mersenneforum.org  

Go Back   mersenneforum.org > Great Internet Mersenne Prime Search > Hardware > GPU Computing

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 2013-05-23, 14:03   #1
kracker
 
kracker's Avatar
 
"Mr. Meeseeks"
Jan 2012
California, USA

32·241 Posts
Default REAL review and benchmarks for the Geforce GTX 780!

Nvidia GeForce GTX 780 Review: Titan’s Baby Brother Is Born
kracker is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2013-05-23, 15:16   #2
fivemack
(loop (#_fork))
 
fivemack's Avatar
 
Feb 2006
Cambridge, England

2·7·461 Posts
Default

Note that the GTX 780 has double-precision performance crippled, unlike the Titan.
fivemack is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2013-05-23, 15:19   #3
firejuggler
 
firejuggler's Avatar
 
"Vincent"
Apr 2010
Over the rainbow

19×151 Posts
Default

So, 580/590 is still king?
firejuggler is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2013-05-24, 06:34   #4
ET_
Banned
 
ET_'s Avatar
 
"Luigi"
Aug 2002
Team Italia

484810 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by firejuggler View Post
So, 580/590 is still king?
Yes, at least for me...

Luigi
ET_ is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2013-05-24, 12:30   #5
Manpowre
 
"Svein Johansen"
May 2013
Norway

3·67 Posts
Default 780

The Titan has 1/3 in FP32 performance while 680 and 780 has 1/24.
The 580 has 1/8, but only 512 cuda cores. Titan and 780 has 2688 and 2304 cudacores.

The king is still the Titan.

But with 780 introduced to gamers, 580 might be sold in the aftermarket very cheap, so it should be possible to get several 580s cheap, but these sellers want as much as they can get for them so they can purchase 780 now.

Next step for Nvidia is probably a 790 with 2x GK110 chips on same board. but spec is still going to be the same with 1/24 FP32 performance per Kepler chip.

Whether Nvidia will create Titan dual or something is hard to say, but I think the layout of 780 and Titan on the board itself is different. On the other hand, IF the layout is the same, we can end up with a titan dual together with 790..

790 will probably be announced august/september.

During fall they will also probably announce Maxwell for Tesla. and next year Maxwell for consumers in april/may with a 880 board.

Remember that Nvidia is working on Maswell to get direct memory access from hosts machine memory. This with the possibility to launch new kernels from one running kernel which the Titan, 780 and Tesla k20+k20x can do is going to revolutionize computing on GPUs.

Last fiddled with by Manpowre on 2013-05-24 at 12:39
Manpowre is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2013-05-24, 13:21   #6
ET_
Banned
 
ET_'s Avatar
 
"Luigi"
Aug 2002
Team Italia

24×3×101 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Manpowre View Post

But with 780 introduced to gamers, 580 might be sold in the aftermarket very cheap, so it should be possible to get several 580s cheap, but these sellers want as much as they can get for them so they can purchase 780 now.
.
Waiting for 3GB 580s...

Luigi
ET_ is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2013-05-30, 21:11   #7
firejuggler
 
firejuggler's Avatar
 
"Vincent"
Apr 2010
Over the rainbow

19·151 Posts
Default

test of the lower-priced 770
http://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/...w,3519-22.html
firejuggler is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2013-05-31, 02:27   #8
LaurV
Romulan Interpreter
 
LaurV's Avatar
 
"name field"
Jun 2011
Thailand

2×47×109 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by firejuggler View Post
Thanks for the link! VERY comprehensive testing, they included for the first time AutoCAD and SolidWorks (2D and 3D) blending of tests, a lot of gaming, OpenCL performance (very rare included in testing as a separate topic for cuda cards!), etc. Good to see and read "da capo al fine". I won't comment on the performance of the card tho. Maybe there's a reason why it is "lower priced" , it seems to me more like a marketing move, to sell 6xx cheap cards (and GK104 chips, generally) about which the people were not so enthusiast to buy.

Last fiddled with by LaurV on 2013-05-31 at 02:28
LaurV is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2013-05-31, 02:40   #9
kladner
 
kladner's Avatar
 
"Kieren"
Jul 2011
In My Own Galaxy!

100111101011102 Posts
Default

Anandtech has taken to including GPGPU numbers in some test reports, though perhaps not as exhaustive as to application performance.

EDIT: I am delighted that Tom's included a 580 in some of those tests. I'm sure that it would not have looked as good in the power consumption charts had it been included, though it would have been interesting to see them. It makes me feel very good at the prospect of getting a 570 back online.

Last fiddled with by kladner on 2013-05-31 at 02:51
kladner is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2013-05-31, 02:40   #10
kracker
 
kracker's Avatar
 
"Mr. Meeseeks"
Jan 2012
California, USA

41718 Posts
Default

Geforce 770=Essentially a OC'ed 680.

Same GK104.
kracker is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2013-06-26, 09:41   #11
firejuggler
 
firejuggler's Avatar
 
"Vincent"
Apr 2010
Over the rainbow

19×151 Posts
Default

and finallyt, the 760
http://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/...k104,3542.html
firejuggler is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
GTX 1070 8gb review firejuggler GPU Computing 29 2016-11-15 19:16
PicoPSU Review Fred Hardware 7 2016-02-12 16:19
Movie review: Gravity cheesehead Lounge 6 2014-04-12 19:01
Review of calculus/ODE Primeinator Analysis & Analytic Number Theory 15 2011-01-12 23:05
Book Review Numbers Lounge 5 2005-09-30 17:53

All times are UTC. The time now is 18:34.


Mon Dec 5 18:34:22 UTC 2022 up 109 days, 16:02, 0 users, load averages: 0.53, 0.81, 0.89

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2022, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

This forum has received and complied with 0 (zero) government requests for information.

Permission is granted to copy, distribute and/or modify this document under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.2 or any later version published by the Free Software Foundation.
A copy of the license is included in the FAQ.

≠ ± ∓ ÷ × · − √ ‰ ⊗ ⊕ ⊖ ⊘ ⊙ ≤ ≥ ≦ ≧ ≨ ≩ ≺ ≻ ≼ ≽ ⊏ ⊐ ⊑ ⊒ ² ³ °
∠ ∟ ° ≅ ~ ‖ ⟂ ⫛
≡ ≜ ≈ ∝ ∞ ≪ ≫ ⌊⌋ ⌈⌉ ∘ ∏ ∐ ∑ ∧ ∨ ∩ ∪ ⨀ ⊕ ⊗ 𝖕 𝖖 𝖗 ⊲ ⊳
∅ ∖ ∁ ↦ ↣ ∩ ∪ ⊆ ⊂ ⊄ ⊊ ⊇ ⊃ ⊅ ⊋ ⊖ ∈ ∉ ∋ ∌ ℕ ℤ ℚ ℝ ℂ ℵ ℶ ℷ ℸ 𝓟
¬ ∨ ∧ ⊕ → ← ⇒ ⇐ ⇔ ∀ ∃ ∄ ∴ ∵ ⊤ ⊥ ⊢ ⊨ ⫤ ⊣ … ⋯ ⋮ ⋰ ⋱
∫ ∬ ∭ ∮ ∯ ∰ ∇ ∆ δ ∂ ℱ ℒ ℓ
𝛢𝛼 𝛣𝛽 𝛤𝛾 𝛥𝛿 𝛦𝜀𝜖 𝛧𝜁 𝛨𝜂 𝛩𝜃𝜗 𝛪𝜄 𝛫𝜅 𝛬𝜆 𝛭𝜇 𝛮𝜈 𝛯𝜉 𝛰𝜊 𝛱𝜋 𝛲𝜌 𝛴𝜎𝜍 𝛵𝜏 𝛶𝜐 𝛷𝜙𝜑 𝛸𝜒 𝛹𝜓 𝛺𝜔