mersenneforum.org Time to complete project
 User Name Remember Me? Password
 Register FAQ Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

 2006-01-08, 09:54 #1 Citrix     Jun 2003 157910 Posts Time to complete project Does anyone know how many years/hrs/min/ sec it will take to complete the project. THis will give us a better idea of how to proceed. How many machines we need etc. In order to do so we need benchmarks of various n values. Do 100 iterations and calc average time per iterations. This need to be done, each time FFT length changes. Anyone with expert knowledge on how to make these calculations? Thanks, Citrix
 2006-01-08, 10:20 #2 drakkar67     Feb 2003 Istanbul 22·13 Posts I think hunting primes in the near future is more important than the iteration times. If we can hunt 1 or 2 primes until the n=2000000 barrier, it will be easy to recruit some more members (without losing some), and the computing power of the project will increase. And, IMHO, density of the numbers to test is more important than iteration times. So, after we pass the n=2150000 barrier FFT length will increase and sieving will be more important. I hope the gap between 16000 and 85000 closes until then because sieving those ranges only eliminates candidates above 20M. As a result, the first priority, IMHO, must be recruiting new members. And we must discuss how we can recruit them. After we pass to 224 K FFT length (I think it will take 4-5 months) we will have a better idea (if we can eliminate some k's). drakkar67
 2006-01-08, 10:24 #3 Citrix     Jun 2003 30538 Posts I am just interested in a rough estimate as what is the maximum time the project can take, if we do not find any prime till 50M. (Assuming we do not sieve any more) Citrix
 2006-01-08, 15:55 #4 hhh     Jun 2005 373 Posts Back of the envelope style. We have 1.5 million tests until 50 M. Say we find some primes, sieve etc. and need to do only 500000 of them. One test takes one week on an average computer, given n=7M (some will take much longer, or a little less). So we have 500000 computer weeks, or 10000 computer years. If we had 1000 computers, it would still take more than ten years to 50M. . The good news is: We might be done until then, too, while Seti will be still wasting electricity on s. Let's just continue crunching, and not too much worry about the future. H.
2006-01-08, 19:05   #5
NeoGen

Dec 2005

2×33 Posts

Quote:
 Originally Posted by hhh We might be done until then, too, while Seti will be still wasting electricity on s.
I can't help to wonder if they would actually go public about it if they did happen to find some piece of alien communication...
I think not... so who knows if they haven't already picked up bits of it already?
Ok... I won't continue this line of thought because I know this would lead to an immense debate that is totally off-topic on a maths forum.

Just try to forget I said all that...

2006-01-09, 03:45   #6
Brucifer

Dec 2005

4718 Posts

Quote:
 Originally Posted by NeoGen Just try to forget I said all that...
heh.... okay....

 Thread Tools

 Similar Threads Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post rogue FermatSearch 6 2016-07-16 14:14 SaneMur Information & Answers 33 2012-01-02 08:46 paulunderwood Five or Bust - The Dual Sierpinski Problem 2 2011-02-17 00:34 JuanTutors Software 3 2004-06-28 10:47 dsouza123 Software 12 2003-08-21 18:38

All times are UTC. The time now is 00:07.

Wed Apr 21 00:07:54 UTC 2021 up 12 days, 18:48, 0 users, load averages: 2.46, 3.34, 3.54

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2021, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

This forum has received and complied with 0 (zero) government requests for information.

Permission is granted to copy, distribute and/or modify this document under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.2 or any later version published by the Free Software Foundation.
A copy of the license is included in the FAQ.