Go Back > Other Stuff > Archived Projects > 3*2^n-1 Search

Thread Tools
Old 2008-06-03, 01:52   #12
jrk's Avatar
May 2008

100010001112 Posts

Oh I don't doubt that double-checking is important (I do it occasionally to test hardware). I just wonder why it can't be a few weeks behind first-time testing, you know, so if someone's interested in making the record list he can make it without getting demoted as a double-check.

But maybe that doesn't matter. I dunno. :)
jrk is offline  
Old 2008-06-03, 02:16   #13
paulunderwood's Avatar
Sep 2002
Database er0rr

3×1,291 Posts

That might be a good idea. I do not know PG's error rates for 321.

On a similar note, wouldn't it be fun to start where we expect the next prime to be and to work outward from that until one is found and then repeat the operation again?

Last fiddled with by paulunderwood on 2008-06-03 at 02:17
paulunderwood is offline  
Old 2008-06-03, 03:09   #14
jrk's Avatar
May 2008

21078 Posts

Yep. It'd also be fun to pick your own assignments, too, if that were possible. So people could entertain their own ideas (though, just as a game, you can't really say much about the distribution of these numbers anyway ).
jrk is offline  
Old 2008-06-05, 18:01   #15
Rytis's Avatar
Nov 2006

83 Posts

There is a new feature coming into BOINC, which will assign a reliability score to computers (they will first crunch doublechecked workunits, and when it's known that the host produces valid data, it will be issued non-doublecheck work). The plan is to have only about 10-20% of work doublechecked and still ensure valid results. And we can always go back to full doublecheck if needed or revisit the single-check numbers later.

Over the last 7 days we had 6.6537% fail rate on Linux (1.1305% aborted by user, 0.2261% returned wrong residue, total of 3096 tests completed) and 11.6169% fail rate on Windows (5.1209% user aborts, 1.0748% wrong residue, total of 12654 tests completed).
Rytis is offline  
Old 2008-06-08, 03:29   #16
Kosmaj's Avatar
Nov 2003

2×1,811 Posts

People who like the prime testing style of 321 are welcome to joing our Riesel Prime Search project searching for primes of form k*2^n-1. We have manual reservations and use LLR only. Everybody is free to test the numbers he/she likes.

Well sieved values in the megabit prime region (n>1M) are available right now for k=5, 15, 17, and 105. Presieved candidates for many k<300 and n<1M organized in so-called "drives" are available as well. Feel free to drop by and have a look.

Kosmaj is offline  

Thread Tools

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Reservations ET_ Operazione Doppi Mersennes 495 2020-12-19 19:41
Reservations kar_bon Riesel Prime Data Collecting (k*2^n-1) 129 2016-09-05 09:23
Where are my reservations fivemack PrimeNet 3 2016-02-08 17:58
Reservations? R.D. Silverman NFS@Home 15 2015-11-29 23:18
Reservations R.D. Silverman Cunningham Tables 15 2011-03-04 21:01

All times are UTC. The time now is 05:51.

Mon Oct 25 05:51:21 UTC 2021 up 94 days, 20 mins, 0 users, load averages: 1.45, 1.14, 1.05

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2021, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

This forum has received and complied with 0 (zero) government requests for information.

Permission is granted to copy, distribute and/or modify this document under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.2 or any later version published by the Free Software Foundation.
A copy of the license is included in the FAQ.