406, 17:07  #1879 
"Curtis"
Feb 2005
Riverside, CA
4506_{10} Posts 
I forgot to add target_density to the command line, and produced a 21.8M matrix at default density. I reran the filtering with TD = 140, and produced the identical matrix!
I realized that meant the dataset was oversieved, so I reduced to 470M relations (from initial 495M) and ran again. This produced a 20.4M matrix at density around 100; reducing to 450M rels produced 19.7M matrix at density 125. This matrix is forecast to take 80100 hr longer than the original matrix, so I'm solving a 21.8M matrix at density 67, forecast to take 25 days or so. Matrixbuilding took 8005MB, while the solving step is logged at 6500MB while top claims 7.6g used. 
20170406, 22:59  #1880 
(loop (#_fork))
Feb 2006
Cambridge, England
6376_{10} Posts 

20170407, 16:00  #1881 
(loop (#_fork))
Feb 2006
Cambridge, England
2^{3}×797 Posts 
C203_125_96 done
Code:
Fri Apr 7 10:30:05 2017 p60 factor: 262140789711545872971063685147422871988451144802929070574027 Fri Apr 7 10:30:05 2017 p71 factor: 56035791901525658273230054058046999996742343570248151591987937037637071 Fri Apr 7 10:30:05 2017 p73 factor: 1202663914264836729954659180323840975151179663082897780688670921683426083 Log attached and at https://pastebin.com/1tVttxqP 
Thread Tools  
Similar Threads  
Thread  Thread Starter  Forum  Replies  Last Post 
restarting nfs linear algebra  cubaq  YAFU  2  20170402 11:35 
Linear algebra at 600%  CRGreathouse  Msieve  8  20090805 07:25 
Linear algebra crashes  10metreh  Msieve  3  20090202 08:34 
Linear algebra proof  Damian  Math  8  20070212 22:25 
Linear algebra in MPQS  R1zZ1  Factoring  2  20070202 06:45 