mersenneforum.org  

Go Back   mersenneforum.org > Great Internet Mersenne Prime Search > PrimeNet

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 2021-07-25, 17:10   #2234
Dobri
 
May 2018

3528 Posts
Default M104044933

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dobri View Post
M101969381 is unassigned for a LL/PRP test and does not appear as 'Avaiable' in the Work Distribution Map.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dobri View Post
The same server problem that occurred in March of this year in the 101-xxxxxx range is now observed for the current lowest untested exponent 103313627 in the 103-xxxxxx range.
It remains unassigned since mid-May, see the attached images.

P.S. Note that said server problem in the 101-xxxxxx range still needs a closure in the Work Distribution Map, because 54316 < 35141 + 14718 + 4458.
54316 | 35141 14718 4458
This time the current lowest untested exponent M104044933 remains unassigned since 2021-01-25, see
<https://www.mersenne.org/report_exponent/?exp_lo=104044933&exp_hi=&full=1>.
Dobri is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2021-07-25, 20:41   #2235
Prime95
P90 years forever!
 
Prime95's Avatar
 
Aug 2002
Yeehaw, FL

23×7×137 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dobri View Post
This time the current lowest untested exponent M104044933 remains unassigned since 2021-01-25, see
<https://www.mersenne.org/report_exponent/?exp_lo=104044933&exp_hi=&full=1>.
I've put in a fix. The problem had to do with the server not wanting to hand out PRP assignments for exponents that had previously been assigned for LL.
Prime95 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 2021-07-26, 17:22   #2236
mrh
 
"mrh"
Oct 2018
Temecula, ca

22×3×5 Posts
Default unintended TF assignments

One of my systems finished a PRP and got a couple of TFs assigned for some reason. It finished 222072449 before I noticed and was working on 222072469.

Didn't hurt anything, but seems really odd since it has WorkPreference=150. Probably just an odd server issue?
mrh is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2021-07-27, 02:17   #2237
Zhangrc
 
"University student"
May 2021
Beijing, China

53 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by mrh View Post
Probably just an odd server issue?
Really odd. Yesterday Ben Delo did several TF assignments too, like M222075827 and M222075551.
Zhangrc is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2021-07-27, 04:23   #2238
slandrum
 
Jan 2021
California

22×61 Posts
Default

And in this post https://www.mersenneforum.org/showpo...postcount=5189 someone is complaining that there are no TF assignments available for 73-74.
slandrum is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2021-07-27, 06:15   #2239
Prime95
P90 years forever!
 
Prime95's Avatar
 
Aug 2002
Yeehaw, FL

23×7×137 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Zhangrc View Post
Really odd. Yesterday Ben Delo did several TF assignments too, like M222075827 and M222075551.
My bad -- bug fix went awry.
Prime95 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 2021-07-27, 06:16   #2240
Prime95
P90 years forever!
 
Prime95's Avatar
 
Aug 2002
Yeehaw, FL

23·7·137 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Zhangrc View Post
Really odd. Yesterday Ben Delo did several TF assignments too, like M222075827 and M222075551.
My bad -- bug fix went awry.

GPUowlers beware -- TF assignments may have been added to your worktodo.txt. I've no idea if that is handled gracefully.
Prime95 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 2021-07-27, 16:10   #2241
kriesel
 
kriesel's Avatar
 
"TF79LL86GIMPS96gpu17"
Mar 2017
US midwest

19·311 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Prime95 View Post
GPUowlers beware -- TF assignments may have been added to your worktodo.txt. I've no idea if that is handled gracefully.
I'm skeptical that gpuowl's primenet.py even would pass them.

Code:
workTypes = dict(PRP=150, PM1=4, LL_DC=101, PRP_DC=151, PRP_WORLD_RECORD=152, PRP_100M=153, PRP_P1=154)
But, tests by manual insertion into worktodo shows gpuowl will ignore them if TF assignments make it into a worktodo file:
Code:
2021-07-27 10:58:00 gpuowl v6.11-364-g36f4e2a
2021-07-27 10:58:00 config: -user kriesel -cpu asr2/radeonvii0 -d 0 -maxAlloc 13000 -proof 10 -use NO_ASM -cleanup -block 2000 -log 100000 -use OUT_WG=256,OUT_SIZEX=8,OUT_SPACING=2
2021-07-27 10:58:00 device 0, unique id ''
2021-07-27 10:58:00 asr2/radeonvii0 worktodo.txt line ignored: "Factor=(aid),122863843,74,76"
(continues on to next worktodo entry)
Code:
2021-07-27 11:03:00 GpuOwl VERSION v7.2-53-ge27846f
2021-07-27 11:03:00 config: -user kriesel -cpu asr2/radeonvii2 -d 2 -maxAlloc 14G -proof 10 -use NO_ASM -autoverify 10 -block 1000 -autoverify 11
2021-07-27 11:03:00 device 2, unique id ''
2021-07-27 11:03:00 asr2/radeonvii2 worktodo.txt line ignored: "Factor=(aid),122863843,74,76"
(continues on to next worktodo entry)
You'd have to be running ~v3.7 on Linux with ROCm for TF to be supported in Gpuowl.
I think any TF that did make it into a recent Gpuowl version's worktodo file would need to be either manually unassigned and deleted, or manually relocated to mfaktx.

Last fiddled with by kriesel on 2021-07-27 at 16:22
kriesel is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2021-07-27, 18:43   #2242
Viliam Furik
 
Viliam Furik's Avatar
 
"Viliam Furík"
Jul 2018
Martin, Slovakia

13008 Posts
Default

On the manual results submission page, when I submit X newly found factors and Y already known, it displays them in the table at the bottom as Y new, X old.

After the next submission, I can add a picture.

I am doing TF on factored 10M exponents from 67 to 68 bits. Some of the factors are known or known composites, but some are new.
Viliam Furik is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 2021-07-27, 18:55   #2243
James Heinrich
 
James Heinrich's Avatar
 
"James Heinrich"
May 2004
ex-Northern Ontario

23×32×72 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Viliam Furik View Post
On the manual results submission page, when I submit X newly found factors and Y already known, it displays them in the table at the bottom as Y new, X old.
After the next submission, I can add a picture.
I am doing TF on factored 10M exponents from 67 to 68 bits. Some of the factors are known or known composites, but some are new.
I'm not sure if this is a comment, question, suggestion, or bug report. Perhaps a screenshot would help, with description of what you would like changed (if applicable).
James Heinrich is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2021-07-27, 19:25   #2244
Viliam Furik
 
Viliam Furik's Avatar
 
"Viliam Furík"
Jul 2018
Martin, Slovakia

26·11 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by James Heinrich View Post
I'm not sure if this is a comment, question, suggestion, or bug report. Perhaps a screenshot would help, with description of what you would like changed (if applicable).
A bug report. The numbers of factors seem to be misplaced. Screenshot coming soon.
Viliam Furik is online now   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Official "Faits erronés dans de belles-lettres" thread ewmayer Lounge 39 2015-05-19 01:08
Official "all-Greek-to-me Fiction Literature and Cinema" Thread ewmayer Science & Technology 41 2014-04-16 11:54
Official "Lasciate ogne speranza" whinge-thread cheesehead Soap Box 56 2013-06-29 01:42
Official "Ernst is a deceiving bully and George is a meanie" thread cheesehead Soap Box 61 2013-06-11 04:30
Official "String copy Statement Considered Harmful" thread Dubslow Programming 19 2012-05-31 17:49

All times are UTC. The time now is 00:26.


Sun Nov 28 00:26:12 UTC 2021 up 127 days, 18:55, 0 users, load averages: 1.08, 1.21, 1.15

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2021, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

This forum has received and complied with 0 (zero) government requests for information.

Permission is granted to copy, distribute and/or modify this document under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.2 or any later version published by the Free Software Foundation.
A copy of the license is included in the FAQ.