20090812, 02:35  #1 
Aug 2009
2_{16} Posts 
Mersene Prime and Number Theory
I have found and tested number, it is has 894,424,861 digits.In my tests it shows this number is a prime. Can anyone help me to verify the primality of this number? The prove and disprove of the primality of this number will be important to number theory.
Thank very much... I can also be contacted in my email address is rcdbulanhagui@yahoo.com . 
20090812, 04:58  #2 
Aug 2009
2 Posts 
Prime
Is there a software that can test mersine prime?

20090812, 19:50  #3 
Einyen
Dec 2003
Denmark
2×7×229 Posts 
894,424,861 digits imply you mean 2^{2,971,215,073}1, but it has a factor: 58547736275141965993, so it can't be prime.
Last fiddled with by ATH on 20090812 at 19:58 
20090813, 09:24  #4  
Nov 2008
2×3^{3}×43 Posts 
Quote:
If someone finds your number is actually prime, then the terrorists will have won. There are no "tests" that can show whether that number is a prime with our current hardware. The fact that you can't even spell "Mersenne" shows you are completely ignorant. You are only trying to draw attention to yourself. 

20090813, 10:03  #5  
Undefined
"The unspeakable one"
Jun 2006
My evil lair
2·23·137 Posts 
Quote:


20090813, 11:16  #6 
Nov 2008
2·3^{3}·43 Posts 
2971215073 is a factor of Fib(423). Why the compositeness of its corresponding Mersenne matters is a question that only Ricie can answer.

20090813, 21:43  #7 
Dec 2008
341_{16} Posts 
Now, now, 10metreh. Cranks (like Ricie) cannot give substantial evidence for their claims (hence the name crank). Furthermore, due to Ricie's lack of verbosity I doubt that he even possesses the ability to answer questions coherently.

20090813, 21:55  #8  
"(^r'°:.:)^n;e'e"
Nov 2008
;t:.:;^
999_{10} Posts 
Quote:
( logic ) if they have never won and have not 10metreh formula, 10metreh then be like them ... Last fiddled with by cmd on 20090813 at 21:56 

20090814, 00:24  #9  
"Richard B. Woods"
Aug 2002
Wisconsin USA
1E0C_{16} Posts 
Quote:
It seems quite evident (to me, at least) that English is not Ricie's first language. Supposedly deducing a lack of mental ability on the basis of some minor errors in written English by a nonnative speaker/writer says more about the deducer's state of mind than it does about the person making the visible errors. This bad habit is far too common on this forum, and it's been far too long since I last complained about it. I ask those who would make such comments: How errorfree and colloquially can you write online in a nonnative language? How would you feel if you posted a sincere question in a "second" language, then saw a native user of that language make such comments about you, ridiculing your mental ability because of some grammar or spelling mistakes? Ricie may or may not have a sound mathematical idea, but confusing (a) the awkwardness in which it is phrased in a nonnative language with (b) the unsoundness of the idea does nothing to help Ricie understand what is or isn't correct mathematically. 

20090814, 00:36  #10  
Dec 2008
7^{2}·17 Posts 
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
HOWEVER, if he could phrase his questions better, then that would be beneficial for both Ricie and other members of this forum. Last fiddled with by flouran on 20090814 at 00:37 

20090814, 01:08  #11  
"Richard B. Woods"
Aug 2002
Wisconsin USA
2^{2}·3·641 Posts 
Quote:
Quote:
Where are they, again  the posts where, after being informed of being wrong, Ricie demonstrates unwillingness to admit wrongness? Please provide links. 

Thread Tools  
Similar Threads  
Thread  Thread Starter  Forum  Replies  Last Post 
Help with a number theory equivalence  lukerichards  Number Theory Discussion Group  7  20180129 14:58 
Basic Number Theory 4: a first look at prime numbers  Nick  Number Theory Discussion Group  6  20161014 19:38 
online tutoring in prime number theory  jasong  Math  3  20050515 04:01 
number theory help  math  Homework Help  2  20040502 18:09 
A problem of number theory  hyh1048576  Puzzles  0  20030928 15:35 