20150113, 21:21  #78  
May 2008
Wilmington, DE
2^{2}×23×31 Posts 
Quote:
Last fiddled with by MyDogBuster on 20150113 at 21:22 

20150113, 21:24  #79 
I moo ablest echo power!
May 2013
2^{2}×11×41 Posts 
Thanks.

20150114, 16:51  #80 
May 2007
Kansas; USA
10110001001000_{2} Posts 

20150114, 17:03  #81 
I moo ablest echo power!
May 2013
3414_{8} Posts 
When I downloaded the sieve file, I realized that all the bases were mixed in, so I'm just sieving all of them. Sorry about that.

20150114, 17:45  #82 
"Serge"
Mar 2008
Phi(4,2^7658614+1)/2
3×3,313 Posts 

20150114, 17:53  #83 
I moo ablest echo power!
May 2013
1804_{10} Posts 
::::
Yes, the k values. I think I need more caffeine. 
20150227, 06:45  #84 
May 2007
Kansas; USA
26110_{8} Posts 
I have added to the recommended lists the following:
1. All bases that are currently at n=10K with < 300 k's remaining. 2. The two lowest "relative difficulty" bases for n=100K200K as shown on our unproven conjectures list. These both have 3 k's remaining and have fully sieved files. One more suggestion not on the list: Some new Sierp bases with conjectures k<100K to n=10K. The Sierp bases are well behind the Riesel bases as to how many bases have been started. See the two untested bases threads for the big difference between the number of untested bases with conjectures k<100K. I am continuing with the sieve of our Sierp base 6 file for P=220T250T. ETA is about 3 weeks. Last fiddled with by gd_barnes on 20150227 at 06:55 
20150328, 08:04  #85 
May 2007
Kansas; USA
2^{3}·13·109 Posts 
I am in the process of concurrently testing (on a single older 2.6 Ghz quadcore) all untested conjectures with CK<40000 to n=2500; 22 bases total; 3 Riesel and 19 Sierp bases. It should be done in 46 days. The two bases with the fewest number of k's remaining are complete. I have recommended them and the k's remaining are attached to the first post. With < 140 k's remaining at n=2500 S820 and S931 should not take too many resources to test to n=25K. As I finish the bases I will continue to add them as recommended with their k's remaining added to the attached folder.
I have a single reason for doing this at this point: The Riesel new bases have been tested quite a bit more than the Sierp bases, which has been an ongoing theme on the project almost from the time that it started. Note that I am not removing these from the "untested Riesel and Sierp bases" threads until they are actually reserved for further testing. 
20150707, 11:20  #87 
Jul 2003
1001100110_{2} Posts 
R465
i have a question
please can somebody tell me what the full range of k´s for R465 is? k=1 to ? 
20150707, 13:13  #88 
Jun 2009
2×349 Posts 

Thread Tools  
Similar Threads  
Thread  Thread Starter  Forum  Replies  Last Post 
Cunningham ECM efforts  pinhodecarlos  Cunningham Tables  30  20220830 14:01 
Doublecheck efforts; S66/S79 to start with  gd_barnes  Conjectures 'R Us  16  20140807 02:11 
ECM efforts mistake?  10metreh  mersennewiki  1  20081228 13:31 
Recommended TF bit levels for M(>10^8)  NBtarheel_33  Math  19  20081103 17:19 
ECM Efforts  R.D. Silverman  Factoring  63  20050624 13:41 