20211129, 13:21  #430  
Feb 2017
Nowhere
2×2,687 Posts 
Quote:
Think  just think! how far the work of GIMPS would have been advanced by now! N.B. Please don't bother us with them post facto. Last fiddled with by Dr Sardonicus on 20211129 at 13:22 Reason: w 

20211204, 07:33  #432  
"Tucker Kao"
Jan 2020
Head Base M168202123
2^{5}×3×7 Posts 
Quote:
M168280223, M168281023, M168283823, M168285823, M168288023 None of those exponents have revealed any factors so far. I don't think any addition TF efforts will be needed after 2^78 because M168286523 seemed to be factor resistant too. I'm working on the PRP test of M168828523, very certain this one doesn't have any low hanging fruits below 2^144 either. One of my neighbor friends, a 17 years old boy who has a top end gaming computer suggested me during the Thanksgiving holiday to go after an exponent within the subrange which I've worked on with the least efforts(M168.8M). I originally planned to go after M168285823, then he had the idea to flip the 2858 to 8285. I've been working on M168.8M since 11/25/2021, the total efforts already exceeded M168.5M as of now  https://www.mersenne.ca/status/tf/0/20210201/4/16800 records on 12/03/2021 https://www.mersenne.ca/status/tf/20...210201/4/16800 records on 11/24/2021 Last fiddled with by tuckerkao on 20211204 at 08:13 

20211207, 12:49  #433 
"Tucker Kao"
Jan 2020
Head Base M168202123
672_{10} Posts 
Very interesting, SRBase reserved the exponents only up to M168313421  https://www.mersenne.org/report_expo...8314000&full=1

20211208, 03:55  #434  
"Tucker Kao"
Jan 2020
Head Base M168202123
2^{5}·3·7 Posts 
Quote:


20211209, 03:07  #435  
"Tucker Kao"
Jan 2020
Head Base M168202123
2^{5}×3×7 Posts 
Quote:
Although I've worked 1 bit lower than the recommended GPU72 TF, because of my P1, the combined estimation is still in the positive zone  https://www.mersenne.ca/exponent/168828523 Does everyone see the screenshot below when he/she visits mersenne.ca or just me? Last fiddled with by tuckerkao on 20211209 at 04:06 

20211209, 04:30  #436  
"Tucker Kao"
Jan 2020
Head Base M168202123
2^{5}×3×7 Posts 
I'm glad I've caught the screenshots and posted them here in time. Why is GPU72 trying to recommend the higher bits while I'm running the PRP(see the screenshot on the post above)?
I think the GPU72 recommendation is playing the tricks with me. Just checked another exponent which I didn't have the active PRP running and it's only recommended up to 2^{78}. See screenshot below for M168828823 Quote:
Last fiddled with by tuckerkao on 20211209 at 04:48 

20211213, 23:05  #437 
"Tucker Kao"
Jan 2020
Head Base M168202123
2^{5}×3×7 Posts 
Not an easy search, but I found it. M168654751 had been previously worked on by Team_Inspector. SRBase is finally mass trial factoring most of the M168M exponents from 2^73 to 2^74 and none of them are or will be M168,***,*23.

20211214, 09:00  #438 
"Tucker Kao"
Jan 2020
Head Base M168202123
2A0_{16} Posts 
I certainly think it'll be a good idea to have ViliamF running TFs from 2^76 to 2^78 for the last 10 remaining M106M exponents  https://www.mersenne.org/assignments...chk=1&excert=1
M106314457 and M106316611 don't have the P1 done. Last fiddled with by tuckerkao on 20211214 at 09:04 
20211214, 21:19  #439  
"Viliam Furík"
Jul 2018
Martin, Slovakia
1011101010_{2} Posts 
Quote:


20211214, 21:27  #440 
6809 > 6502
"""""""""""""""""""
Aug 2003
101×103 Posts
2813_{16} Posts 
This thing of trying to get others to do specific work (without lifting a finger) is getting old.

Thread Tools  
Similar Threads  
Thread  Thread Starter  Forum  Replies  Last Post 
Automatic fetch of Trial Factoring work for GPU mfakt*  LaurV  GPU to 72  81  20201202 05:17 
Simple Script to get Trial Factoring Work  jfamestad  PrimeNet  3  20161106 20:32 
Why trial factoring work chopped into chunks?  lidocorc  PrimeNet  4  20081106 18:48 
How does the trial factoring work with 15K*2^n1  jocelynl  15k Search  0  20030711 14:23 
How does trialfactoring work?  ThomRuley  Software  5  20030530 20:34 