![]() |
![]() |
#1 |
May 2011
Orange Park, FL
13×71 Posts |
![]()
Chris: Just wondering — how many participants use the "Let GPU 72 Decide" assignment option?
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
If I May
"Chris Halsall"
Sep 2002
Barbados
2×5,647 Posts |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
May 2003
Belgium
23×5×7 Posts |
![]()
I'm probably one of those 6, for a single GPU (GTX570M).
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
"GIMFS"
Sep 2002
Oeiras, Portugal
2×7×113 Posts |
![]()
Ressurecting this thread for a (probably dumb) question:
What´s the difference in criterion between the "What makes sense" and "Let GPU72 decide" options for getting work from GPU72 server? After all, GPU72 decisions are supposed to make sense... ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 | |
If I May
"Chris Halsall"
Sep 2002
Barbados
2×5,647 Posts |
![]() Quote:
GPU72 sometimes varies assignments requested under this assignment type with Jerry's and LaurV's machines (with their knowledge and permission). This is to keep the Category 4 DC and LL clients feed. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
"GIMFS"
Sep 2002
Oeiras, Portugal
2×7×113 Posts |
![]()
OK, I see.
Last night I requested DCTF work under "What makes sense" and got 346xxxxx from 70 to 71. Then I used "Let GPU72 decide" and got 347xxxxx from 69 to 70. Thx for the info. I´ll submit the results as soon as the server comes to life. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
"/X\(‘-‘)/X\"
Jan 2013
5·72·13 Posts |
![]()
When picking "Let GPU72 Decide" on LLTF get assignments page ever give DCTF assignments? I'm merely curious. I really don't care if I do LL or DC.
I've got my Linux boxes set up to automatically fetch "Let GPU72 Decide" work from the LLTF page, configured to buffer approximately 2 days of work for each GPU. Is 2 days of buffer delay good for the project? One of my cards takes over a day to do a 73->74 assignment. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 | ||
If I May
"Chris Halsall"
Sep 2002
Barbados
2×5,647 Posts |
![]() Quote:
(One exception: I have in the past occasionally given LaurV's or Jerry's machines DCTF work if we're under a crunch in the DC "Cat4" range, but that shouldn't be needed now that I'm leveraging on several EC2 g2.2xlarge instances plus my G580 to build up a buffer when needed.) Quote:
![]() |
||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 |
"/X\(‘-‘)/X\"
Jan 2013
5·72·13 Posts |
![]()
Speaking of which, perhaps the MISFIT forum and teknohog's primetools could be linked from the Submission Spider page on gpu72.com? It would help people find them easier, especially primetools, which doesn't have its own forum. :)
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#10 | |
If I May
"Chris Halsall"
Sep 2002
Barbados
2·5,647 Posts |
![]() Quote:
I'm currently having an "argument" with a new Samsung washing machine my girlfriend bought this last Saturday. The control interface looks like something from a space-ship. (Much water was to be mopped up.) It seems to claim it is smarter than both of us put together (it might not be wrong ![]() Last fiddled with by chalsall on 2014-06-23 at 19:51 Reason: s/I seems/It seems/ |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#11 | |
"/X\(‘-‘)/X\"
Jan 2013
61618 Posts |
![]() Quote:
Now to see how long I feel like paying for this experiment... Edit: looks like I hit a race condition. I ended up getting one set of assignments 9 times, when all 5 machines (10 cards) launched at once. My guess is a non-isolated read in the database. I'll have to hack in a random delay for polling for work. Last fiddled with by Mark Rose on 2014-06-24 at 10:11 |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
GPU72.COM is down | swl551 | GPU to 72 | 2 | 2023-01-24 16:25 |
Let GPU72 Decide and other questions | jschwar313 | GPU to 72 | 11 | 2016-10-14 19:16 |
Factor not recorded by GPU72 | bayanne | GPU to 72 | 24 | 2014-05-16 09:20 |
GPU72 out of 332M exponents? | Uncwilly | GPU to 72 | 16 | 2014-04-11 11:31 |
Cooperative Agreement or Capitalist Takeover? You decide! | cheesehead | Lounge | 97 | 2013-11-16 21:19 |