mersenneforum.org  

Go Back   mersenneforum.org > Other Stuff > Archived Projects > NeRDs

 
 
Thread Tools
Old 2014-03-13, 20:35   #1
paulunderwood
 
paulunderwood's Avatar
 
Sep 2002
Database er0rr

2×74 Posts
Cool Primes found!

We have our first NeRDy prime as part of TOPS. The winning number, found by Chuck Lasher, is 10^360360-10^183037-1, which has been verified prime by Chuck using PFGW. It will enter the top20 Near-repdigits as 12th biggest.

paulunderwood is online now  
Old 2014-03-13, 20:39   #2
firejuggler
 
firejuggler's Avatar
 
"Vincent"
Apr 2010
Over the rainbow

B6B16 Posts
Default

Congratz! 360360 digits? nice!
firejuggler is offline  
Old 2014-11-08, 07:20   #3
Batalov
 
Batalov's Avatar
 
"Serge"
Mar 2008
San Diego, Calif.

242368 Posts
Cool

Well, what do you know. I have one, and it's a toughie: only 29% factored N+1.

Will have to give it a crack with CHG.gp script. (I've proven some primes with CHG before, but never this big. The percentage is pretty good though, the convergence will be fast.)
Batalov is offline  
Old 2014-11-08, 07:27   #4
paulunderwood
 
paulunderwood's Avatar
 
Sep 2002
Database er0rr

10010110000102 Posts
Default

Congrats

Please attribute TOPS, Ksieve, LLR, PrimeForm (a.k.a OpenPFGW for the BLS part), of course, CHG in your new prover code.

According to http://primes.utm.edu/bios/page.php?id=797 the largest number proved with CHG was:

(4529^16381 - 1)/4528 ‏(‎59886 digits) via code CH2 on 12/01/2012

Last fiddled with by paulunderwood on 2014-11-08 at 08:53
paulunderwood is online now  
Old 2014-11-08, 17:26   #5
Batalov
 
Batalov's Avatar
 
"Serge"
Mar 2008
San Diego, Calif.

2×3×1,733 Posts
Smile Two primes for the 388080 series

Overnight, one iteration of CHG came through! Now, there's a good chance that we will have a proof (based on the %-age, we will need maybe 6-7 iterations; and I sacrificed factors of N-1 to make the proof actually shorter: the CHG proof needs only one pass if G or F == 1).
EDIT: just 3 iterations were sufficient. 10^388080-10^112433-1 is prime.

Also, we have another 388k prime, too. This one will be easily proved with PFGW.

Last fiddled with by Batalov on 2014-11-08 at 20:36 Reason: both proofs finished
Batalov is offline  
Old 2014-11-08, 23:19   #6
Batalov
 
Batalov's Avatar
 
"Serge"
Mar 2008
San Diego, Calif.

289E16 Posts
Thumbs up

Quote:
Originally Posted by paulunderwood View Post
According to http://primes.utm.edu/bios/page.php?id=797 the largest number proved with CHG was:

(4529^16381 - 1)/4528 ‏(‎59886 digits) via code CH2 on 12/01/2012
The records in CHG are not in the size but the % factored part, and I've played with that some years earlier.

Among other things, I have proven a relatively uninteresting, artificially constructed (around 25.2% factorization of 10^73260-1) 75k digit prime with CHG back in '11. It took literally weeks. I don't think I reported it, because I got bored and delayed the Prime proof of the dependent p8641. I finished it some time later when I could run a 32-thread linux Primo (in FactorDB, it is also proven by Ray C.).
Code:
n=10^75516-10^2256-1;
F=1;
G= 27457137299220528239776088787.....00000000000000;


Input file is:  TestSuite/P75k2.in
Certificate file is:  TestSuite/P75k2.out
Found values of n, F and G.
    Number to be tested has 75516 digits.
    Modulus has 20151 digits.
Modulus is 26.683667905153090234% of n.


NOTICE: This program assumes that n has passed
    a BLS PRP-test with n, F, and G as given.  If
    not, then any results will be invalid!


Square test passed for G >> F.  Using modified right endpoint.


Search for factors congruent to 1.
    Running CHG with h = 16, u = 7. Right endpoint has 15065 digits.
        Done!  Time elapsed:  35477157ms. (that's ~10 hours for one iteration)
    Running CHG with h = 16, u = 7. Right endpoint has 14861 digits.
        Done!  Time elapsed:  151834429ms. (that's ~42 hours! for one iteration)
    Running CHG with h = 15, u = 6. Right endpoint has 14651 digits.
        Done!  Time elapsed:  11931826ms.
...etc (43 steps)
Two things happened over three years: the computers got better, and Pari was made better! (and GMP that Pari uses can and probably uses AVX these days).

I was pleasantly surprised how fast the 388k prime (but of course 29.08%-factored) turned out to be. And just three iterations, too.
Batalov is offline  
Old 2014-12-22, 17:14   #7
paulunderwood
 
paulunderwood's Avatar
 
Sep 2002
Database er0rr

2·74 Posts
Default

Congrats to Serge Batalov for finding the 3rd prime for the exponent 388080:

10^388080 - 10^332944 - 1

paulunderwood is online now  
Old 2014-12-23, 00:41   #8
Batalov
 
Batalov's Avatar
 
"Serge"
Mar 2008
San Diego, Calif.

2·3·1,733 Posts
Default

And forth:
10^388080 - 10^342029 - 1
Batalov is offline  
Old 2014-12-23, 00:44   #9
paulunderwood
 
paulunderwood's Avatar
 
Sep 2002
Database er0rr

480210 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Batalov View Post
Congrats!

Last fiddled with by paulunderwood on 2014-12-23 at 00:54 Reason: UTM said 388081, but now corrected to 388080
paulunderwood is online now  
Old 2015-01-17, 04:16   #10
Batalov
 
Batalov's Avatar
 
"Serge"
Mar 2008
San Diego, Calif.

289E16 Posts
Thumbs up a NeRDs-related twin pair

A small but elegant twin pair (using one "7" and two "7"s, with the rest of digits being "9"s):
10^4621-2*10^4208-1 is prime
10^4621-2*10^4208-3 is prime (Prime certificate is available)
Batalov is offline  
Old 2015-01-18, 19:13   #11
Batalov
 
Batalov's Avatar
 
"Serge"
Mar 2008
San Diego, Calif.

2·3·1,733 Posts
Cool

And here is its evil twin: i.e. all digits are "7"s, except for one and two "9"s.
(7*10^10014+18*10^3046+11)/9 (PRP) and
(7*10^10014+18*10^3046-7)/9 (PRP)
ECPP proofs are in progress.

There is also a 6655-digit pair using only "3"s and "1"s (proven primes)
(10^6655-6*10^4147-7)/3
(10^6655-6*10^4147-1)/3

M.Kamada collects these records.
Batalov is offline  
 

Thread Tools


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
List of variable-n primes found Oddball Twin Prime Search 125 2023-02-07 17:34
Distribution of Mersenne primes before and after couples of primes found emily Math 35 2022-12-21 16:32
Largest k*2^n-1 Primes Found in 2013 Kosmaj Riesel Prime Search 3 2014-12-12 07:14
Primes found MooMoo2 Twin Prime Search 144 2008-11-05 06:21
I found some primes, what should I do next? gribozavr 15k Search 5 2005-04-17 08:59

All times are UTC. The time now is 08:02.


Mon Sep 25 08:02:42 UTC 2023 up 12 days, 5:45, 0 users, load averages: 0.67, 0.89, 0.93

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2023, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

This forum has received and complied with 0 (zero) government requests for information.

Permission is granted to copy, distribute and/or modify this document under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.2 or any later version published by the Free Software Foundation.
A copy of the license is included in the FAQ.

≠ ± ∓ ÷ × · − √ ‰ ⊗ ⊕ ⊖ ⊘ ⊙ ≤ ≥ ≦ ≧ ≨ ≩ ≺ ≻ ≼ ≽ ⊏ ⊐ ⊑ ⊒ ² ³ °
∠ ∟ ° ≅ ~ ‖ ⟂ ⫛
≡ ≜ ≈ ∝ ∞ ≪ ≫ ⌊⌋ ⌈⌉ ∘ ∏ ∐ ∑ ∧ ∨ ∩ ∪ ⨀ ⊕ ⊗ 𝖕 𝖖 𝖗 ⊲ ⊳
∅ ∖ ∁ ↦ ↣ ∩ ∪ ⊆ ⊂ ⊄ ⊊ ⊇ ⊃ ⊅ ⊋ ⊖ ∈ ∉ ∋ ∌ ℕ ℤ ℚ ℝ ℂ ℵ ℶ ℷ ℸ 𝓟
¬ ∨ ∧ ⊕ → ← ⇒ ⇐ ⇔ ∀ ∃ ∄ ∴ ∵ ⊤ ⊥ ⊢ ⊨ ⫤ ⊣ … ⋯ ⋮ ⋰ ⋱
∫ ∬ ∭ ∮ ∯ ∰ ∇ ∆ δ ∂ ℱ ℒ ℓ
𝛢𝛼 𝛣𝛽 𝛤𝛾 𝛥𝛿 𝛦𝜀𝜖 𝛧𝜁 𝛨𝜂 𝛩𝜃𝜗 𝛪𝜄 𝛫𝜅 𝛬𝜆 𝛭𝜇 𝛮𝜈 𝛯𝜉 𝛰𝜊 𝛱𝜋 𝛲𝜌 𝛴𝜎𝜍 𝛵𝜏 𝛶𝜐 𝛷𝜙𝜑 𝛸𝜒 𝛹𝜓 𝛺𝜔