![]() |
![]() |
#1 |
Dec 2010
2×37 Posts |
![]()
Why do mathematicians care about generalized Fermat factors and extended generalized Fermat factors?
I'm curious, because I've discovered three extended generalized Fermat factors myself as a result of finding some low k-value Proth primes. 63*2^1356980 + 1 divides xGF(1356973,11,4) 229*2^484018 + 1 divides xGF(484017,11,9) 1137*2^79616 + 1 divides xGF(79615,12,7) I can understand the search for classical Fermat factors, mainly because that search is limited, but it seems arbitrary to stop the search for extended GF factors at a=12. Why not a=68, b=65? Do such discoveries aid mathematicians in any way? |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 | |
"Mark"
Apr 2003
Between here and the
164578 Posts |
![]() Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
New Generalized Fermat factors | Batalov | Factoring | 149 | 2017-02-20 12:06 |
Generalized Fermat numbers (in our case primes) | pepi37 | Conjectures 'R Us | 4 | 2015-10-09 14:49 |
Pseudoprimality Hypothesis for Specific Class of Generalized Fermat Numbers | primus | Miscellaneous Math | 1 | 2015-03-25 22:18 |
Generalized Fermat Numbers | ET_ | Programming | 4 | 2008-06-23 07:59 |
Generalized Fermat Prime Search? | pacionet | Lounge | 3 | 2006-01-25 15:40 |