20100913, 06:37  #23 
Aug 2005
Seattle, WA
686_{16} Posts 
Well yes, but not very many of them. I think 128 is too small an exponent to have any remaining composites in the Homogeneous Cunningham tables, so it's only 256 that might be an issue, given the current table limits (except for 3^512+2^512, which happens to be fully factored). And even that's too big an exponent for quite a few of the tables. So there are really only a handful of composites that would currently intersect with work being done on numbers of the form a^2^n + b^2^n (apparently 6, including the C149 from 8^256+5^256).

20100913, 23:50  #24 
Mar 2003
New Zealand
13×89 Posts 
I have checked the overlap between the Homogeneous Cunningham and Generalized Fermat tables, it turns out there were 11 factors found independently by both projects, 2 in the Homogeneous Cunningham tables but not in the Generalized Fermat tables (6^2^8+5^2^8, 8^2^8+5^2^8, reported to Wilfrid keller), and 1 in the Generalized Fermat tables but not in the Homogeneous Cunningham tables (9^2^8+7^2^8, reported to Paul Leyland).

Thread Tools  
Similar Threads  
Thread  Thread Starter  Forum  Replies  Last Post 
A note on small factors of Fermat numbers  Dr Sardonicus  Number Theory Discussion Group  1  20170717 11:55 
Script for Recognised Generalised Fermat sequence A^2+1  pepi37  Linux  0  20160229 11:57 
Use Msieve NFS for small numbers?  skan  Msieve  8  20130226 20:35 
P1 on small numbers  Unregistered  Information & Answers  2  20110822 22:53 
LLT numbers, linkd with Mersenne and Fermat numbers  T.Rex  Math  4  20050507 08:25 