mersenneforum.org  

Go Back   mersenneforum.org > Factoring Projects > Factoring

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 2016-08-14, 13:40   #1
mattmill30
 
Aug 2015

568 Posts
Default Exponent fully factored whilst only 74% known

Can someone explain why M397 is labeled as fully factored, when the details are:
Quote:
Known prime factors (8 factors, 294.6 bits, 74.21164755% known):
Remaining cofactor is a probable-prime
Why wouldn't the exponent need to be 100% known before it can be labeled fully factored?

I also note that there are no PRPs attached to M397, which I would have expected with the mention of a probably-prime.
mattmill30 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2016-08-14, 14:50   #2
axn
 
axn's Avatar
 
Jun 2003

134816 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by mattmill30 View Post
Can someone explain why M397 is labeled as fully factored
Two answers.

1) Because it is.
2) Lazy programmer.

In this particular case, all the factors are small and proven prime, but in the general case, a fully-factored exponent will result from a bunch of small factors and a large PRP cofactor. We're confident that the PRP cofactor is prime, but it will not be mathematically proven. There is no separate logic in the website to handle when the last factor is proven vs PRP.
axn is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 2016-08-14, 14:51   #3
retina
Undefined
 
retina's Avatar
 
"The unspeakable one"
Jun 2006
My evil lair

11×557 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by mattmill30 View Post
Can someone explain why M397 is labeled as fully factored, when the details are:


Why wouldn't the exponent need to be 100% known before it can be labeled fully factored?

I also note that there are no PRPs attached to M397, which I would have expected with the mention of a probably-prime.
You can verify the final factor 6597485910270326519900042655193 quite easily.

It is a real prime BTW
retina is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2016-08-14, 18:09   #4
GP2
 
GP2's Avatar
 
Sep 2003

22·647 Posts
Default

By convention, if an exponent is fully factored, the largest factor is omitted from the database (in both mersenne.org and mersenne.ca).

Storing it would be redundant, since it easily calculated by dividing the Mersenne number itself by all of its other factors. And in most cases (although not here), it is many orders of magnitude larger than the next largest factor, so there would be enormous storage costs, for example:

M5240707 = 75392810903 * (a probable prime with 1.5776 million digits)


Note that the 273 fully factored Mersenne exponents up to and including M63703 really are fully factored, with primality certificates calculated for the remaining cofactor using programs like Primo, whereas all larger "fully factored" Mersenne exponents (of which 30 are known) are only "probably fully factored".

Last fiddled with by GP2 on 2016-08-14 at 18:15
GP2 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Largest Mersenne Number Fully Factored? c10ck3r Data 49 2017-12-10 19:39
Fully factored mattmill30 PrimeNet 23 2017-02-13 12:42
Possibility of a Fully-Factored Number Trejack FactorDB 7 2016-05-14 05:38
New program to fully factor with GMP-ECM rogue GMP-ECM 51 2009-06-01 12:53
exponent factored? Mini-Geek PrimeNet 2 2006-08-26 10:15

All times are UTC. The time now is 11:20.

Thu Apr 22 11:20:22 UTC 2021 up 14 days, 6:01, 0 users, load averages: 1.80, 1.64, 1.74

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2021, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

This forum has received and complied with 0 (zero) government requests for information.

Permission is granted to copy, distribute and/or modify this document under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.2 or any later version published by the Free Software Foundation.
A copy of the license is included in the FAQ.