![]() |
![]() |
#1 |
Sep 2002
Database er0rr
2×74 Posts |
![]()
We have our first NeRDy prime as part of TOPS. The winning number, found by Chuck Lasher, is 10^360360-10^183037-1, which has been verified prime by Chuck using PFGW. It will enter the top20 Near-repdigits as 12th biggest.
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
"Vincent"
Apr 2010
Over the rainbow
B6B16 Posts |
![]()
Congratz! 360360 digits? nice!
|
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
"Serge"
Mar 2008
San Diego, Calif.
242368 Posts |
![]()
Well, what do you know. I have one, and it's a toughie: only 29% factored N+1.
Will have to give it a crack with CHG.gp script. (I've proven some primes with CHG before, but never this big. The percentage is pretty good though, the convergence will be fast.) |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Sep 2002
Database er0rr
10010110000102 Posts |
![]()
Congrats
![]() Please attribute TOPS, Ksieve, LLR, PrimeForm (a.k.a OpenPFGW for the BLS part), of course, CHG in your new prover code. According to http://primes.utm.edu/bios/page.php?id=797 the largest number proved with CHG was: (4529^16381 - 1)/4528 (59886 digits) via code CH2 on 12/01/2012 Last fiddled with by paulunderwood on 2014-11-08 at 08:53 |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
"Serge"
Mar 2008
San Diego, Calif.
2×3×1,733 Posts |
![]()
Overnight, one iteration of CHG came through! Now, there's a good chance that we will have a proof (based on the %-age, we will need maybe 6-7 iterations; and I sacrificed factors of N-1 to make the proof actually shorter: the CHG proof needs only one pass if G or F == 1).
EDIT: just 3 iterations were sufficient. 10^388080-10^112433-1 is prime. Also, we have another 388k prime, too. This one will be easily proved with PFGW. Last fiddled with by Batalov on 2014-11-08 at 20:36 Reason: both proofs finished |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 | |
"Serge"
Mar 2008
San Diego, Calif.
289E16 Posts |
![]() Quote:
Among other things, I have proven a relatively uninteresting, artificially constructed (around 25.2% factorization of 10^73260-1) 75k digit prime with CHG back in '11. It took literally weeks. I don't think I reported it, because I got bored and delayed the Prime proof of the dependent p8641. I finished it some time later when I could run a 32-thread linux Primo (in FactorDB, it is also proven by Ray C.). Code:
n=10^75516-10^2256-1; F=1; G= 27457137299220528239776088787.....00000000000000; Input file is: TestSuite/P75k2.in Certificate file is: TestSuite/P75k2.out Found values of n, F and G. Number to be tested has 75516 digits. Modulus has 20151 digits. Modulus is 26.683667905153090234% of n. NOTICE: This program assumes that n has passed a BLS PRP-test with n, F, and G as given. If not, then any results will be invalid! Square test passed for G >> F. Using modified right endpoint. Search for factors congruent to 1. Running CHG with h = 16, u = 7. Right endpoint has 15065 digits. Done! Time elapsed: 35477157ms. (that's ~10 hours for one iteration) Running CHG with h = 16, u = 7. Right endpoint has 14861 digits. Done! Time elapsed: 151834429ms. (that's ~42 hours! for one iteration) Running CHG with h = 15, u = 6. Right endpoint has 14651 digits. Done! Time elapsed: 11931826ms. ...etc (43 steps) I was pleasantly surprised how fast the 388k prime (but of course 29.08%-factored) turned out to be. And just three iterations, too. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
Sep 2002
Database er0rr
2·74 Posts |
![]()
Congrats to Serge Batalov for finding the 3rd prime for the exponent 388080:
10^388080 - 10^332944 - 1 ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 |
"Serge"
Mar 2008
San Diego, Calif.
2·3·1,733 Posts |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 | |
Sep 2002
Database er0rr
480210 Posts |
![]() Quote:
![]() Last fiddled with by paulunderwood on 2014-12-23 at 00:54 Reason: UTM said 388081, but now corrected to 388080 |
|
![]() |
![]() |
#10 |
"Serge"
Mar 2008
San Diego, Calif.
289E16 Posts |
![]()
A small but elegant twin pair (using one "7" and two "7"s, with the rest of digits being "9"s):
10^4621-2*10^4208-1 is prime 10^4621-2*10^4208-3 is prime (Prime certificate is available) |
![]() |
![]() |
#11 |
"Serge"
Mar 2008
San Diego, Calif.
2·3·1,733 Posts |
![]()
And here is its evil twin: i.e. all digits are "7"s, except for one and two "9"s.
(7*10^10014+18*10^3046+11)/9 (PRP) and (7*10^10014+18*10^3046-7)/9 (PRP) ECPP proofs are in progress. There is also a 6655-digit pair using only "3"s and "1"s (proven primes) (10^6655-6*10^4147-7)/3 (10^6655-6*10^4147-1)/3 M.Kamada collects these records. |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
List of variable-n primes found | Oddball | Twin Prime Search | 125 | 2023-02-07 17:34 |
Distribution of Mersenne primes before and after couples of primes found | emily | Math | 35 | 2022-12-21 16:32 |
Largest k*2^n-1 Primes Found in 2013 | Kosmaj | Riesel Prime Search | 3 | 2014-12-12 07:14 |
Primes found | MooMoo2 | Twin Prime Search | 144 | 2008-11-05 06:21 |
I found some primes, what should I do next? | gribozavr | 15k Search | 5 | 2005-04-17 08:59 |