mersenneforum.org  

Go Back   mersenneforum.org > Factoring Projects > Lone Mersenne Hunters > LMH > 100M

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 2016-06-21, 16:49   #639
aurashift
 
Jan 2015

11×23 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by airsquirrels View Post

That Xeon has a result due in 13 hours :) Those new GPUs are starting to look tempting though....
I thought I read something indicating that Intel is thinking about increasing the core count substantially....hopefully for my sake...
aurashift is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2016-11-06, 15:07   #640
Lorenzo
 
Lorenzo's Avatar
 
Aug 2010
Republic of Belarus

2·89 Posts
Default

Hello!
Why this result is suspected?

Seems that this result doesn't has any error code.

Last fiddled with by Lorenzo on 2016-11-06 at 15:11
Lorenzo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2016-11-06, 15:24   #641
James Heinrich
 
James Heinrich's Avatar
 
"James Heinrich"
May 2004
ex-Northern Ontario

2×37×53 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Lorenzo View Post
Seems that this result doesn't has any error code.
Perhaps not displayed, but it does have an error code of 00000E00 (I don't recall offhand what the error field flags signify specifically)
James Heinrich is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2017-02-07, 18:39   #642
aurashift
 
Jan 2015

11·23 Posts
Default

I've got ~35 100M digits coming in in 20 days, just a heads up if anyone wants to do some TFing or release some stale exponents... These particular sockets will crank out an LL test in 45 days

Last fiddled with by aurashift on 2017-02-07 at 18:40
aurashift is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2017-02-07, 20:16   #643
Lorenzo
 
Lorenzo's Avatar
 
Aug 2010
Republic of Belarus

101100102 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by aurashift View Post
I've got ~35 100M digits coming in in 20 days, just a heads up if anyone wants to do some TFing or release some stale exponents... These particular sockets will crank out an LL test in 45 days
I have a list stale exp as you said with completed TF job! Please check your PM.
Lorenzo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2017-02-07, 20:49   #644
airsquirrels
 
airsquirrels's Avatar
 
"David"
Jul 2015
Ohio

11×47 Posts
Default

Should have ~9 100M digit LL results turning in over the next 5 days.
airsquirrels is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2017-02-22, 16:15   #645
aurashift
 
Jan 2015

3758 Posts
Default

Here they come.... Lorenzo, you should give those pre-TFd to AirSquirrels, I'm in training and wont have time to add them.
aurashift is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2017-11-27, 18:49   #646
aurashift
 
Jan 2015

11·23 Posts
Default

haven't had much hardware running mprime lately ...til now. splitting most of the sockets up between LL-WR and LL-100M. Should start seeing some movement within 30 days.
aurashift is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2017-11-27, 19:08   #647
GP2
 
GP2's Avatar
 
Sep 2003

258710 Posts
Default

If you want to do the new Gerbicz PRP tests rather than LL testing, you can:

Upgrade to version 29.4 build 5 (don't use older versions!)

and then set:

WorkPreference=154

in the prime.txt file

for 100-million digit PRP tests.


or WorkPreference=150 for first-time PRP tests, or WorkPreference=152 for world-record PRP tests.


It's a better idea to use PRP rather than LL for these very large numbers, because of the superior error checking and recovery.
GP2 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2017-11-27, 23:24   #648
aurashift
 
Jan 2015

11×23 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by GP2 View Post
If you want to do the new Gerbicz PRP tests rather than LL testing, you can:

Upgrade to version 29.4 build 5 (don't use older versions!)

and then set:

WorkPreference=154

in the prime.txt file

for 100-million digit PRP tests.


or WorkPreference=150 for first-time PRP tests, or WorkPreference=152 for world-record PRP tests.


It's a better idea to use PRP rather than LL for these very large numbers, because of the superior error checking and recovery.
ill give it a shot when i get the next batch up and going.
aurashift is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2018-05-30, 20:05   #649
WGJC3107
 
WGJC3107's Avatar
 
"Will Conway"
May 2018
UK

2×5×7 Posts
Default When I do some 100M testing in this range, should I do TF or do P-1?

I don't know which I should do, but my thought process is: TF would be quicker but would require me to download a new program, whereas P-1 would be easier to do but stage 2 would really strain my cores. Which should I do?
WGJC3107 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
GPU72 / MISFIT use for 100M digit range? Uncwilly GPU to 72 64 2013-03-31 02:45
I want a 100M digit Mersenne that.... JuanTutors PrimeNet 8 2012-12-06 13:47
How far along are you in your 100M digit LL test? JuanTutors Lounge 6 2012-02-21 07:36
100M-digit n/k pairs __HRB__ Riesel Prime Search 0 2010-05-22 01:17
100M digit prime Unregistered Information & Answers 10 2010-03-24 20:16

All times are UTC. The time now is 22:59.


Thu Dec 1 22:59:07 UTC 2022 up 105 days, 20:27, 1 user, load averages: 1.75, 1.37, 1.31

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2022, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

This forum has received and complied with 0 (zero) government requests for information.

Permission is granted to copy, distribute and/or modify this document under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.2 or any later version published by the Free Software Foundation.
A copy of the license is included in the FAQ.

≠ ± ∓ ÷ × · − √ ‰ ⊗ ⊕ ⊖ ⊘ ⊙ ≤ ≥ ≦ ≧ ≨ ≩ ≺ ≻ ≼ ≽ ⊏ ⊐ ⊑ ⊒ ² ³ °
∠ ∟ ° ≅ ~ ‖ ⟂ ⫛
≡ ≜ ≈ ∝ ∞ ≪ ≫ ⌊⌋ ⌈⌉ ∘ ∏ ∐ ∑ ∧ ∨ ∩ ∪ ⨀ ⊕ ⊗ 𝖕 𝖖 𝖗 ⊲ ⊳
∅ ∖ ∁ ↦ ↣ ∩ ∪ ⊆ ⊂ ⊄ ⊊ ⊇ ⊃ ⊅ ⊋ ⊖ ∈ ∉ ∋ ∌ ℕ ℤ ℚ ℝ ℂ ℵ ℶ ℷ ℸ 𝓟
¬ ∨ ∧ ⊕ → ← ⇒ ⇐ ⇔ ∀ ∃ ∄ ∴ ∵ ⊤ ⊥ ⊢ ⊨ ⫤ ⊣ … ⋯ ⋮ ⋰ ⋱
∫ ∬ ∭ ∮ ∯ ∰ ∇ ∆ δ ∂ ℱ ℒ ℓ
𝛢𝛼 𝛣𝛽 𝛤𝛾 𝛥𝛿 𝛦𝜀𝜖 𝛧𝜁 𝛨𝜂 𝛩𝜃𝜗 𝛪𝜄 𝛫𝜅 𝛬𝜆 𝛭𝜇 𝛮𝜈 𝛯𝜉 𝛰𝜊 𝛱𝜋 𝛲𝜌 𝛴𝜎𝜍 𝛵𝜏 𝛶𝜐 𝛷𝜙𝜑 𝛸𝜒 𝛹𝜓 𝛺𝜔