Register FAQ Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

 2021-07-27, 20:39 #2245 Viliam Furik     "Viliam Furík" Jul 2018 Martin, Slovakia 26×11 Posts Screenshots. It seems to be correct now... I swear it was switched last time. I'll tell you if I see it happen again. Unless you made a stealth fix. Attached Thumbnails
2021-07-27, 20:47   #2246
James Heinrich

"James Heinrich"
May 2004
ex-Northern Ontario

23×32×72 Posts

Quote:
 Originally Posted by Viliam Furik Screenshots. It seems to be correct now... I swear it was switched last time. I'll tell you if I see it happen again. Unless you made a stealth fix.
I have not changed anything. If you notice it showing up incorrectly again for whatever reason please do provide another screenshot.

2021-07-28, 02:41   #2247
Zhangrc

"University student"
May 2021
Beijing, China

53 Posts

Quote:
 Originally Posted by Viliam Furik Screenshots. It seems to be correct now... I swear it was switched last time. I'll tell you if I see it happen again. Unless you made a stealth fix.
That error "TF result was not needed" is a bug, I doubt. The TF assignments still help to find more factors, and have not previously been done, so credit should be given.

2021-07-28, 14:31   #2248
James Heinrich

"James Heinrich"
May 2004
ex-Northern Ontario

23·32·72 Posts

Quote:
 Originally Posted by Zhangrc That error "TF result was not needed" is a bug
Not a bug. The exponents have known factors, therefore are certainly not Mersenne Primes, therefore as far as GIMPS (Great Internet Mersenne Prime Search) is concerned no further effort should be spent on this exponent. Users can of course spend their cycles wherever they want, but for the purpose of finding the next Mersenne Prime any effort on an exponent with known factors is wasted effort.

 2021-07-29, 16:58 #2249 kriesel     "TF79LL86GIMPS96gpu17" Mar 2017 US midwest 19·311 Posts PRP DC manual assignments are misrepresented as Cat 0 PRP Assignments obtained today as 84M PRP DC (PRP second test of an exponent with PRP first test already reported) manually assigned are indicated in https://www.mersenne.org/workload/ as PRP, Cat 0, with 7 days allowed to start (or 7 days to complete and be reported, in the case of manual assignments on GPUs, which have no way to report progress). As PRP DC, 84M should be indicated as Cat 4, not Cat 0. (Cat 3 DC today is exponents below 63724104.) This is the case even after they are put on prime95 instances behind other work and expected completion dates reported by PrimeNet API to the server. This issue has lingered on for years and been repeatedly reported previously. Please look into implementing a fix. Otherwise the issue will continue on for several more years. I believe it also affects automatically issued PRP DC via PrimeNet API. Code: CPU Name Core Exponent Work type Current cat Original State% Assigned Last update Est. Complete Days left Expires days Manual testing 1 84661939  PRP 0 0 2021-07-29 2021-07-29 7 Manual testing 1 84662069  PRP 0 0 2021-07-29 2021-07-29 7 Manual testing 1 84662239  PRP 0 0 2021-07-29 2021-07-29 7 Manual testing 1 84662323  PRP 0 0 2021-07-29 2021-07-29 7 Manual testing 1 84663617  PRP 0 0 2021-07-29 2021-07-29 7 Manual testing 1 84663907  PRP 0 0 2021-07-29 2021-07-29 7 Manual testing 1 84665089  PRP 0 0 2021-07-29 2021-07-29 7 Manual testing 1 84665459  PRP 0 0 2021-07-29 2021-07-29 7 Manual testing 1 84666083  PRP 0 0 2021-07-29 2021-07-29 7 Manual testing 1 84666587  PRP 0 0 2021-07-29 2021-07-29 7 Kilroy_was_here 1 84666823  PRP 0 0 PRP 2021-07-29 2021-07-29 2021-08-04 6 30 Kilroy_was_here 2 84666931  PRP 0 0 2021-07-29 2021-07-29 2021-08-06 8 7 Manual testing 1 84667057  PRP 0 0 2021-07-29 2021-07-29 7 Manual testing 1 84667201  PRP 0 0 2021-07-29 2021-07-29 7 ostrich 1 84668011  PRP 0 0 2021-07-29 2021-07-29 2021-08-05 7 7 ostrich 2 84668407  PRP 0 0 PRP 2021-07-29 2021-07-29 2021-08-04 6 30 It seems only exponents checked out as PRP DC for exponents with LL first tests already completed, which is a separate manual assignments page menu selection from ordinary PRP DC, get correctly indicated as PRP-D currently and show appropriate Cat #'s and expiration dates: Code: CPU Name Core Exponent Work type Current cat Original State% Assigned Last update Est. Complete Days left Expires days Manual testing 1 61503457  PRP-D 2 3 2021-06-28 2021-06-28 89 Manual testing 1 61823711  PRP-D 3 3 2021-07-28 2021-07-28 119 Manual testing 1 61823731  PRP-D 3 3 2021-07-28 2021-07-28 119 Last fiddled with by kriesel on 2021-07-29 at 17:08
 2021-07-29, 21:33 #2250 Uncwilly 6809 > 6502     """"""""""""""""""" Aug 2003 101×103 Posts 23·439 Posts All PRP-CF suffer from this too.
 2021-08-01, 08:41 #2251 S485122     "Jacob" Sep 2006 Brussels, Belgium 1,753 Posts Exponent Status Distribution page 5 exponents are missing in the 57M range : Code:  57000000 55901 1 | 36254 19211 435 | 430 | | The 430 assigned exponents can be found using the active assignment page. 5 exponents are missing and they were already missing at the end of June. Other ranges also have missing exponents. Jacob
 2021-08-01, 09:44 #2252 S485122     "Jacob" Sep 2006 Brussels, Belgium 1,753 Posts Strange P-1 results in the database https://www.mersenne.org/report_pminus1/?exp_hi=99, M3 has three P-1 factoring attemps in the database : https://www.mersenne.org/report_expo...exp_hi=&full=1 One would say their computer, their time, their electricity, ... ;-) but I can't understand how those strange attempts found their way in the database. I strongly suspect the results in the database are fakes : the bounds are obviously inane. Why would new results be accepted for a known Mersenne prime ? Jacob
2021-08-01, 17:44   #2253
Prime95
P90 years forever!

Aug 2002
Yeehaw, FL

23·7·137 Posts

Quote:
 Originally Posted by S485122 5 exponents are missing and they were already missing at the end of June. Other ranges also have missing exponents.
Five exponents where the server is (too?) patiently waiting for a proof upload:
Code:
57310949
57311099
57326809
57326917
57331919

2021-08-01, 18:18   #2254
Prime95
P90 years forever!

Aug 2002
Yeehaw, FL

23·7·137 Posts

Quote:
 Originally Posted by Prime95 Five exponents where the server is (too?) patiently waiting for a proof upload:
Something weird going on. The server is supposed to wait 60 days for a proof. At that point it deletes the assignment and makes the exponent available again. In this case, the assignment was deleted (or maybe never assigned in the first place?), but the exponent was not made available again. I've manually corrected the 5 exponents.

Two more that I did not fix:

60800659
60822823

There are also quite a few over 100 million, which does not concern me at the present time. I need to understand why this is happening to create a true fix.

 2021-08-01, 18:47 #2255 kriesel     "TF79LL86GIMPS96gpu17" Mar 2017 US midwest 19·311 Posts These are all LL first test / PRP proof tandem exponents. Three PRP userids. 57310949 tservo 57311099 tservo 57326809 tservo 57326917 tservo 57331919 tservo 60800659 nescro 60822823 Lukas_J

 Similar Threads Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post ewmayer Lounge 39 2015-05-19 01:08 ewmayer Science & Technology 41 2014-04-16 11:54 cheesehead Soap Box 56 2013-06-29 01:42 cheesehead Soap Box 61 2013-06-11 04:30 Dubslow Programming 19 2012-05-31 17:49

All times are UTC. The time now is 23:59.

Sat Nov 27 23:59:47 UTC 2021 up 127 days, 18:28, 0 users, load averages: 1.39, 1.21, 1.08