processed dc and tc posts - Page 82

sdbardwick · 2022-11-26, 05:21

Also took these:
Cat 2
DoubleCheck=64991467,75,1

Exponents with 1 Suspect result + 1 Unverified result:

Cat 2
DoubleCheck=65176789,75,1
DoubleCheck=65238737,75,1

Uncwilly · 2022-11-27, 18:31

Lists updated. Please note that for the TC's, especial for those with a "Suspect" result, please do LL to confirm that the machine/result is bad or good.

Runtime Error · 2022-11-27, 19:41

I'm not DCing these, but I am redoing the P1 with big B2. Will be done today. (I hope that's ok

)

Quote:

DoubleCheck=64781627,75,1
DoubleCheck=64984289,75,1
DoubleCheck=65042753,75,1
DoubleCheck=65047649,75,1

Runtime Error · 2022-11-28, 02:20

Done with those above. Got one!

M65047649 has a 77.733-bit (24-digit) factor: 251097292566615314617607 (P-1,B1=1090000,B2=1057582890)

Not too big, but the factorization of K is:

2 × 653 × 3 463 × 65 047 649 × 853 522 073

which makes it the biggest B2 I've found from P-1 thus far!

Uncwilly · 2022-12-01, 21:13

List updated

Uncwilly · 2022-12-02, 21:44

List updated. I took the 1 PRP + 1 LL. But, since it is in the FTC Cat 0 range, PrimeNet won't let me register it. I am doing it as a PRP with proof file.

Jan S · 2022-12-03, 06:45

I took all Cat 3 exponents. I noticed, that suspect results needed LL-test. I do it.

Naegi Makoto · 2022-12-03, 08:22

Took
DoubleCheck=65184283,75,1
DoubleCheck=65238949,75,1
DoubleCheck=65283367,75,1
DoubleCheck=65286251,75,1

ric · 2022-12-03, 12:27

Requesting another TC (again, LL only, please) for this one:

Code:

DoubleCheck=65457529,76,1

TIA

kriesel · 2022-12-03, 13:39

Quote:

Originally Posted by ric

Code:

DoubleCheck=65457529,76,1

ETA ~3 d.

sdbardwick · 2022-12-04, 18:49

All exponents appear to be assigned

2022-11-27, 18:31	#893
Uncwilly 6809 > 6502 """"""""""""""""""" Aug 2003 101×103 Posts 10891₁₀ Posts	Lists updated. Please note that for the TC's, especial for those with a "Suspect" result, please do LL to confirm that the machine/result is bad or good. Last fiddled with by Uncwilly on 2022-11-27 at 19:04

2022-12-03, 12:27	#900
ric Jul 2004 Milan, Ita 11110011₂ Posts	Requesting another TC (again, LL only, please) for this one: Code: DoubleCheck=65457529,76,1 TIA

Similar Threads
Thread	Thread Starter	Forum	Replies	Last Post
Posts that seem less than useless, or something like that	jasong	Forum Feedback	1054	2022-06-20 22:34
Posts in limbo	10metreh	Forum Feedback	6	2013-01-10 09:50
Ton of spam posts	jasonp	Forum Feedback	9	2009-07-19 17:35
Exponents assigned to me but not processed yet?	edorajh	Data	10	2003-11-18 11:26
2000 posts!	Xyzzy	Lounge	10	2002-11-21 00:04

2022-11-26, 05:21	#892
sdbardwick Aug 2002 North San Diego County 2²·3·67 Posts	Also took these: Cat 2 DoubleCheck=64991467,75,1 Exponents with 1 Suspect result + 1 Unverified result: Cat 2 DoubleCheck=65176789,75,1 DoubleCheck=65238737,75,1

2022-11-28, 02:20	#895
Runtime Error Sep 2017 USA 2×5×19 Posts	Done with those above. Got one! M65047649 has a 77.733-bit (24-digit) factor: 251097292566615314617607 (P-1,B1=1090000,B2=1057582890) Not too big, but the factorization of K is: 2 × 653 × 3 463 × 65 047 649 × 853 522 073 which makes it the biggest B2 I've found from P-1 thus far!

2022-12-01, 21:13	#896
Uncwilly 6809 > 6502 """"""""""""""""""" Aug 2003 101×103 Posts 10891₁₀ Posts	List updated

2022-12-02, 21:44	#897
Uncwilly 6809 > 6502 """"""""""""""""""" Aug 2003 101×103 Posts 2A8B₁₆ Posts	List updated. I took the 1 PRP + 1 LL. But, since it is in the FTC Cat 0 range, PrimeNet won't let me register it. I am doing it as a PRP with proof file.

2022-12-03, 06:45	#898
Jan S Oct 2018 Slovakia 81₁₆ Posts	I took all Cat 3 exponents. I noticed, that suspect results needed LL-test. I do it.

2022-12-03, 08:22	#899
Naegi Makoto Aug 2022 3×5 Posts	Took DoubleCheck=65184283,75,1 DoubleCheck=65238949,75,1 DoubleCheck=65283367,75,1 DoubleCheck=65286251,75,1

2022-12-04, 18:49	#902
sdbardwick Aug 2002 North San Diego County 2²·3·67 Posts	All exponents appear to be assigned